Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8320 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs PowerVR GE8300

PowerVR GE8320

► remove from comparison

The PowerVR GE8320 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API and Vulkan 1.0.

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

PowerVR GE8300

► remove from comparison

The PowerVR GE8300 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API and Vulkan 1.0.

PowerVR GE8320Qualcomm Adreno 680PowerVR GE8300
PowerVR Series8XE Series
PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 @ 0.57 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitecturePowerVR Series8XEPowerVR Series8XE
Core Speed400 - 650 (Boost) MHz660 MHz
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 12DirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology20 nm7 nm20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API SupportOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Date of Announcement09.09.2014 06.12.2018 09.09.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.imgtec.comwww.imgtec.com
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G368 x 2200 MHz? MHz680 MHz
min. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHz
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHz
CPU in PowerVR GE8300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC Tiger T3104 x 1800 MHz? MHz800 MHz
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67614 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT8766B4 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D4 x 1800 MHz? MHz550 MHz
min. - max.? - 650 MHz550 - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6785     avg: 11520     median: 11994 (1%)     max: 13939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 6867     avg: 7128     median: 7128 (1%)     max: 7389 Points
4908 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
9534 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 494     avg: 806     median: 812 (4%)     max: 1214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 445     avg: 750     median: 765 (2%)     max: 881 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 302     avg: 499.1     median: 493 (2%)     max: 1166 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 253     avg: 424.8     median: 429 (1%)     max: 516 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 244     avg: 709     median: 732 (7%)     max: 2061 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 205     avg: 625     median: 659 (4%)     max: 801 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 178     avg: 402     median: 421 (2%)     max: 512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 145     avg: 343.2     median: 363 (1%)     max: 441 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (2%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (2%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.65 fps
min: 0.38     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.48 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.85     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.3     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (0%)     max: 7.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 3     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 3.7     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (0%)     max: 8.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 6.3     avg: 10.4     median: 11 (0%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 20     median: 20 (0%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8300
min: 9927     avg: 11148     median: 11148 (1%)     max: 12369 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
8.8 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
0 Points (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2578     avg: 7690     median: 6851 (2%)     max: 13202 Points
min: 2563     avg: 7985     median: 3272 (1%)     max: 27482 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 575     avg: 2472     median: 3094 (5%)     max: 3666 Points
min: 536     avg: 910     median: 678 (1%)     max: 1991 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 1.84     avg: 2.3     median: 2.2 (1%)     max: 2.91 Watt
min: 3.14     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.33 Watt

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8320 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 701% n=1

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8300 → 70% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
42  fps
105%
PowerVR GE8300:
44  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
48  fps
81%
PowerVR GE8300:
39  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
15  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
24 30 33.5 ~ 29 fps
103%
PowerVR GE8300:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
22 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps
96%
PowerVR GE8300:
21 25 26 ~ 24 fps
med.
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
22 23 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 24 fps
92%
PowerVR GE8300:
16 25 26 ~ 22 fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!) 0 (!) ~ 0 fps
PowerVR GE8300:
0 (!) 24 ~ 12 fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
30 31 31 56 ~ 37 fps
130%
PowerVR GE8300:
32 53 59 ~ 48 fps
ultra
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
29 30 31 43 ~ 33 fps
133%
PowerVR GE8300:
31 50 52 ~ 44 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
47 58 ~ 53 fps
72%
PowerVR GE8300:
38  fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
57  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
30  fps
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
30  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
28  fps
82%
PowerVR GE8300:
17 29 ~ 23 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
21 30 ~ 26 fps
88%
PowerVR GE8300:
23  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
10 19 27 28 ~ 21 fps
57%
PowerVR GE8300:
7 8.5 9 9.5 28 ~ 12 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
12 22 24 ~ 19 fps
53%
PowerVR GE8300:
8 9 14 ~ 10 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
24 24 26 ~ 25 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
44.5 59 ~ 52 fps

Average Gaming PowerVR GE8320 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming PowerVR GE8300 → 92%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 104%

PowerVR GE8320lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift42
Call of Duty Mobile48
Genshin Impact15
Armajet29
PUBG Mobile25240
Arena of Valor3733
Shadow Fight 35357
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2826
Asphalt 9: Legends2119
Real Racing 325
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
4

1


4
3


1







PowerVR GE8300lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift44
Call of Duty Mobile39
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile242212
Arena of Valor4844
Shadow Fight 338
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2323
Asphalt 9: Legends1210
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
4

1


3
2


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 09:56:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9411 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9838 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733302613s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:18:59 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.015s ... 0.015s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 +0.019s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 9411 +0.051s ... 0.085s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.001s ... 0.086s

#12 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.005s ... 0.09s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9838 +0s ... 0.091s

#14 got single benchmarks 9838 +0.019s ... 0.109s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.122s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.123s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.134s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.134s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.138s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.138s

#22 Got 92 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.152s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.152s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.153s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.157s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.157s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.158s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)