Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

NVIDIA Quadro M500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M500M

The Nvidia Quadro M500M is a DirectX 12 (FL 11_0) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built on the GM108 chip with 384 shader cores and manufactured in 28 nm by TSMC. The Quadro M500M is the successor to the Quadro K620M which is also based on the Maxwell GM108 but lists a higher memory bandwidth of 16 vs. 14.4 GB/s. Therefore, it is also similar to the consumer GeForce 930M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than with GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90% of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. GM108 features 3 SMMs and thus 384 shader cores, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs (64-bit interface).

Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache. The larger size can reduce some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly hurting performance.

GM108 supports DirectX 11.2 (feature level 11.0 only) as well as DirectX 12.

Performance

The performance should be slightly below the Quadro K620M (same chip, but slightly more memory bandwidth) and therefore positioned in the entry-level of dedicated graphics chips. For 3D games the Quadro M500M should be similar to the GeForce 930M. Therefore, only low-demanding games should run fluently.

Features

The feature set should include support for up to four active displays. High-resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a (HDMI 2.0 not supported). HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

Using CUDA or OpenCL, the cores of the Quadro M500M can be used for general calculations.

GM108 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API).

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro M500M (and M600M, K620M) is rated at 30 W. Therefore, the GPU is best suited for laptops 13 - 14-inches in size and above. The M500M also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro M500M
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermi
ArchitectureFermiMaxwell
Pipelines240 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed900 MHz
Memory Speed625 MHz4004 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption75 Watt30 Watt
technology40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 15.12.2015

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M500M
0.7 pt (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
126522 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 24523     avg: 33578     median: 33578 (4%)     max: 42633 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5986     avg: 6299     median: 6359 (7%)     max: 6491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 8211     avg: 8403     median: 8348 (2%)     max: 8703 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1387     avg: 1401     median: 1391.5 (2%)     max: 1432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1585     avg: 1596     median: 1594.5 (2%)     max: 1610 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 26395     avg: 38225     median: 40554 (5%)     max: 45396 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1742 Points (2%)
min: 2350     avg: 2431     median: 2447 (3%)     max: 2478 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1539 Points (1%)
min: 2222     avg: 2341     median: 2364.5 (2%)     max: 2412 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
7959 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (4%)     max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
7181 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (19%)     max: 14387 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 11913     avg: 12378     median: 12377.5 (16%)     max: 12842 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 6.1     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (2%)     max: 6.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 21     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (7%)     max: 21.7 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 19.1     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (9%)     max: 20 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 28.4     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (5%)     max: 28.9 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 24.74     avg: 26.3     median: 24.8 (15%)     max: 29.41 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 25.48     avg: 28.9     median: 25.5 (14%)     max: 35.63 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 34.95     avg: 36.6     median: 35.1 (27%)     max: 39.63 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 14.61     avg: 14.8     median: 14.9 (18%)     max: 14.98 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 42.62     avg: 44.2     median: 43 (32%)     max: 46.88 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 38.69     avg: 41.5     median: 38.8 (42%)     max: 46.9 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 16.84     avg: 18.1     median: 16.9 (8%)     max: 20.44 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
24.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 32.55     avg: 34.5     median: 32.7 (17%)     max: 38.08 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 29.64     avg: 34.1     median: 35.5 (9%)     max: 37.22 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 16.01     avg: 20.8     median: 19.1 (3%)     max: 27.21 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 5.46     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 6.9 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 6.82     avg: 7.8     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 9.51 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 11.14     avg: 11.6     median: 11.2 (3%)     max: 12.43 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.35     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.53 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 17.92     avg: 21     median: 20.6 (8%)     max: 24.47 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 18.35     avg: 19.9     median: 20 (3%)     max: 21.42 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 5476     avg: 6461     median: 6602 (5%)     max: 7305 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (16%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
min: 28.44     avg: 35.2     median: 37.5 (13%)     max: 39.77 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.89     avg: 41.2     median: 40.7 (2%)     max: 48.45 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
28.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
53.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
67.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
129.5 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 328     avg: 353.3     median: 354 (2%)     max: 378 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 618     avg: 804     median: 850 (1%)     max: 945 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1690     avg: 1741     median: 1741 (2%)     max: 1792 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 117% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
49.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
28.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
22.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
30.3  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
18.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
10.4  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
46.9 65.4 ~ 56 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
32.4 38.2 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
19.2 20.2 ~ 20 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
11.9 13.1 ~ 13 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
35.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
29.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
16.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
14.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
56.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
33.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
13  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
27  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
29 30.5 ~ 30 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
17.9 18.9 ~ 18 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
9.9 10.2 ~ 10 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
82.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
19.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
33.7 35 ~ 34 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
22.9 23.4 ~ 23 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
18.6 19.1 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
9.2 9.6 ~ 9 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
62.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
48.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
42.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
10.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
48.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
38.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
22.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
11.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
89.1 89.9 94.9 ~ 91 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
50.1 50.2 54 ~ 51 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
40.3 40.5 43.8 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
13.8 13.8 14.7 ~ 14 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
217.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
93.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
48.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
24.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
137.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
62.7  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
34.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
17.3  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro M500M:
78.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
57  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro M500M:
45.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
27.5  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro M500Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Overwatch49.128.322.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider30.318.610.4
Rainbow Six Siege56352013
Just Cause 335.629.616.214.5
Star Wars Battlefront56.533.315.213
Batman: Arkham Knight2721107
The Witcher 3301810
Dirt Rally82.632.819.512.7
Thief3423199
Total War: Rome II62.648.142.310.5
Metro: Last Light48.938.322.911.6
BioShock Infinite91514214
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm217.593.648.724.2
Tomb Raider137.862.734.417.3
Mafia 278.55745.827.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
8
4
2
6
7
2
10
5

12








NVIDIA Quadro 3000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11206.2127.3
Metro 203353.811.5
Risen66.739.630.4
Need for Speed Shift104.870.943.3
Colin McRae: DIRT 2113.571.440
Anno 1404187.652.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1

1
3

1
2
1
1
4

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 09:18:03

#0 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7063 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.079s ... 0.08s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.08s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.08s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.026s ... 0.106s

#8 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.008s ... 0.114s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7063 +0.02s ... 0.134s

#10 got single benchmarks 7063 +0.014s ... 0.147s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.147s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.253s ... 0.4s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.4s

#14 Got 91 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.412s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.412s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.427s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.05s ... 0.477s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.477s

#19 return log +0.055s ... 0.531s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)