Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9420e vs Intel Core i7-7820HK

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

Intel Core i7-7820HK

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7820HK

The Intel Core i7-7820HK is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest model of the consumer series at the time of the announcement. Only the i7-7920HQ and Xeon E3-1535M v6 are faster. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 2.9 - 3.9 GHz (4 cores up to 3.5 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.7 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to the Core i7-7820HQ, the 7820HK lacks business features like vPro or TXT support.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the higher clock speeds, the performance of the i7-7820HK is slightly faster than the old Skylake top model Core i7-6920HQ (2.9 - 3.8 GHz). The performance is sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

ModelAMD A9-9420eIntel Core i7-7820HK
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e « - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK « 2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock <=2500? MHz2900 - 3900 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 8
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketBGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L1 Cache256 KB
L3 Cache8 MB
TDP45 Watt
$378 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
min: 689     avg: 773     median: 770 (5%)     max: 867 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 156     avg: 162.7     median: 162 (49%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 8.34     avg: 8.6     median: 8.4 (11%)     max: 9.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.85 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6062     avg: 6231     median: 6182 (37%)     max: 6566 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 22793     avg: 23622     median: 23046.5 (17%)     max: 26081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 32769     avg: 34129.5     median: 34129.5 (24%)     max: 35490 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8465     avg: 8558.5     median: 8558.5 (10%)     max: 8652 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 179.4     avg: 234.7     median: 214.3 (3%)     max: 330.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.668     avg: 10.4     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 17.8 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
215.4 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
17.8 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5114     avg: 5135     median: 5134.5 (8%)     max: 5155 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 46     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (16%)     max: 47.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 177     avg: 178.8     median: 178.8 (41%)     max: 180.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.416     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.609 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.71     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.831 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (11%)     max: 4.3 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7957     avg: 8098     median: 8038 (17%)     max: 8360 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (2%)     max: 10.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.67     avg: 21.7     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 490.5     avg: 529     median: 535 (2%)     max: 550 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30280 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9542     avg: 10034     median: 10019 (27%)     max: 10523 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51307     avg: 53563     median: 52699.5 (43%)     max: 59600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50796     avg: 53623     median: 52515.5 (43%)     max: 59482 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 51327     avg: 54058     median: 52784.5 (44%)     max: 60127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7905     avg: 8141     median: 8001.5 (20%)     max: 9050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11041     avg: 11381     median: 11174 (20%)     max: 12592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4259     avg: 4439     median: 4447 (19%)     max: 4568 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4841     avg: 4897     median: 4896.5 (49%)     max: 4952 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15838     avg: 16002     median: 16001.5 (18%)     max: 16165 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4867     avg: 4905     median: 4904.5 (67%)     max: 4942 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15042     avg: 15309     median: 15308.5 (37%)     max: 15575 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14323     avg: 15088     median: 14476 (26%)     max: 16465 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3718     avg: 4002     median: 3926 (77%)     max: 4361 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14990 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3885 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 901     avg: 2277     median: 984 (1%)     max: 7545 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 68.3     avg: 138.2     median: 71.1 (1%)     max: 400.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 35189     avg: 38766     median: 39000 (35%)     max: 40652 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7820HK → 794% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 15. 20:07:35

#0 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8415 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.007s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8415 +0.004s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 8415 +0.064s ... 0.109s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.035s ... 0.144s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.147s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.052s ... 0.2s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.074s ... 0.274s

#15 return log +0.052s ... 0.326s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)