Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Core i9-12900

Intel Core i7-12700F

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700F

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-12900

► remove from comparison  i9-12900

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.1 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.8 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 202 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700FIntel Core i9-12900KIntel Core i9-12900
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S Alder Lake-S
CodenameAlder LakeAlder LakeAlder Lake
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 « 2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz3200 - 5200 MHz2400 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1.4 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache12 MB14 MB14 MB
L3 Cache25 MB30 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2016 / 2416 / 24
TDP65 Watt125 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA1700LGA 1700
Architecturex86x86x86
$386 U.S.$589 U.S.$489 U.S.
Announced
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
44.5 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
50.7 pt (70%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900
43.8 pt (61%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
18628 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (81%)
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (85%)     max: 2011 Points
1825 Points (78%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (81%)
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (86%)     max: 777 Points
703 Points (78%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
7179 Points (18%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
3299 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (82%)
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (87%)     max: 292 Points
262 Points (79%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
39 Points (51%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (87%)     max: 3.5 Points
3.2 Points (79%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
8949 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
68729 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (65%)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (78%)     max: 112893 Points
107565 Points (75%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
14610 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
211.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8695 Points (14%)
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
10739 Points (17%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
50152 MIPS (29%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (73%)
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (79%)     max: 6580 MIPS
5979 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (41%)
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (70%)     max: 206 fps
147.5 fps (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (68%)
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (85%)     max: 368.5 fps
310 fps (72%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
14.4 fps (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2 GB/s
1.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
3.4 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
17.2 GB/s (45%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
262.7 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
17464 Points (37%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (58%)
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (86%)     max: 97955 Points
78877 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (64%)
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (71%)     max: 28789 Points
24314 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
74061 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
73871 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (67%)
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (84%)     max: 118702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
19775 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
35153 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
15095 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (67%)
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (85%)     max: 2042 Points
1656 Points (70%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
8924 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
1638 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
8845 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
6991 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (44%)
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (71%)     max: 64238 Points
36310 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
602 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (85%)
96769 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (68%)     max: 330 Points
269 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (71%)
2308 Points (88%)
1785 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
151 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
206 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
56.1 Watt (37%)
59.7 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt
16 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 141% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900 → 115% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 14:06:03

#0 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14150 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.016s ... 0.041s

#8 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.01s ... 0.051s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.017s ... 0.068s

#10 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.022s ... 0.09s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14150 +0.014s ... 0.104s

#12 got single benchmarks 14150 +0.01s ... 0.114s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.456s ... 0.57s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.571s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)