Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700F

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700F

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700FIntel Core i9-12900K
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz3200 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache12 MB14 MB
L3 Cache25 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2016 / 24
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA1700
Architecturex86x86
$386 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
44.5 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
50.7 pt (70%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (81%)
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (85%)     max: 2011 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (81%)
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (86%)     max: 777 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (82%)
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (87%)     max: 292 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (87%)     max: 3.5 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (65%)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (78%)     max: 112893 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8695 Points (14%)
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (73%)
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (79%)     max: 6580 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (41%)
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (70%)     max: 206 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (68%)
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (85%)     max: 368.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (58%)
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (86%)     max: 97955 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (64%)
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (71%)     max: 28789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (67%)
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (84%)     max: 118702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (67%)
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (85%)     max: 2042 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (44%)
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (71%)     max: 64238 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (85%)
96769 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (68%)     max: 330 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (71%)
2308 Points (88%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
56.1 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 137% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 21:37:47

#0 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.017s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.01s ... 0.049s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.017s ... 0.066s

#9 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.02s ... 0.086s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.385s ... 0.471s

#12 return log +0.028s ... 0.499s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)