Alcatel 3L (2021) review - Entry-level smartphone with 48 MP camera
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Rating Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75.1 % | 7 | 05/2021 | Alcatel 3L 2021 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 194 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
75.2 % | 7 | 02/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A12 Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 205 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
76.3 % | 7 | 07/2020 | Alcatel 3L 2020 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 165 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.22" | 1520x720 | |
77.1 % | 7 | 01/2021 | Vivo Y20s SD 460, Adreno 610 | 192.3 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.51" | 1600x720 |
Case, equipment and operation
The workmanship and material selection of the Alcatel 3L (2021) looks more valuable than that of the Alcatel 1Seven though the glossy surface quickly turns out to be a fingerprint magnet. The build quality is good and leaves a solid impression. Unfortunately, the smartphone is 29 grams heavier than its predecessor.
In terms of features, TCL has finally added an ambient light sensor. The somewhat old-fashioned micro-USB port supports OTG and the microSD slot supports the exFAT file system. Since the card slot is a hybrid slot, the user has to decide between memory expansion or dual-SIM.
The operating system is Android 11 with the in-house Alcatel UI. During the review, we received an update that updated the security patches to a fairly current state from March 5, 2021. We do not expect another major update, and experience shows that security updates are distributed rather sporadically.
No NFC, only 2.4 GHz WLAN and LTE Cat. 4: TCL does not provide the Alcatel 3L with more than the bare essentials. While the cellular connection works flawlessly in the review, the Wi-Fi is usually very shaky and slow. The review with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12 confirms this.
The call quality of the Alcatel 3L (2021) is really good when held to the ear and convinces with a clear and natural voice reproduction. In speaker mode, the user of the Alcatel smartphone hears audible reverberations and must also not move too far away from the phone, otherwise it can only be heard very quietly. The suppression of ambient noise works quite well as long as it is not too loud. The 3L supports both VoLTE and WLAN calling.
The smartphone's capacitive touchscreen has good gliding properties and responds quite quickly to inputs. The physical keys have a short travel, but the soft pressure point is still clearly defined. A fingerprint scanner and 2D facial recognition are available for biometric security, both of which perform reliably for the most part.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Vivo Y20s | |
Alcatel 3L 2020 | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Vivo Y20s | |
Alcatel 3L 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 |
Cameras - trimmed-down triple camera in the Alcatel 3L
The front-facing camera of the Alcatel 3L (2021) enables much better selfies than its little sister 1S and delivers quite usable results in good lighting conditions.
Like last year, the triple camera has a 48 MP sensor. Unfortunately, the ultra-wide-angle has been dropped and the two additional lenses can rather be described as technical waste. However, decent snapshots are possible with the main camera.
Like in the 1S the Alcatel 3L also shows an unusual behavior when zooming. This is also completely different from other Android smartphones. For example, a two-fold magnification on a Huawei P40 Pro corresponds to a focal length of around 35 mm with an EOS 90D (APS-C), whereas it is 60 mm on the Alcatel.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow-LightIPS display for couch potatoes in the Alcatel 3L
The display of the Alcatel 3L (2021) has grown to 6.52 inches (16.56 cm) and has been equipped with an ambient light sensor, but it still works with the small HD resolution. However, the IPS panel's brightness is considerably lower than in the predecessor and does not even reach 300 cd/m². We have not seen such a dark smartphone display for a very long time and it is a bad compromise in our eyes if that is the price for the brightness sensor.
Even in the APL50 measurement (309 cd/m²) and with the sensor enabled (308 cd/m²), only minimally higher values are possible. The black level and contrast ratio are very good, but that does not help much on halfway bright days. The ambient light sensor is something for leisurely contemporaries because it sometimes needs a few seconds to react to the changed light conditions.
