, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T1200 Laptop GPU (or Quadro T1200 for laptops) is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650 Ti, the Quadro T1000 features less CUDA cores / shaders (768 versus 896). The Quadro T2000 uses the same TU117 chip, but features all 1024 cores (2x to the T1000) and is therefore significantly faster. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. The T1200 was introduced as a refresh to the Quadro T1000 together with the new Ampere RTX A workstation cards like the faster Nvidia RTX A2000.

It is available in different variants from 35 - 95 Watt (TGP) with different clock speeds (and performance). The GPU supports DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 for external connections.

There is no more Max-Q variant (formerly used for the low power variants) but every OEM can choose to implement Max-Q 3.0 technologies (Dynamic Boost, WhisperMode).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games.

Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T1000 and T2000 do not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

When configured as a slow 35W variant, the T1200 is also suited for thin and light laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3
ArchitectureTuringTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified1024 - unified
Core Speed1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1
Transistors4700 Million
technology12 nm12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement27.05.2019 12.04.2021
Features3.7 TFLOPS SP max. performance, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x8, 192 GB/s memory bandwidth, Max-Q Technologies 3.0 optional
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz...

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (31%)     max: 13392 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (22%)     max: 13677 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (46%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (32%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (18%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (20%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (58%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (35%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (34%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (51%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (33%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (18%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (27%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (32%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (35%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (33%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (57%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 06:33:04

#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10683 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.013s ... 0.02s

#8 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10683 +0s ... 0.028s

#10 got single benchmarks 10683 +0s ... 0.028s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.033s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.033s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.035s

#15 return log +0.06s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)