Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-7700K vs AMD A12-9720P

Intel Core i7-7700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7700K

The Intel Core i7-7700K is a fast quad-core processor for desktops based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the top model of the consumer Kaby-Lake-H series at the time of the announcement. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading (8 threads) support running at 4.2 - 4.5 GHz, the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the 200 (base) and 300 MHz (Boost) higher clock speed, respectively, the i7-7700K is a few percent faster than the old Skylake Core i7-6700K that offers the same per-MHz performance. Therefore, it is a very fast quad-core CPU that offers sufficient performance for all tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1150 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency slightly. Intel still specifies the TDP with 91 Watts, which is a lot more than the 45 Watts of the mobile Kaby-Lake-H CPUs.

AMD A12-9720P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9720P

The AMD A12-9720P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was introduced in 2017. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts, not verified) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.7 - 3.8 GHz (4.05 GHz for single core were briefly achievable in our test sample), a Radeon R7 iGPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average A12-9720P in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-4210U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, making the former a fairly slow chip that's suitable for basic day-to-day activities only as of late 2022.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAM, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9720P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelIntel Core i7-7700KAMD A12-9720P
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby LakeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Intel Core i7-7700K « 4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock4200 - 4500 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP91 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
SocketFCLGA1151FP4
FeaturesDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$339 U.S.
Announced
Transistors3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
465 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2200 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 897     avg: 940     median: 938.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
min: 229     avg: 234.5     median: 234.5 (1%)     max: 240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 190     avg: 192.3     median: 192.5 (58%)     max: 194 Points
min: 69     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (22%)     max: 76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.78     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (13%)     max: 10.91 Points
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.18     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.2 Points
min: 0.93     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (23%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7222     avg: 7305     median: 7304.5 (44%)     max: 7387 Points
min: 2640     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (17%)     max: 2846 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 28189     avg: 28903     median: 28903 (21%)     max: 29617 Points
min: 7200     avg: 7361     median: 7361 (5%)     max: 7522 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 169.8     avg: 173.1     median: 173.1 (2%)     max: 176.3 s
415.5 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 5.615 s
13 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5823 Points (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
61.6 fps (22%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
230 fps (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.54     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.554 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.919     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (16%)     max: 0.939 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.4     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.5 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10156 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.11     avg: 8.2     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 8.22 s
min: 17.77     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (4%)     max: 21.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.3     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (1%)     max: 18.41 s
min: 39.77     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (2%)     max: 48.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
440 s (2%)
min: 864     avg: 902     median: 901.5 (4%)     max: 939 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9975     avg: 11450     median: 11813 (32%)     max: 12026 Points
2761 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64424     avg: 65351     median: 65408 (53%)     max: 66220 Points
25648 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
66177 Points (54%)
24747 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67714 Points (57%)
min: 24457     avg: 27079     median: 27079 (23%)     max: 29701 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9230     avg: 9587     median: 9558 (24%)     max: 9974 Points
min: 2258     avg: 2330     median: 2329.5 (6%)     max: 2401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13137     avg: 13702     median: 13672.5 (24%)     max: 14325 Points
min: 3179     avg: 3265     median: 3264.5 (6%)     max: 3350 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5276     avg: 5383     median: 5383 (23%)     max: 5490 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5480 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17800 Points (43%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
18800 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4700 Points (70%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
12169 Points (98%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
10472 Points (95%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17576 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
17183 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
15476 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
769 ms (1%)
2422 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
52 ms (1%)
min: 146.6     avg: 192.1     median: 192.1 (2%)     max: 237.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14783     avg: 16961     median: 16960.5 (15%)     max: 19138 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7.8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7700K → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9720P → 54% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 12:32:10

#0 checking url part for id 8421 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9192 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8421 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 8421 +0.018s ... 0.06s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9192 +0.002s ... 0.062s

#9 got single benchmarks 9192 +0.013s ... 0.076s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.217s ... 0.292s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.319s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)