ARM Mali-G52 MP1 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ARM Mali-G77 MP9
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.
The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.
The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G77MP9 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 (and 1000+). It integrates 9 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation (G76).
The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 Qualcomm Adreno 685 ARM Mali-G77 MP9 Mali-G Series Architecture Bifrost Valhall Pipelines 1 - unified 9 - unified Core Speed 800 (Boost) MHz Shared Memory no yes no technology 12 nm 7 nm 7 nm Date of Announcement 29.07.2020 06.12.2018 19.03.2020 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com API DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 Power Consumption 7 Watt Codename Valhall
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 13089 avg: 14037 median: 13379.5 (2%) max: 16301 Points
60765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 950 avg: 1287 median: 1275 (6%) max: 2142 Points
min: 7612 avg: 8312 median: 8226 (36%) max: 9182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 834 avg: 1165 median: 1143.5 (3%) max: 2001 Points
min: 9823 avg: 11258 median: 11692.5 (26%) max: 11824 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 605 avg: 893 median: 915 (5%) max: 1516 Points
min: 6890 avg: 7321 median: 7393.5 (37%) max: 7606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 508 avg: 766 median: 787.5 (2%) max: 1339 Points
min: 7501 avg: 8264 median: 8477 (25%) max: 8601 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 410 avg: 470.6 median: 426 (0%) max: 716 Points
min: 4194 avg: 4405 median: 4405 (2%) max: 4578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 111 avg: 126.7 median: 117 (0%) max: 181 Points
min: 1205 avg: 1258 median: 1256 (1%) max: 1300 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6 avg: 0.9 median: 0.9 (0%) max: 0.96 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.4 (4%) max: 9.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4 avg: 2.1 median: 2.1 (0%) max: 3.7 fps
min: 9.7 avg: 19.6 median: 21 (4%) max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 3.9 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (0%) max: 11 fps
min: 46 avg: 51.3 median: 51.5 (4%) max: 56 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.2 avg: 5.9 median: 6 (1%) max: 8.8 fps
min: 39 avg: 44.5 median: 44.5 (5%) max: 50 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.6 avg: 9.4 median: 9.4 (0%) max: 15 fps
min: 45 avg: 69.8 median: 78 (2%) max: 79 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 15.6 median: 16 (1%) max: 26 fps
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 49 avg: 101.5 median: 115 (7%) max: 129 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 19 avg: 24.8 median: 24 (0%) max: 42 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9
min: 176 avg: 185.4 median: 182.5 (1%) max: 202 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 0 avg: 16041 median: 22462 (3%) max: 25274 Points
min: 194863 avg: 220826 median: 221937 (28%) max: 248060 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 9.57 avg: 12.7 median: 12.7 (0%) max: 15.81 fps
min: 44.45 avg: 56.6 median: 53.8 (0%) max: 71.3 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
24.8 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
4700 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
4718 Points (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3562 avg: 15210 median: 15410 (15%) max: 24108 Points
min: 24859 avg: 29891 median: 29132.5 (29%) max: 36439 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1293 avg: 10223 median: 11400 (20%) max: 16564 Points
min: 24901 avg: 32263 median: 32888 (58%) max: 38376 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 3D Graphics Mark
28414 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0 avg: 3.3 median: 2.7 (1%) max: 7.07 Watt
min: 0 avg: 5.1 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 448% n=2 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 740% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
158%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 [X] Xiaomi 11T 1.61.6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
59.3 [X] OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
57 fps, P1:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
60 119 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
233%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50 59 [X] Xiaomi 11T 3.1.2a
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 56 fps
Mali-G77 MP9:
119 144 ~ 132 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 171% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 171%
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 56.5 Armajet 60 PUBG Mobile 59 40 37 Asphalt 9: Legends 50 56 Real Racing 3 60 Subway Surfers 132 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.27
log 16. 00:45:55
#0 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10491 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.24s ... 0.241s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.241s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.241s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.088s ... 0.33s
#9 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.041s ... 0.37s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.002s ... 0.373s
#11 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.008s ... 0.381s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10491 +0.002s ... 0.383s
#13 got single benchmarks 10491 +0.052s ... 0.435s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.435s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.208s ... 0.643s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.643s
#17 Got 63 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.666s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.666s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.672s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.696s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.696s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.698s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)