Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i7-8650U vs Intel Processor N95

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

The Intel Processor N95 (sometimes also called Celeron N95 or Pentium N95) is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. Compared to the similar Processor N100, the N95 offers a slightly higher TDP and therefore maybe a slightly improved sustained performance.

Performance

The average N95 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium 7505 and the Core i3-1115G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. That's not a great result, to put it mildly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N95 has a base power consumption of 12 W (compared to the 6 W of the N100) and is therefore well suited for thin and light systems. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N200Intel Core i7-8650UIntel Processor N95
CodenameAlder Lake-NKaby Lake RefreshAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Kaby Lake RefreshIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz1900 - 4200 MHz <=3400 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 84 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
SocketBGA1356BGA1264
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
$409 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.8 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
24.9 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
133%
1 N95 +
60 Points (34%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
200%
1 N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
197%
1 N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
132%
1 N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (38%)     max: 935 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
132%
1 N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (38%)     max: 357 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
190%
1 N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
203%
N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (47%)     max: 178 Points
134%
N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (42%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
203%
N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 2.04 Points
135%
N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (43%)     max: 1.86 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
121%
N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
184%
N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
21677 Points (14%)
200%
N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (14%)     max: 22275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
6864 Points (8%)
127%
N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
163%
N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
152%
N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
110%
N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
170%
1 N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
118%
1 N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (13%)     max: 41.98 fps
199%
N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (11%)     max: 32.45 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N200 +
80 fps (18%)
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
203%
N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (37%)     max: 163.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
209%
1 N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
84%
N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
85%
N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
84%
N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
197%
1 N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
193%
1 N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
137%
1 N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
153%
N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
97%
N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
106%
N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
123%
N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
19125 Points (15%)
154%
N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (11%)     max: 14929 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (17%)     max: 8887 Points
205%
N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (14%)     max: 5806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
168%
N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
162%
N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (47%)     max: 58675 Points
141%
N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (41%)     max: 49955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
148%
N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
144%
N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
188%
N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
128%
1 N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (31%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
178%
1 N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (11%)     max: 3114 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
138%
1 N95 +
min: 902     avg: 1109     median: 1177 (37%)     max: 1181 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
207%
1 N95 +
min: 2661     avg: 2835     median: 2850.5 (12%)     max: 2978 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
928 Points (36%)
108%
1 N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (39%)     max: 1013 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
167%
1 N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
111%
1 N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
167%
1 N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
98%
1 N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
102%
1 N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (10%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
138%
N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (26%)     max: 42822 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (35%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
227 Points (41%)
104%
N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (32%)     max: 183.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (23%)
124%
1 N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
58%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
65%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
83%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
131%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 194% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 147% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 12:41:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751020896s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:19:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.015s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.009s ... 0.045s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.07s ... 0.115s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.115s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)