Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 685 ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Qualcomm Adreno 619L Adreno 600 Series Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan Power Consumption 7 Watt technology 7 nm 16 nm 8 nm Date of Announcement 06.12.2018 18.10.2017 15.12.2015 Architecture Bifrost Adreno 600 Pipelines 12 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
5.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
26 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
13095 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
1751 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 128% n=2 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 79% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 10. 01:49:24
#0 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.193s ... 0.194s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.194s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.194s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.045s ... 0.239s
#9 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.007s ... 0.246s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.002s ... 0.248s
#11 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.024s ... 0.272s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.002s ... 0.274s
#13 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.011s ... 0.285s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.285s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.146s ... 0.431s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.431s
#17 Got 37 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.447s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.447s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.451s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.474s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.474s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.476s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)