NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ► remove from comparison
The Nvidia Quadro M2200 is a mid-range DirectX 12 (FL 12_1) and OpenGL 4.5-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Maxwell-based GPU built most likely on the GM206 chip with 1024 shader cores. Therefore, the GPU is similar to the consumer Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (second generation) . The Quadro M2200M is built for the Intel Kaby Lake generation.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better compared to GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
Performance
The maximum core clock of the Quadro M2200 is 1038 MHz. The performance is between the old Quadro M2000M and Quadro M3000M , but generally closer to the latter (sometimes even on par). It is not surprising that the gaming performance is comparable to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M (Ti) and it is just behind the new GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).
Using CUDA (Compute Capability 5.0) or OpenCL 1.2 , the cores of the Quadro M2200 can be used for general calculations.
Power Consumption
The power consumption of the Quadro M2200 is rated at a TGP of 55 Watt (39.1 Watt TDP) – similar to the previous Quadro M2000M – and therefore best suited for 15-inch laptops and up.
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.
The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.
The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations .
Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.
To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).
As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, the 5000M likely shares many similarities to the GeForce GTX 480M which offers more CUDA cores. The Quadro is the first mobile GPU that offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.
The Quadro series also offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.
The shader/CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 5000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.
Furthermore, the Quadro 5000M is compatible with Nvidia 3D Vision Pro for stereoscopic viewing.
Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore usually reserved for large laptops with ample cooling, such as the Clevo D901F .
At the time of arrival (mid 2010), the Quadro 5000M was the fastest professional workstation graphics card for laptops and is the successor to the old G92b-based GeForce FX 3800M . Compared to desktop Quadro cards, the mobile Quadro 5000M offers less shader cores and likely a lower core clock rate as well.
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro 3000M NVIDIA Quadro 5000M Quadro M Series Codename N17P-Q3 Fermi Fermi Architecture Maxwell Fermi Fermi Pipelines 1024 - unified 240 - unified 320 - unified Core Speed 694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz 450 MHz 405 MHz Memory Speed 5508 MHz 625 MHz 1200 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 GDDR5 GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB 2048 MB 2048 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5 DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 Power Consumption 55 Watt 75 Watt 100 Watt Transistors 4.9 Billion 3 Billion technology 28 nm 40 nm 40 nm Features Optimus,
PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus OpenGl 4.1, FP32 OpenGL 4.1, DirectX 11, DirectCompute, OpenCL, CUDA, AXE, Error-Correction-Codes (ECC)-Memory, IEEE-Double-Precision-Floating-Point, PowerMizer 9.0 Notebook Size large large large Date of Announcement 13.01.2017 22.02.2011 27.07.2010 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com Shader Speed 900 MHz 810 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.7 pt (8%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845 avg: 1889 median: 1903 (5%) max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699 avg: 1724 median: 1724 (5%) max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203 avg: 289176 median: 289176 (33%) max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388 avg: 21012 median: 20644 (22%) max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877 avg: 37505 median: 37796 (10%) max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232 avg: 5253 median: 5252 (9%) max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786 avg: 5835 median: 5850 (7%) max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867 avg: 195445 median: 195444 (23%) max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453 avg: 7581 median: 7581 (11%) max: 7709 Points
1742 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319 avg: 7372 median: 7372 (6%) max: 7425 Points
1539 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 7700 avg: 7767 median: 7766.5 (2%) max: 7833 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 6604 avg: 6661 median: 6660.5 (4%) max: 6717 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
7015 Points (4%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
41650 Points (22%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value HP EliteBook 8740w 820QM Quadro 5000M 405/810 / 1200 MHz 2 GB 16 GB 41650
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
18903 Points (21%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value HP EliteBook 8740w 820QM Quadro 5000M 405/810 / 1200 MHz 2 GB 16 GB 18903
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834 avg: 28150 median: 28149.5 (37%) max: 29465 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 14054 avg: 14221 median: 14220.5 (19%) max: 14387 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 2630QM Quadro 3000M 2 GB 4 GB 14054 Dell Precision M6600 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 2720QM Quadro 3000M 8 GB 14387
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
12967 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 HP Elitebook 8740w (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 740QM Quadro 5000M 16 GB 12967
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
13127 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 HP EliteBook 8740w (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768) 820QM Quadro 5000M 405/810 / 1200 MHz 2 GB 16 GB 13127
