Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L

Qualcomm Adreno 685

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 685

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 685Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
Power Consumption7 Watt
technology7 nm8 nm
Date of Announcement06.12.2018 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 600
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
CPU in Adreno 685GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Microsoft SQ18 x 3000 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (12%)     max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (6%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
31.7 fps (2%)
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
167.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (0%)     max: 22.85 fps
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 79% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 619Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends29
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1

1
1
2


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 04:14:34

#0 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.205s ... 0.206s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.206s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.206s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0.035s ... 0.241s

#8 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.008s ... 0.248s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.002s ... 0.25s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.012s ... 0.263s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.263s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.346s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.346s

#14 Got 10 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.351s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.352s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.354s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.367s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.367s

#19 return log +0.103s ... 0.47s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)