Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP24 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644

ARM Mali-G78 MP24

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP24

The ARM Mali-G78MP24 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (e.g. Huawei Mate 40). It integrates all of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 644
Adreno 600 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhallAdreno 600
Pipelines24 - unified
Shared Memorynoyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology5 nm14 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement26.05.2020 15.12.2015 07.05.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Mali-G78 MP24GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 90008 x 2050 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
275 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6923 Points (3%)
482 Points (0%)
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
123332 Points (12%)
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11895 Points (52%)
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
17612 Points (39%)
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9643 Points (41%)
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (5%)     max: 1499 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12146 Points (30%)
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (2%)     max: 1303 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
11256 Points (100%)
min: 1606     avg: 1849     median: 1745 (16%)     max: 2285 Points
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
16670 Points (100%)
min: 1427     avg: 1715     median: 1594 (10%)     max: 2173 Points
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
9138 Points (45%)
min: 937     avg: 1108     median: 978 (5%)     max: 1480 Points
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
11573 Points (39%)
min: 823     avg: 952     median: 829 (3%)     max: 1286 Points
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (3%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (4%)
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
170281 Points (12%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (6%)     max: 23891 Points
30029 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (11%)     max: 15659 Points
42541 Points (56%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 10% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 56% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP24:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
112%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 612:
40  fps
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP24:
40  fps
75%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
100%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
high
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 63%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 106%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 106%

ARM Mali-G78 MP24Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet603067
PUBG Mobile404030604040
Dead Trigger 26060
Subway Surfers61
ARM Mali-G78 MP24Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 644
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





2
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 03. 11:13:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10564 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767435187s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 Jan 2026 05:18:57 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.023s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10564 +0.025s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 10564 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.053s

#12 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.007s ... 0.06s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.06s

#14 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.008s ... 0.068s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.093s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.093s

#18 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.098s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.098s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.098s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.101s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.101s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.102s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)