Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840HSAMD Ryzen AI 7 350
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Krackan Point (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Strix / Gorgon Point
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT8
Chip AI39 TOPS INT866 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.5 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
41 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (50%)     max: 103.6 Points
min: 113.5     avg: 115.8     median: 115.5 (58%)     max: 119 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
min: 720     avg: 892     median: 905 (17%)     max: 1011 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
min: 12647     avg: 15721     median: 15971.5 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (71%)     max: 1746 Points
min: 1916     avg: 1960     median: 1954 (79%)     max: 2006 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (73%)     max: 681 Points
min: 751     avg: 768     median: 769 (84%)     max: 784 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
min: 4897     avg: 6114     median: 6245.5 (15%)     max: 6990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2438     median: 2477 (16%)     max: 2734 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (75%)     max: 270 Points
min: 204     avg: 280.1     median: 296 (82%)     max: 305 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
min: 48124     avg: 57016     median: 58647 (34%)     max: 64653 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
min: 5544     avg: 6012     median: 6033.5 (71%)     max: 6371 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
155.1 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
319 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
min: 14     avg: 19.9     median: 20.6 (36%)     max: 22.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
min: 281     avg: 333.6     median: 322 (4%)     max: 427 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 221.5     median: 200 (1%)     max: 386 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4934 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
8.7 s (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (43%)     max: 18690 Points
min: 13154     avg: 19303     median: 19672 (48%)     max: 21820 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74698     avg: 77067     median: 77668.5 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
min: 13958     avg: 17897     median: 18291 (46%)     max: 20125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
min: 20603     avg: 27063     median: 28243 (50%)     max: 30008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
min: 7361     avg: 9857     median: 10149 (43%)     max: 11005 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (59%)     max: 2602 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2737     median: 2854 (66%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
min: 10774     avg: 12985     median: 13083 (51%)     max: 14194 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (65%)     max: 1946 Points
min: 805     avg: 1873     median: 2065.5 (69%)     max: 2155 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
min: 6705     avg: 11162     median: 11344 (20%)     max: 12968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
min: 431     avg: 499.6     median: 437 (1%)     max: 702 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (61%)     max: 96182 Points
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (76%)     max: 119825 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (65%)     max: 257 Points
min: 193.1     avg: 250.6     median: 253.5 (66%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
min: 256     avg: 297.6     median: 304 (55%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
min: 1406     avg: 1741     median: 1757 (66%)     max: 2005 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
min: 32.9     avg: 75     median: 70.3 (12%)     max: 112.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
min: 30     avg: 74.3     median: 67.5 (12%)     max: 115.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
min: 3.7     avg: 10.5     median: 6 (4%)     max: 56.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 7.5 Watt
min: 4.21     avg: 7.1     median: 6.9 (5%)     max: 12.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt
min: 21     avg: 36.4     median: 35.9 (27%)     max: 67.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 115% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 30. 01:31:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767054691s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Dec 2025 10:37:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.052s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)