Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs ARM Mali-G77 MP9 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP1

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

ARM Mali-G77 MP9

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G77 MP9

The ARM Mali-G77MP9 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 (and 1000+). It integrates 9 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation (G76).

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G52 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP1

The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 612ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Mali-G Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureAdreno 600ValhallBifrost
Shared Memoryyesnono
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology14 nm7 nm12 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 19.03.2020 29.07.2020
CodenameValhall
Pipelines9 - unified1 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G77 MP9GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 80508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 13008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 12008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC T6128 x 1800 MHz614 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 8508 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
JLQ JR5108 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT81684 x 2000 MHz? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz800 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
60765 Points (7%)
min: 13089     avg: 14037     median: 13379.5 (2%)     max: 16301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
min: 7612     avg: 8312     median: 8226 (36%)     max: 9182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
min: 9823     avg: 11258     median: 11692.5 (26%)     max: 11824 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (6%)     max: 1499 Points
min: 6890     avg: 7321     median: 7393.5 (37%)     max: 7606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (3%)     max: 1303 Points
min: 7501     avg: 8264     median: 8477 (25%)     max: 8601 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 9.7 fps
min: 0.6     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
min: 9.57     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (0%)     max: 15.81 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
24.8 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
4700 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
4718 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (17%)     max: 23891 Points
min: 24859     avg: 29891     median: 29132.5 (29%)     max: 36439 Points
min: 3562     avg: 15210     median: 15410 (15%)     max: 24108 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (15%)     max: 15659 Points
min: 24901     avg: 32263     median: 32888 (58%)     max: 38376 Points
min: 1293     avg: 10223     median: 11400 (20%)     max: 16564 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 3D Graphics Mark
28414 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 5.1     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 557% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 76% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G77 MP9:
56.5  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
200%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 59.3 60 119 ~ 60 fps
127%
Mali-G52 MP1:
27.5 29.5 30 32 33 40 56 59 ~ 38 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 612:
40  fps
148%
Mali-G77 MP9:
58.9 59 59 60 ~ 59 fps
78%
Mali-G52 MP1:
19 20 25 28 30 36 39 39 40 ~ 31 fps
med.
Mali-G77 MP9:
40  fps
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
123%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 39.9 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
87%
Mali-G52 MP1:
16 17.5 21 27.5 28 29 30 30 30 33 ~ 26 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G52 MP1:
30  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60  fps
low 1280x720
Mali-G52 MP1:
19  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G52 MP1:
27  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
200%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50  fps
116%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
243%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50 59 60 ~ 56 fps
104%
Mali-G52 MP1:
17 25.5 29 ~ 24 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Mali-G77 MP9:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G77 MP9:
119 144 ~ 132 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 183%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 183%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 102%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

ARM Mali-G77 MP9lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal56.5
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile594037
Asphalt 9: Legends5056
Real Racing 360
Subway Surfers132
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3


1


2
2
1









Qualcomm Adreno 612lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile4030
Shadow Fight 360
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends2523
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
2
2









ARM Mali-G52 MP1lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet38
PUBG Mobile313126
Arena of Valor30
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)19
Asphalt 8: Airborne27
Asphalt 9: Legends2924
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
2


1

2
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 15. 19:12:30

#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10491 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.136s ... 0.137s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.137s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.137s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.041s ... 0.178s

#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.021s ... 0.199s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10491 +0.002s ... 0.2s

#11 got single benchmarks 10491 +0.044s ... 0.245s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.002s ... 0.247s

#13 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.033s ... 0.28s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.28s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.166s ... 0.445s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.445s

#17 Got 72 rows for game benchmarks. +0.029s ... 0.474s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.474s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.48s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.503s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.503s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.505s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)