Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700 vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS vs Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 6900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R9 6900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.9 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The HS variant offers a 10 W lower TDP and therefore a lower sustained performance than the HX version.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6900HS in our database matches the Intel Core i7-12800H in multi-thread performance while managing to keep up with the more power-hungry 6900HX. "Top of the crop" is precisely the right phrase to describe this Ryzen 9 series chip, as of Q4 2022, and it will have no difficulty ripping through any task imaginable for years to come.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.4 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watts and therefore better suited for thin and light laptops. The power efficiency should be very good, thanks to the improved 6 nm process  and additional power saving features in the 6000 series.

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700AMD Ryzen 9 6900HSIntel Core i9-12900K
CodenameAlder LakeRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Alder Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-129002.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4900 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz3200 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache1 MB512 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache12 MB4 MB14 MB
L3 Cache25 MB16 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 208 / 1616 / 24
TDP65 Watt35 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm6 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700FP7/FP7r2LGA1700
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$349 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.amd.comark.intel.com
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 6900HS
36.6 pt (61%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
43.7 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21751 Points (20%)
min: 12606     avg: 13439     median: 13445 (12%)     max: 14403 Points
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1894 Points (80%)
min: 1526     avg: 1553     median: 1554 (65%)     max: 1570 Points
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (84%)     max: 2011 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points (80%)
min: 596     avg: 608     median: 612 (67%)     max: 620 Points
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (84%)     max: 777 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8338 Points (20%)
min: 4829     avg: 5167     median: 5152 (13%)     max: 5552 Points
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3151 Points (20%)
min: 2054     avg: 2191     median: 2161 (14%)     max: 2342 Points
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (75%)
min: 218     avg: 242     median: 245 (68%)     max: 254 Points
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (80%)     max: 292 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.9 Points (48%)
min: 24.2     avg: 24.8     median: 24.7 (32%)     max: 25.29 Points
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
min: 2.92     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 2.97 Points
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (83%)     max: 3.5 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9171 Points (55%)
min: 6403     avg: 6405     median: 6404.5 (39%)     max: 6406 Points
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60892 Points (44%)
min: 38071     avg: 39960     median: 39960 (29%)     max: 41849 Points
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
103354 Points (66%)
73218 Points (47%)
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (72%)     max: 112893 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15091 Points (18%)
12340 Points (15%)
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
272.8 s (3%)
116.8 s (1%)
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
5.5 s (1%)
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9328 Points (15%)
min: 5835     avg: 6488     median: 6488 (10%)     max: 7141 Points
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
78331 MIPS (45%)
min: 52948     avg: 60092     median: 62006 (36%)     max: 63591 MIPS
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6292 MIPS (74%)
min: 5538     avg: 5766     median: 5805 (68%)     max: 5958 MIPS
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (78%)     max: 6580 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
172.4 fps (4%)
min: 122.5     avg: 123.6     median: 123.6 (3%)     max: 124.7 fps
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (5%)     max: 206 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (9%)
min: 259     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (7%)     max: 272 fps
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (9%)     max: 368.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.5 fps (45%)
min: 14.2     avg: 16.2     median: 16.2 (28%)     max: 17.9 fps
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
min: 0.962     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (57%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
min: 1.4     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (28%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
min: 10.3     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (29%)     max: 11.9 GB/s
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
min: 378     avg: 409.7     median: 382 (5%)     max: 469 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
151 Seconds (1%)
min: 220     avg: 239     median: 227 (2%)     max: 277 Seconds
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.4672     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.502 sec
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15390 Points (33%)
min: 13658     avg: 14206     median: 14208 (30%)     max: 14752 Points
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
min: 7.4     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 10.58 s
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
min: 18.1     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 25.703 s
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.4 s (2%)
min: 643     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 873.522 s
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
72464 Points (56%)
min: 68571     avg: 71157     median: 71601 (55%)     max: 73298 Points
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (75%)     max: 97955 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (67%)
min: 14568     avg: 18023     median: 18587 (46%)     max: 20560 Points
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (65%)     max: 28789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86815 Points (71%)
min: 69103     avg: 75800     median: 75280 (61%)     max: 83016 Points
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86587 Points (70%)
75258 Points (61%)
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (77%)
min: 81152     avg: 81465     median: 81465 (65%)     max: 81778 Points
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (80%)     max: 118702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23193 Points (59%)
min: 11880     avg: 17085     median: 17986 (45%)     max: 19624 Points
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
34681 Points (62%)
min: 21071     avg: 24638     median: 25048 (45%)     max: 26334 Points
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16400 Points (69%)
min: 8979     avg: 9711     median: 10072 (42%)     max: 10221 Points
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2602 Points (65%)
2175 Points (54%)
2715 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13519 Points (52%)
10317 Points (40%)
17450 Points (68%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1924 Points (73%)
min: 1480     avg: 1541     median: 1537 (58%)     max: 1614 Points
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (76%)     max: 2042 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14961 Points (27%)
min: 8381     avg: 9358     median: 9224 (17%)     max: 10040 Points
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1845 Points (8%)
min: 1428     avg: 1490     median: 1502 (7%)     max: 1541 Points
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14883 Points (47%)
min: 9226     avg: 9501     median: 9261 (29%)     max: 10015 Points
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8059 Points (80%)
min: 5986     avg: 6400     median: 6476 (65%)     max: 6739 Points
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52676 Points (52%)
min: 35811     avg: 38242     median: 39091 (38%)     max: 39825 Points
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (63%)     max: 64238 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
508 ms (1%)
min: 566     avg: 599     median: 591 (1%)     max: 644 ms
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 94     avg: 106.6     median: 106.6 (1%)     max: 119.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
73797 Points (54%)
96769 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (74%)
min: 184.4     avg: 202.3     median: 197.4 (54%)     max: 225 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (56%)
min: 239     avg: 273.6     median: 281 (50%)     max: 304 Points
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 330 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2016 Points (75%)
min: 1415     avg: 1534     median: 1527 (57%)     max: 1661 Points
2308 Points (86%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
327 Watt (56%)
min: 78.2     avg: 101.9     median: 104.3 (18%)     max: 118.9 Watt
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
284 Watt (52%)
min: 84.8     avg: 107     median: 105.5 (19%)     max: 129 Watt
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)
min: 7.74     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (11%)     max: 24.9 Watt
56.1 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.53     avg: 15.6     median: 18.1 (22%)     max: 20.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 18.2     avg: 21.6     median: 22.3 (17%)     max: 24.4 Points per Watt
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS → 79% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 114% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 20:46:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14118 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759085166s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14118 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 14118 +0.011s ... 0.034s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#13 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.009s ... 0.048s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.131s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.131s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)