Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Oryon
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)Qualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE compare3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 compare - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 compare - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz <=3400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.6     median: 105 (59%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 912     median: 913 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16343     median: 16188 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
min: 8353     avg: 9854     median: 10115 (9%)     max: 10960 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1769     median: 1774 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1111     avg: 1124     median: 1127 (47%)     max: 1130 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 688 (75%)     max: 705 Points
min: 408     avg: 419.5     median: 421 (46%)     max: 426 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6061     avg: 6387     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
min: 3168     avg: 3712     median: 3790.5 (9%)     max: 4193 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2473     avg: 2587     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
min: 1984     avg: 2162     median: 2187 (14%)     max: 2351 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 270     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (77%)     max: 286 Points
min: 208     avg: 211.7     median: 211 (58%)     max: 216 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.59     avg: 29.9     median: 29.7 (38%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (78%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7515     avg: 7599     median: 7574 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 48003     median: 48144 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85254     median: 84973 (54%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14130     median: 14177 (17%)     max: 14197 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 73.4     median: 72.8 (1%)     max: 75.535 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.244 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7133     median: 7271 (12%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 59538     avg: 69163     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
min: 38047     avg: 44942     median: 45771.5 (26%)     max: 49172 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6049     avg: 6558     median: 6604 (78%)     max: 6754 MIPS
min: 4341     avg: 4582     median: 4618.5 (54%)     max: 4703 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 142.85     avg: 145.4     median: 144.1 (48%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 280     avg: 286.5     median: 281.5 (65%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 19.9     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
min: 6.39     avg: 6.9     median: 6.7 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (36%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.2     avg: 13.3     median: 14.7 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.6     median: 319 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 545     avg: 635     median: 652 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 313     avg: 365     median: 369.5 (3%)     max: 428 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
min: 0.724     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14213     avg: 15469     median: 15583 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.7     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.676     avg: 18.9     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72488     avg: 81330     median: 82000.5 (63%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17320     avg: 22264     median: 22611 (56%)     max: 25584 Points
min: 10083     avg: 13706     median: 14374 (35%)     max: 14969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 88106     median: 89565 (73%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80023     avg: 88577     median: 88981 (72%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83382     avg: 90268     median: 91995 (74%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13602     avg: 19552     median: 20556.5 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24338     avg: 27634     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
min: 11353     avg: 17429     median: 18516 (33%)     max: 18972 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8903     avg: 10918     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
min: 2722     avg: 4725     median: 5121 (22%)     max: 5352 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2660     median: 2670 (67%)     max: 2721 Points
min: 2354     avg: 2441     median: 2455 (61%)     max: 2464 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12998     median: 13088 (51%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2488     avg: 2682     median: 2603 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12439     avg: 14395     median: 12823.5 (53%)     max: 21003 Points
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1962     median: 1957.5 (76%)     max: 2017 Points
min: 1576     avg: 1679     median: 1666.5 (65%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8446     avg: 11688     median: 11859.5 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
min: 6244     avg: 9624     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 14043 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11542     median: 11888 (37%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7879     avg: 8077     median: 8144.5 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47599     avg: 48497     median: 48725.5 (49%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485     avg: 511     median: 516 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 450.7     avg: 459.1     median: 454.2 (1%)     max: 482.4 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (67%)     max: 91831 Points
min: 79579     avg: 80168     median: 80003 (59%)     max: 81088 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (72%)     max: 319 Points
min: 271     avg: 284.8     median: 285.5 (78%)     max: 297 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 320 (57%)     max: 339 Points
min: 395     avg: 413.4     median: 419 (75%)     max: 423 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1566     avg: 1769     median: 1802 (67%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 978     avg: 1193     median: 1248 (47%)     max: 1401 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.7     avg: 92.2     median: 86.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 34     avg: 44.4     median: 45.4 (8%)     max: 52.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 97.6     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
min: 63     avg: 64.2     median: 64.2 (12%)     max: 65.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.6     median: 11.5 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
min: 2.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.4 (4%)     max: 9.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.3     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
34.9 Points per Watt (26%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 76% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 23. 01:32:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755905546s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.035s ... 0.046s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.002s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.001s ... 0.049s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.106s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.107s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)