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2 avg: 26.4 median: 27.9 (9%) max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 48.26 avg: 48.9 median: 48.9 (29%) max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 28.13 avg: 28.6 median: 28.6 (17%) max: 29 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 49.11 avg: 51 median: 51 (29%) max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 25.96 avg: 26.4 median: 26.4 (15%) max: 26.82 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 42.66 avg: 49.7 median: 49.7 (38%) max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 29.99 avg: 30.1 median: 30.1 (23%) max: 30.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.23 avg: 19.2 median: 19.2 (23%) max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 6.4 avg: 6.6 median: 6.6 (8%) max: 6.71 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.6 avg: 57.2 median: 57.2 (43%) max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 43.9 avg: 44.6 median: 44.6 (34%) max: 45.2 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 47.95 avg: 52.7 median: 52.7 (57%) max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 31.9 avg: 33.3 median: 33.3 (36%) max: 34.7 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 55.7 avg: 57.1 median: 57.1 (27%) max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 28.6 avg: 29 median: 29 (14%) max: 29.3 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.49 avg: 50.6 median: 50.6 (27%) max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
24.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
min: 25.1 avg: 26.9 median: 26.9 (14%) max: 28.7 fps
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3 avg: 90.3 median: 86.2 (21%) max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7 avg: 58.3 median: 58.1 (9%) max: 59 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14 avg: 32.2 median: 32.8 (7%) max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34 avg: 23.6 median: 24.6 (6%) max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93 avg: 47.4 median: 46.9 (13%) max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28 avg: 4.9 median: 5.2 (5%) max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2 avg: 69.3 median: 68.5 (27%) max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4 avg: 72.2 median: 72 (12%) max: 73.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.6 fps (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 45.4 avg: 45.5 median: 45.5 (16%) max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
32.7 fps (11%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9 avg: 107.4 median: 103.9 (6%) max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204 avg: 1276 median: 1306 (6%) max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086 avg: 2097 median: 2099 (4%) max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=12 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 47% n=12 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5000M → 49% n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
119 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3 fps
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2 fps
Quadro 3000M:
206.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
127.3 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
53.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
11.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
66.7 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
39.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
30.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
104.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
70.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
43.3 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
113.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
71.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
40 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
187.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Quadro 3000M:
52.4 [X] HP EliteBook 8760w LG671EA Intel Core i7-2630QM 2GHz
Quadro 3000M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Ghost Recon Wildlands 83.4 37.1 33.7 17.6 For Honor 78 54 51 37 14.6 Battlefield 1 139.4 105.3 47.1 42 Rise of the Tomb Raider 126 71 40 34 13.7 Rainbow Six Siege 214.2 131.2 70.4 52.4 Star Wars Battlefront 148.8 119 56.4 48.2 The Witcher 3 111 66 35 19 12.7 Thief 108.8 88.6 74.8 39.6 Battlefield 4 171.5 148.3 115.9 47.8 BioShock Infinite 250 176 152 58 Tomb Raider 381.4 238.8 149.3 70.2 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 7 2 5 4 6 3 2 2 8 1 3
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 206.2 127.3 Metro 2033 53.8 11.5 Risen 66.7 39.6 30.4 Need for Speed Shift 104.8 70.9 43.3 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 113.5 71.4 40 Anno 1404 187.6 52.4 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 27. 04:20:11
#0 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 1939 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:40:03 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.145s ... 0.146s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.146s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.146s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.057s ... 0.203s
#9 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.022s ... 0.225s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.002s ... 0.227s
#11 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.009s ... 0.236s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1939 +0.002s ... 0.237s
#13 got single benchmarks 1939 +0.011s ... 0.248s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.248s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.368s ... 0.616s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.616s
#17 Got 83 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.628s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.628s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.641s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.04s ... 0.681s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.681s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.683s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)