Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700 vs Intel Core i5-1235U

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700Intel Core i5-1235U
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake-U
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-M
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz900 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB928 KB
L2 Cache12 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache25 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 2010 / 12
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1744
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$349 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
33.4 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
93 Points (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
406 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21751 Points (20%)
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1894 Points (80%)
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (67%)     max: 1698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points (80%)
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (67%)     max: 651 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8338 Points (20%)
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3151 Points (20%)
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (75%)
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (60%)     max: 242.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
103354 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
78331 MIPS (45%)
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6292 MIPS (74%)
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
172.4 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.5 fps (45%)
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
151 Seconds (1%)
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
72464 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (67%)
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (25%)     max: 15604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86815 Points (71%)
67708 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23193 Points (59%)
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
34681 Points (62%)
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16400 Points (69%)
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2602 Points (65%)
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (52%)     max: 2208 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13519 Points (52%)
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1897     median: 1897 (60%)     max: 2106 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5677     avg: 6161     median: 6160.5 (25%)     max: 6644 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1924 Points (73%)
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (60%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14961 Points (27%)
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1845 Points (8%)
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14883 Points (47%)
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8059 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52676 Points (52%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
508 ms (1%)
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (58%)     max: 83104 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (74%)
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (62%)     max: 236 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (56%)
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (45%)     max: 305 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (4%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (42%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2016 Points (75%)
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (53%)     max: 1644 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
327 Watt (56%)
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
284 Watt (52%)
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)
1318%
1 i5-1235U +
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 7.17 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 59% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 22:20:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759263657s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 14995 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.011s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.052s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)