Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G76 MP16 vs Qualcomm Adreno 643 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP6

ARM Mali-G76 MP16

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP16

The ARM Mali-G76 MP16 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Kirin 990 5G and according to Huawei should be about 6% faster and 20% more efficient than a Adreno 640 in a Snapdragon 855. It integrates 16 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 643

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 643

The Qualcomm Adreno 643 is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) that is used in the Qualcomm QCM6490 and QCS6490. The SoC is not only intended for use in Android-based smartphones and tablets, but also for IoT products with Linux, Ubuntu or Windows 11 IoT Enterprise. In the QCM6490 and QCS6490 the 643 clocks at 812 MHz.

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP6

The ARM Mali-G52 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2019 in the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 810) is comparable to the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 and G76MP4 in the Helio G90T.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G76 MP16Qualcomm Adreno 643ARM Mali-G52 MP6
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines16 - unified6 - unified
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Vulkan 1.x
technology7 nm6 nm12 nm
Date of Announcement31.08.2018 12.08.2021 06.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed812 MHz
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G76 MP16GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G8 x ? MHz? MHz700 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9908 x ? MHz? MHz600 MHz
min. - max.? MHz600 - 700 MHz
CPU in Adreno 643GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm QCM64908 x 1960 MHz812 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8108 x 1880 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 60860     avg: 71882     median: 70607.5 (8%)     max: 82652 Points
min: 45182     avg: 46563     median: 46944 (5%)     max: 47563 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4213     avg: 5790     median: 5785 (25%)     max: 7286 Points
min: 3314     avg: 3463     median: 3483 (15%)     max: 3591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4064     avg: 6079     median: 6119.5 (13%)     max: 7970 Points
min: 3274     avg: 3389     median: 3406 (7%)     max: 3488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4422     avg: 5738     median: 6261 (31%)     max: 6508 Points
6499 Points (32%)
min: 2515     avg: 2810     median: 2954 (15%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4356     avg: 6136     median: 6631.5 (20%)     max: 6771 Points
7131 Points (21%)
min: 2328     avg: 2626     median: 2752 (8%)     max: 2798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3310     avg: 3313     median: 3312.5 (2%)     max: 3315 Points
3135 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
887 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
8.2 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 28.5     median: 19 (3%)     max: 68 fps
18 fps (3%)
min: 7.7     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 41     avg: 67.3     median: 49.5 (4%)     max: 165 fps
49 fps (4%)
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 32     avg: 40.2     median: 42 (5%)     max: 44 fps
40 fps (5%)
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 20 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 33     avg: 55.2     median: 53.5 (1%)     max: 75 fps
69 fps (1%)
min: 33     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 97.7     median: 103 (6%)     max: 118 fps
90 fps (5%)
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (3%)     max: 53 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP16
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 135     avg: 146.8     median: 151.5 (1%)     max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 643
159 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP6
min: 85     avg: 87     median: 87 (1%)     max: 89 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
192996 Points (24%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 52.6     avg: 53.4     median: 53.3 (0%)     max: 54.4 fps
51.8 fps (0%)
21.1 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
8.6 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
2937 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
3054 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
14976 Points (15%)
11576 Points (12%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
5015 Points (9%)
3831 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.9 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP16 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 102% n=9

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 47% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 643:
58  fps
med.
Adreno 643:
40  fps
ultra
Adreno 643:
38  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 643:
60  fps
67%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
40  fps
100%
Adreno 643:
40  fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30 30 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
108%
Adreno 643:
40  fps
81%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Mali-G52 MP6:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 643:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G52 MP6:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP16:
60  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP16 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 102%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 87%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

Qualcomm Adreno 643lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact584038
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

2


1
1

1







ARM Mali-G76 MP16lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile604037
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor3030
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends30
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


2
3

1







ARM Mali-G52 MP6lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile404030
World of Tanks Blitz60
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1

1


2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 01. 10:28:16

#0 checking url part for id 9950 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11804 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10362 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.216s ... 0.217s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.217s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.217s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9950 +0.063s ... 0.28s

#9 got single benchmarks 9950 +0.026s ... 0.306s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11804 +0.002s ... 0.308s

#11 got single benchmarks 11804 +0.008s ... 0.316s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10362 +0.002s ... 0.318s

#13 got single benchmarks 10362 +0.011s ... 0.329s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.329s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.144s ... 0.473s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.473s

#17 Got 43 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.496s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.496s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.499s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.517s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.517s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.519s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)