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 294 cd/m²
Contrast: 2100:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Alcatel 3L 2021 IPS, 1600x720, 6.52 | Samsung Galaxy A12 PLS-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50 | Alcatel 3L 2020 IPS, 1520x720, 6.22 | Vivo Y20s IPS, 1600x720, 6.51 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -34% | 7% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 64 ? -40% | 44.8 ? 2% | 54.4 ? -19% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31.6 ? | 40 ? -27% | 28 ? 11% | 34.4 ? -9% |
PWM Frequency | 337.8 ? | |||
Screen | -33% | -20% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 294 | 458 56% | 463 57% | 502 71% |
Brightness | 291 | 427 47% | 449 54% | 468 61% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 85 -11% | 91 -4% | 87 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.53 -279% | 0.25 -79% | 0.41 -193% |
Contrast | 2100 | 864 -59% | 1852 -12% | 1224 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 4.04 1% | 6 -46% | 2.6 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.7 | 6.84 -2% | 11.5 -72% | 4.8 28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.8 -14% | 6.5 -55% | 3.1 26% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.293 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.37 93% |
CCT | 6962 93% | 7535 86% | 8233 79% | 6470 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -34% /
-33% | -7% /
-14% | -9% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance, emissions and battery life
The Alcatel 3L (2021) again relies on the Helio P22 with 4 GB of working memory. The system actually runs smoother with a bit more RAM than in the Alcatel 1S (3 GB RAM). However, we do not want to raise high performance expectations at this point, but it is perfectly sufficient to master everyday use, although we would have wished for a more modern SoC.
The surface temperatures are already clearly above the 30-degree mark in idle and Alcatel's smartphone gets lukewarm under load, but never too hot.
The speaker on the bottom edge has a very high treble and is well suited for phone calls. Media playback, on the other hand, is not its area of expertise. The jack is good for this price range (SNR: 79.33 dBFS) and the audio codec support for Bluetooth (SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+ and LDAC) is also surprisingly broad.
Alcatel's 3L (2021) has to make considerable concessions in terms of battery runtimes compared with the predecessor, but it still achieves a good result in the review.
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4779 - 5126, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years) |
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
Alcatel 3L 2020 | |
Vivo Y20s | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (6.4 - 7.6, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
Alcatel 3L 2020 | |
Vivo Y20s | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (3.5 - 4.7, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
Alcatel 3L 2020 | |
Vivo Y20s | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (4.1 - 4.8, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | |
Samsung Galaxy A12 | |
Alcatel 3L 2020 | |
Vivo Y20s | |
Average Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 (1.3 - 1.6, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years) |
Alcatel 3L 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A12 | Alcatel 3L 2020 | Vivo Y20s | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 59% | -14% | 262% | 40% | 752% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 245.4 | 269.7 10% | 287.7 17% | 504 105% | 273 ? 11% | 1508 ? 515% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 136.6 | 211.6 55% | 173.4 27% | 214.8 57% | 176.8 ? 29% | 1118 ? 718% |
Random Read 4KB | 34.65 | 65.4 89% | 20.91 -40% | 141.7 309% | 59.1 ? 71% | 247 ? 613% |
Random Write 4KB | 21.58 | 39.1 81% | 8.68 -60% | 145.7 575% | 31.7 ? 47% | 272 ? 1160% |
Temperature
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Loudspeaker
Alcatel 3L 2021 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Vivo Y20s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery life
Alcatel 3L 2021 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A12 5000 mAh | Alcatel 3L 2020 4000 mAh | Vivo Y20s 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi Websurfing | 788 | 1288 63% | 1456 85% | 1445 83% | 914 ? 16% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - new edition with few innovations
The Alcatel 3L (2021) hardly differs from the 2020 model on the spec sheet. Processor and memory configuration are identical, the display grows a bit and can finally rely on an ambient light sensor. However, the new panel is dramatically darker than the predecessor's.
The Alcatel 3L (2021) has one or two problems, but it could be a cheap alternative if the price drops a bit.
The triple camera again uses a 48 MP sensor that enables decent pictures, but the ultra-wide-angle is omitted, so the two additional lenses do not offer any practical added value.
However, Alcatel's smartphone is particularly convincing in terms of telephony and offers a good basis with the memory expansion, including exFAT support, and an improved audio jack.
Price and availability
The Alcatel 3L (2021) is available in both color variants at Amazon available.
Alcatel 3L 2021
-
05/18/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt