Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i9-11900H vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i7-12700F

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700F

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0, 2.1 base), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz (1.6 GHz base). All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The F-series desktop models don't offer an integrated graphics card.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 180 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i9-11900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900H

The Intel Core i9-11900H is a high end octa core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and was announced in mid 2021. It integrates eight Willow Cove processor cores (16 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.5 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.9 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.5 GHz. The CPU offers 24 MB level 3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory. 

Thanks to the new Tiger Lake architecture, the i9-11900H should be similar or faster than the old Intel Core i9-10885H (Comet Lake-H, 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, 16 MB L3) in single and multi threaded performance and similar to the Ryzen 9 5800H (Zen 3, 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 16 MB L3). Therefore, the i9 should be one of the fastest laptop CPUs in 2021 and well suited for even very demanding tasks.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card called UHD graphics with all 32 EUs.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series). The default TDP is rated at 45 W at 2.5 GHz base speed, at 35 Watt the base clock speed decreases to 2.1 GHz (cTDP down).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700FIntel Core i9-11900HIntel Core i7-12700
CodenameAlder LakeTiger Lake-HAlder Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Tiger LakeIntel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900KB3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H « 2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz2500 - 4900 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB640 KB1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB10 MB12 MB
L3 Cache25 MB24 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 208 / 1612 / 20
TDP65 Watt45 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1787LGA 1700
Architecturex86x86x86
$386 U.S.$349 U.S.
Announced
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700F
39.8 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900H
36.3 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15291 Points (14%)
min: 11135     avg: 12109     median: 12143.5 (11%)     max: 13012 Points
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1898 Points (80%)
min: 1574     avg: 1585     median: 1580.5 (66%)     max: 1605 Points
1894 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
726 Points (79%)
min: 600     avg: 607     median: 608 (66%)     max: 615 Points
731 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5786 Points (14%)
min: 4324     avg: 4758     median: 4878 (12%)     max: 5160 Points
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2610 Points (16%)
min: 1770     avg: 2068     median: 2148 (14%)     max: 2211 Points
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (75%)
min: 236     avg: 239.8     median: 241 (67%)     max: 243 Points
272 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (43%)
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9146 Points (55%)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
56067 Points (41%)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
93400 Points (60%)
103354 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15176 Points (18%)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
128.3 s (2%)
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8695 Points (14%)
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
61218 MIPS (35%)
min: 49486     avg: 52910     median: 53205 (31%)     max: 57263 MIPS
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6145 MIPS (72%)
min: 5582     avg: 5781     median: 5795 (68%)     max: 6018 MIPS
6292 MIPS (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.6 fps (3%)
172.4 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.5 fps (8%)
347 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.7 fps (31%)
min: 13.6     avg: 15     median: 15 (26%)     max: 16.7 fps
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.3 GB/s (9%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
479 Seconds (6%)
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
212 Seconds (1%)
min: 231     avg: 247     median: 243 (2%)     max: 270 Seconds
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.544 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15823 Points (34%)
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
386.3 s (2%)
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66554 Points (51%)
72464 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23748 Points (58%)
min: 14467     avg: 17623     median: 18686 (46%)     max: 19231 Points
27022 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81273 Points (66%)
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77233 Points (63%)
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79448 Points (64%)
96264 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17840 Points (45%)
min: 13550     avg: 15637     median: 16364 (41%)     max: 17649 Points
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
31106 Points (55%)
min: 21513     avg: 24434     median: 24867 (44%)     max: 26502 Points
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11521 Points (49%)
min: 9050     avg: 9865     median: 9631.5 (41%)     max: 11145 Points
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2532 Points (61%)
2355 Points (57%)
2602 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
10864 Points (42%)
9401 Points (36%)
13519 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1590 Points (60%)
min: 1576     avg: 1634     median: 1632 (62%)     max: 1692 Points
1924 Points (73%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10126 Points (18%)
min: 7725     avg: 9140     median: 9628 (17%)     max: 9856 Points
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1557 Points (7%)
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10249 Points (32%)
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6698 Points (67%)
8059 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39852 Points (39%)
52676 Points (52%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
522 ms (1%)
min: 603     avg: 606     median: 606 (1%)     max: 608 ms
508 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94804 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
271 Points (74%)
227 Points (62%)
268 Points (74%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (50%)
min: 272     avg: 275.2     median: 273 (49%)     max: 286 Points
314 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1841 Points (69%)
1632 Points (61%)
2016 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.6 Watt (20%)
min: 88.9     avg: 110.4     median: 116 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
127.6 Watt (23%)
min: 89.3     avg: 137.7     median: 152 (28%)     max: 159 Watt
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.7 Watt (20%)
17.3 Watt (11%)
82.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 13.3     avg: 14.4     median: 14.1 (10%)     max: 16 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700F → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900H → 87% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 119% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 02. 09:59:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14604 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13143 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759391947s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14604 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14604 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13143 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 13143 +0.011s ... 0.034s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#13 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.005s ... 0.043s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.11s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.11s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)