Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-1115G4 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3780U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

Intel Core i3-1115G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1115G4

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is a dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation (UP3) that was launched in September 2020. It integrates two Willow Cove processor cores (4 threads thanks to HyperThreading). Each core can clock from 3 GHz (base speed) to 4.1 GHz (single- and dual-core boost). The faster Core i5 and i7 models offer more cores and are therefore significantly faster.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. In the i3-1115G4 Intel is naming the GPU UHD Graphics and offers only 48 of the 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1250 MHz. GPU and CPU can together use the 6 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and WiFi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process that should be comparable to the 7 nm TSMC process (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Performance

Multi-thread peformance is most comparable to what the Intel Core i5-8250U and the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U deliver. This makes the i3 a more than decent option for day-to-day tasks; that said, any workload of the more taxing kind (such as exporting a high-bitrate, hour long UHD video) will be enough to bring the i3 to its knees.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the ThinkPad L15 G2-20X4S0KU00 is one of the fastest laptops powered by the 1115G4 we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs.

The Core i3-1115G4 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3780U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3780U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3780U,a Microsoft Surface edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in Oct 2019 as part of the new Surface Laptop 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3780U offers the faster Vega 11 instead of the Vega 10 GPU.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 3780U as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 3700U, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-1115G4AMD Ryzen 7 3780UAMD Ryzen 5 3580U
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Picasso-U (Zen+)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
Intel Core i7-1195G72.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G73 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G72.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G72.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G72.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G72.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G42 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 « 3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4100 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449FP5FP5
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
30.5 pt (42%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
26.2 pt (36%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2725     avg: 3038     median: 3125 (3%)     max: 3244 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1242     avg: 1299     median: 1312 (56%)     max: 1319 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 504     avg: 507     median: 504.5 (56%)     max: 515 Points
290 Points (32%)
352 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 961     avg: 1120     median: 1114 (3%)     max: 1251 Points
1580 Points (4%)
1549 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 384.7     avg: 461.6     median: 480.5 (3%)     max: 507 Points
788 Points (5%)
693 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 137     avg: 179.9     median: 190 (57%)     max: 197 Points
166 Points (50%)
139 Points (42%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.8 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8018 Points (48%)
4525 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16265 Points (12%)
18307 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
412.8 s (5%)
274.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
7.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2924 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 11122     avg: 12669     median: 12919.5 (7%)     max: 13422 MIPS
15209 MIPS (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4497     avg: 4586     median: 4599.5 (55%)     max: 4674 MIPS
3572 MIPS (43%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
26.2 fps (9%)
40.1 fps (14%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
141.6 fps (33%)
135.3 fps (31%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.25     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (7%)     max: 4.1 fps
4.1 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.8 GB/s (7%)
3.5 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 940     avg: 1037     median: 1021.5 (7%)     max: 1188 Seconds
710 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.636     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.671 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6331 Points (13%)
5545 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
12 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
27.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
434.8 s (2%)
694 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
16869 Points (15%)
21501 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5128     avg: 5771     median: 5579.5 (15%)     max: 6640 Points
6856 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57115     avg: 59888     median: 60028 (49%)     max: 62520 Points
47473 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 48647     avg: 55626     median: 56348 (46%)     max: 61883 Points
48287 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 65022     avg: 65592     median: 65591.5 (55%)     max: 66161 Points
52082 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3986     avg: 4871     median: 5038 (13%)     max: 5250 Points
6687 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6125     avg: 7184     median: 7331.5 (13%)     max: 7786 Points
9805 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2227     avg: 2623     median: 2635 (11%)     max: 2937 Points
2898 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1190     avg: 1296     median: 1311.5 (55%)     max: 1352 Points
940 Points (40%)
900 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2341     avg: 2628     median: 2605 (5%)     max: 2983 Points
3050 Points (5%)
2990 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1328 Points (6%)
890 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2399 Points (8%)
3380 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5601 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9945 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 657.9     avg: 749     median: 755 (1%)     max: 805 ms
1243 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 49170     avg: 55606     median: 58151 (52%)     max: 59497 Points
28517 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (44%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 200     avg: 213.7     median: 204.5 (43%)     max: 257 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 950     avg: 1029     median: 1033 (40%)     max: 1094 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.7     avg: 36.1     median: 35.2 (6%)     max: 44.6 Watt
41.1 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.6     avg: 36.3     median: 39.1 (7%)     max: 41.3 Watt
40 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.66     avg: 6.2     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.67 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.1     avg: 13.5     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 16.3 Points per Watt
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3780U → 107% n=6

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 102% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 05:54:43

#0 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11512 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.021s ... 0.064s

#8 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.079s ... 0.143s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11512 +0.004s ... 0.147s

#10 got single benchmarks 11512 +0.007s ... 0.153s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.018s ... 0.172s

#12 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.007s ... 0.179s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.179s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.441s ... 0.619s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.619s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)