Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a China-only Hawk Point family chip that never received an official launch. Targeted at gaming and productivity laptops but widely used in mini-PCs, too, the 8745HS features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 4.9 GHz, along with the still fairly capable Radeon 780M iGPU. There is no NPU here.

As an APU meant for use within China, this Ryzen 7 should be fully compliant with the Chinese government-approved cryptography standards.

The only difference between the 8745HS and the 8745H is the slightly lower default wattage of the latter, potentially leading to slightly lower clock speeds.

Performance

We fully expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz) meaning its multi-thread performance is a little better than the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support along with other improvements, like larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Elsewhere, the 8745HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is onboard, too. Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered on to the motherboard for good (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC). As far as gaming is concerned, many titles are still playable at 1080p as of early 2025 albeit with most settings dialed down do Lowest or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing faster. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7840HSAMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8745HS
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.6     median: 105 (59%)     max: 107 Points
min: 96     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 101 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 912     median: 913 (17%)     max: 956 Points
min: 696     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (15%)     max: 869 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16343     median: 16188 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
min: 13928     avg: 15082     median: 15082 (14%)     max: 16236 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1769     median: 1774 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
min: 1598     avg: 1650     median: 1649.5 (69%)     max: 1701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 688 (75%)     max: 705 Points
min: 623     avg: 641     median: 640.5 (70%)     max: 658 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6061     avg: 6387     median: 6344 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
min: 5546     avg: 5949     median: 5948.5 (15%)     max: 6351 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2473     avg: 2587     median: 2565 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
min: 2120     avg: 2349     median: 2349 (15%)     max: 2578 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 270     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (77%)     max: 286 Points
min: 254     avg: 258.5     median: 258.5 (72%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.59     avg: 29.9     median: 29.7 (38%)     max: 30.25 Points
min: 26.63     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 30.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (78%)     max: 3.33 Points
min: 3.01     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (74%)     max: 3.18 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7515     avg: 7599     median: 7574 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
min: 6919     avg: 7109     median: 7109 (43%)     max: 7299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45602     avg: 48003     median: 48144 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
min: 42597     avg: 44583     median: 44583 (32%)     max: 46569 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 83726     avg: 85254     median: 84973 (54%)     max: 87064 Points
min: 73346     avg: 80094     median: 80094 (51%)     max: 86842 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14015     avg: 14130     median: 14177 (17%)     max: 14197 Points
min: 13252     avg: 13560     median: 13559.5 (17%)     max: 13867 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 73.4     median: 72.8 (1%)     max: 75.535 s
min: 70.237     avg: 78.5     median: 78.5 (1%)     max: 86.762 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.244 s
min: 2.895     avg: 3     median: 3 (1%)     max: 3.168 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6428     avg: 7133     median: 7271 (12%)     max: 7699 Points
min: 6655     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (11%)     max: 6832 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 59538     avg: 69163     median: 70243 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
min: 61021     avg: 62467     median: 62466.5 (36%)     max: 63912 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6049     avg: 6558     median: 6604 (78%)     max: 6754 MIPS
min: 6058     avg: 6196     median: 6196 (73%)     max: 6334 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 142.85     avg: 145.4     median: 144.1 (48%)     max: 149.3 fps
min: 116.3     avg: 132     median: 132 (44%)     max: 147.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 280     avg: 286.5     median: 281.5 (65%)     max: 298 fps
min: 253.5     avg: 259.5     median: 259.5 (60%)     max: 265.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.7     avg: 19.9     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (37%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (36%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.2     avg: 13.3     median: 14.7 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
min: 11     avg: 12     median: 12 (31%)     max: 12.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.6     median: 319 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
min: 308     avg: 360     median: 360 (5%)     max: 412 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 185     avg: 198.7     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 197     avg: 223     median: 223 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
min: 0.4716     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4824 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14213     avg: 15469     median: 15583 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
min: 12566     avg: 13889     median: 14260 (30%)     max: 14842 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.112     avg: 7.7     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
min: 7.327     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.767 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.676     avg: 18.9     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
min: 18.261     avg: 18.9     median: 18.9 (1%)     max: 19.501 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
724 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72488     avg: 81330     median: 82000.5 (63%)     max: 85884 Points
min: 60822     avg: 75015     median: 81786 (63%)     max: 82438 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17320     avg: 22264     median: 22611 (56%)     max: 25584 Points
min: 18094     avg: 18883     median: 18786 (46%)     max: 19770 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 88106     median: 89565 (73%)     max: 93910 Points
min: 75153     avg: 80190     median: 80377 (65%)     max: 85041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80023     avg: 88577     median: 88981 (72%)     max: 93208 Points
min: 74475     avg: 79731     median: 80119 (65%)     max: 84598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83382     avg: 90268     median: 91995 (74%)     max: 95508 Points
min: 82213     avg: 83020     median: 83423 (67%)     max: 83423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13602     avg: 19552     median: 20556.5 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
min: 17585     avg: 19129     median: 19399 (49%)     max: 20403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24338     avg: 27634     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
min: 22958     avg: 25619     median: 25815 (46%)     max: 28084 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8903     avg: 10918     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
min: 8644     avg: 9841     median: 9408 (40%)     max: 11471 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2660     median: 2670 (67%)     max: 2721 Points
min: 2439     avg: 2504     median: 2522 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12998     median: 13088 (51%)     max: 13498 Points
min: 9801     avg: 10477     median: 9956 (39%)     max: 11675 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2488     avg: 2682     median: 2603 (83%)     max: 3105 Points
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12439     avg: 14395     median: 12823.5 (53%)     max: 21003 Points
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1837     avg: 1962     median: 1957.5 (76%)     max: 2017 Points
min: 1802     avg: 1847     median: 1865 (73%)     max: 1875 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8446     avg: 11688     median: 11859.5 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
min: 9645     avg: 10037     median: 9864 (18%)     max: 10601 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
min: 1733     avg: 1769     median: 1761 (8%)     max: 1813 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11542     median: 11888 (37%)     max: 12278 Points
min: 9697     avg: 10014     median: 9815 (31%)     max: 10531 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7879     avg: 8077     median: 8144.5 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
min: 7336     avg: 7475     median: 7430 (74%)     max: 7659 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47599     avg: 48497     median: 48725.5 (49%)     max: 48906 Points
min: 40481     avg: 41166     median: 40493 (40%)     max: 42524 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485     avg: 511     median: 516 (1%)     max: 544 ms
min: 537     avg: 563     median: 563 (1%)     max: 589 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (67%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (72%)     max: 319 Points
min: 233     avg: 242     median: 242 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 288     avg: 316.9     median: 320 (57%)     max: 339 Points
min: 282     avg: 286     median: 286 (51%)     max: 290 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1566     avg: 1769     median: 1802 (67%)     max: 1891 Points
min: 1599     avg: 1619     median: 1618.5 (61%)     max: 1638 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 64.7     avg: 92.2     median: 86.6 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
min: 50.9     avg: 71.7     median: 71.7 (12%)     max: 92.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.7     avg: 97.6     median: 88.7 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
min: 50.5     avg: 76     median: 76 (14%)     max: 101.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.6     median: 11.5 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
min: 7.44     avg: 8     median: 8 (5%)     max: 8.46 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.1     avg: 28.3     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt
min: 25.4     avg: 33.7     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 42 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS → 93% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 09. 02:28:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19649 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754699285s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Aug 2025 14:21:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.029s ... 0.039s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19649 +0.004s ... 0.043s

#10 got single benchmarks 19649 +0.006s ... 0.049s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.06s ... 0.109s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)