ARM Mali-G77 MP11 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ARM Mali-G72 MP12
ARM Mali-G77 MP11 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G77MP11 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Samsung Exynos 990 (e.g. Galaxy S20 series). It integrates 11 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation.
The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G77 MP11 Qualcomm Adreno 685 ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Mali-G Series Codename Valhall Architecture Valhall Bifrost Pipelines 11 - unified 12 - unified Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 7 nm 7 nm 16 nm Date of Announcement 19.03.2020 06.12.2018 18.10.2017 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com Power Consumption 7 Watt Core Speed 850 MHz
CPU in Adreno 685 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Microsoft SQ1 8 x 3000 MHz ? MHz ? MHz
CPU in Mali-G72 MP12 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo HiSilicon Kirin 970 8 x 2400 MHz ? MHz ? MHz
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 48476 avg: 74951 median: 82052.5 (9%) max: 87223 Points
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7385 avg: 7798 median: 7576 (33%) max: 8485 Points
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9470 avg: 10329 median: 9536 (21%) max: 11868 Points
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6638 avg: 7083 median: 7076 (35%) max: 7459 Points
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 870 avg: 7112 median: 8239 (25%) max: 9190 Points
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4162 avg: 4222 median: 4221.5 (2%) max: 4281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1391 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 21.8 median: 22 (4%) max: 23 fps
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 43 avg: 53.4 median: 56 (4%) max: 58 fps
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 38 avg: 47.6 median: 50 (6%) max: 51 fps
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 65 avg: 77.4 median: 80 (2%) max: 85 fps
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 96 avg: 108.8 median: 108 (6%) max: 126 fps
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP11 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 145 avg: 186.8 median: 199 (2%) max: 200 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
222645 Points (28%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
71.6 fps (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP11 → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 57% n=2 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 57% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
40 40 60 ~ 47 fps
68%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
40 fps
85%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
72%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
83%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
87 fps
43%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP11:
60 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP11 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 71% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 77%
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 16:26:57
#0 checking url part for id 10328 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.127s ... 0.127s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.127s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.127s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10328 +0.038s ... 0.165s
#9 got single benchmarks 10328 +0.019s ... 0.184s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.002s ... 0.186s
#11 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.007s ... 0.193s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.002s ... 0.194s
#13 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.02s ... 0.214s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.214s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.124s ... 0.338s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.338s
#17 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.351s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.351s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.355s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.379s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.379s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.381s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)