Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs Intel Pentium Silver N5000

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5000

The Intel Pentium Silver N5000 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst max. 2.6 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5000 in our database is in the same league as the AMD 3050e and the Pentium 4415U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a really poor result, as of Q3 2023.

The Yoga 330-11IGM is among the fastest laptops featuring the N5000 that we know of. It can be more than 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system built around the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4.8 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FIntel Pentium Silver N5000
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RGemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 « 1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz1100 - 2700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB224 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache9 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 64 / 4
TDP65 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm, 10014 nm
Die Size149 mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2BGA1090
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
Architecturex86x86
$182 U.S.$161 U.S.
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
30.9 pt (43%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5000
17.7 pt (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1232 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
438 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (46%)
min: 167     avg: 170     median: 170 (19%)     max: 173 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
min: 424     avg: 469.3     median: 484 (1%)     max: 500 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
2.8 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
0.9 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
645 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
16.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
1245 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
7320 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (56%)
2431 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (22%)
15.4 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
76.3 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
1.3 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
2707 Seconds (19%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3247     avg: 3320     median: 3320 (7%)     max: 3393 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
24.2 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
56.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
1319 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5882 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
min: 24195     avg: 25128     median: 24695 (20%)     max: 26493 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 24199     avg: 24660     median: 24279 (20%)     max: 25501 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
min: 2141     avg: 2355     median: 2307 (6%)     max: 2873 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
min: 3193     avg: 3563     median: 3448 (6%)     max: 4263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (48%)
421 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
1582 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2009     avg: 2046     median: 2045 (28%)     max: 2084 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5211     avg: 5460     median: 5488 (13%)     max: 5654 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5045     avg: 5523     median: 5547.5 (10%)     max: 5868 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1707     avg: 1781     median: 1777.5 (35%)     max: 1876 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5789 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1850 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3759 Points (30%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2847 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4823 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6247 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4819 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
min: 2251     avg: 2714     median: 2797 (3%)     max: 2871 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
194.6 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13075     avg: 13480     median: 13121 (12%)     max: 14601 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (44%)
min: 88.2     avg: 89.1     median: 89.1 (19%)     max: 90 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5000 → 46% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 00:25:37

#0 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9420 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.017s ... 0.052s

#7 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.009s ... 0.061s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9420 +0.016s ... 0.077s

#9 got single benchmarks 9420 +0.038s ... 0.115s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.31s ... 0.425s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.448s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)