Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Intel Core i7-9850H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-9850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9850H

The Intel Core i7-9850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8850H, the 9850H offers only improved clock rates.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. Compared to the i7-8850H, the performance improved only slightly.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840HSIntel Core i7-9850HIntel Xeon E-2276M
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Coffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 126 / 12
TDP28 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9850H
30.4 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
31.4 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (56%)     max: 103.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (73%)     max: 681 Points
min: 425     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (48%)     max: 454 Points
484 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
min: 1800     avg: 2114     median: 2114 (5%)     max: 2428 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
min: 1114     avg: 1205     median: 1230 (8%)     max: 1272 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (75%)     max: 270 Points
min: 192     avg: 193.8     median: 193 (54%)     max: 196.5 Points
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (54%)     max: 201 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.5 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7169 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31938 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
42090 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9224 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
278 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5621 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
min: 25786     avg: 29714     median: 31087 (18%)     max: 32268 MIPS
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
min: 5020     avg: 5066     median: 5086 (60%)     max: 5092 MIPS
5214 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
68.3 fps (23%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
201.3 fps (46%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
min: 7     avg: 8.4     median: 9 (16%)     max: 9.1 fps
9.7 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
min: 411     avg: 459.3     median: 415 (3%)     max: 552 Seconds
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9137     avg: 10056     median: 10056 (21%)     max: 10975 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
467.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 26292     avg: 34763     median: 37665 (29%)     max: 40333 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (43%)     max: 18690 Points
min: 9987     avg: 11361     median: 11512 (28%)     max: 12585 Points
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (31%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 54664     avg: 57802     median: 56870 (46%)     max: 61872 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
min: 8390     avg: 9853     median: 9841 (25%)     max: 11328 Points
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
min: 14059     avg: 15802     median: 15330 (27%)     max: 18016 Points
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
min: 4588     avg: 5605     median: 5953 (25%)     max: 6275 Points
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (64%)     max: 2602 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
1150 Points (45%)
1303 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
5270 Points (9%)
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
min: 1135     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (5%)     max: 1203 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
min: 5353     avg: 5620     median: 5619.5 (18%)     max: 5886 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5320     avg: 5509     median: 5594 (56%)     max: 5614 Points
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18098     avg: 22010     median: 23715 (24%)     max: 24218 Points
102%
1 E-2276M +
24150 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5376 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
20077 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
min: 1010     avg: 1018     median: 1015 (1%)     max: 1028 ms
784 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (70%)     max: 96182 Points
min: 38630     avg: 39090     median: 39091 (30%)     max: 39548 Points
56114 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
220 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9850H → 60% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 67% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 20:34:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11350 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751135686s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.009s ... 0.023s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11350 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 11350 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.081s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)