Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8259U vs Intel Core i5-1145G7

Intel Core i5-8259U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8259U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7267U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.3 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.8 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i5 and i7 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8259U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz (slowest clock of the 655, the fastest is 1200 MHz in combination with the i7-8559U) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

ModelIntel Core i5-8259UIntel Core i5-1145G7
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-UTiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i7-8559U compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U « 2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2300 - 3800 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1 MB5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1528BGA1449
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8259U
27.6 pt (38%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
32.8 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3592     avg: 3792     median: 3728 (3%)     max: 4025 Points
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 959     avg: 976     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 991 Points
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 369     avg: 378     median: 381 (42%)     max: 386 Points
531 Points (59%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1385     avg: 1473     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1567 Points
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 575     avg: 622     median: 615 (4%)     max: 687 Points
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 132     avg: 147.1     median: 148.7 (45%)     max: 154 Points
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (61%)     max: 203 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.1 Points (9%)
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5706 Points (34%)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
21869 Points (16%)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
27377 Points (19%)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (24%)     max: 35372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7397 Points (9%)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
248.6 s (3%)
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.5 s (2%)
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5348 Points (8%)
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 17799     avg: 20778     median: 19104.5 (11%)     max: 28824 MIPS
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3753     avg: 3949     median: 3975.5 (48%)     max: 4022 MIPS
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 38.5     avg: 39.5     median: 39.5 (14%)     max: 40.5 fps
46.3 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 162.3     avg: 165.1     median: 165.1 (38%)     max: 167.95 fps
192 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.72     avg: 5.2     median: 5.4 (9%)     max: 5.49 fps
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (13%)
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.1 GB/s (11%)
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1331 Seconds (17%)
1116 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 688     avg: 730     median: 729.5 (5%)     max: 769 Seconds
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.738     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.818 sec
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7916 Points (17%)
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.1 s (2%)
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.3 s (1%)
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
589 s (3%)
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25093 Points (22%)
30874 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7105     avg: 8348     median: 8528.5 (23%)     max: 9276 Points
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (30%)     max: 11536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 47878     avg: 49579     median: 49578.5 (40%)     max: 51279 Points
63423 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 47855     avg: 49509     median: 49509 (40%)     max: 51163 Points
63591 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17718     avg: 40451     median: 49722 (42%)     max: 53914 Points
65828 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5946     avg: 6904     median: 6670.5 (17%)     max: 7927 Points
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8348     avg: 9726     median: 9743 (17%)     max: 11006 Points
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2752     avg: 3096     median: 3132 (13%)     max: 3346 Points
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 961     median: 951 (40%)     max: 984 Points
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3359     avg: 3602     median: 3607 (6%)     max: 3839 Points
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 944     avg: 957     median: 948 (4%)     max: 979 Points
1423 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3335     avg: 3571     median: 3567 (11%)     max: 3811 Points
5351 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4200     avg: 4265     median: 4211 (42%)     max: 4383 Points
6226 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13421     avg: 14122     median: 13961 (16%)     max: 14984 Points
20787 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1010     avg: 1054     median: 1068 (1%)     max: 1095 ms
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
140.3 Points (40%)
177.4 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173.3     avg: 176.9     median: 176 (37%)     max: 182.4 Points
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (50%)     max: 243 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
954 Points (37%)
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (49%)     max: 1290 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.1     avg: 42     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 50.3 Watt
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.6     avg: 44.2     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 51.3 Watt
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
13.9 Watt (9%)
10.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.4     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 15.3 Points per Watt
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8259U → 100% n=48

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 124% n=48

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 14:19:51

#0 checking url part for id 10068 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10068 +0.021s ... 0.043s

#7 got single benchmarks 10068 +0.02s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.018s ... 0.081s

#9 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.02s ... 0.102s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.339s ... 0.44s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.464s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)