Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 vs Intel Core i5-1240P vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-84-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. As the second-fastest X Elite chip in September 2024, the X1E-84-100 has 12 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 4.2 GHz, along with the 4.6 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller delivering over 100 GB/s of throughput. USB 4.0, TB 4 and PCIe 4 are all onboard, too.

Two slower Snapdragon X Elite flavors exist, known as the X1E-80-100 and X1E-78-100. In the meantime, the X1E-00-1DE is a special version of the X1E-84-100 aimed at system makers and software developers that has just slightly higher single-core and dual-core Boost clock speeds of 4.3 GHz but otherwise the same CPU/GPU/NPU configuration.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (3 clusters of essentially identical cores; 12 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

Like most X Elite and X Plus processors, the X1E-84-100 is based on the larger die codenamed Hamoa. The processor is believed to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 4.2 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

If the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 review is any indication, the Snapdragon is almost as fast as the Core Ultra 7 155H in applications compiled for ARM while being up to 30% slower when executing x86 code.

A lot depends on how high the power limits of the system are, and how competent its cooling solution is.

Graphics

The 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPU has 1,536 unified shaders running at up to 1,500 MHz. It is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) based on the significantly older Adreno 730 iGPU, rendering the X1-85 DX12-compatible but not DX12 Ultimate-compatible. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Its gaming performance is in many use cases almost as good as the Intel Arc 8 for reasonably playable experience in many 2023 and 2024 games such as Baldur's Gate 3 at 1080p on low graphics settings.

Power consumption

An X1E-84-100 can eat up to 80 watts depending on the system and the power profile chosen. This will differ from one laptop to another, with most designs expected to target the ~45 W sweet spot. The Samsung laptop that we finished testing in early September certainly does.

It must be said that the power consumption figures include RAM, unlike it is with most Intel and AMD chips.

The Qualcomm SoC is built with the TSMC N4P process for better-than-average, as of H2 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1240P

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1240P

The Intel Core i5-1240P is a mid-range Alder Lake-P family SoC designed for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. It was announced in early 2022 and it has 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line i7-1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The i5's P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with its E-cores. The clock speeds range from 1.7 GHz to 4.4 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.2 GHz to 3.3 GHz for the efficient cluster. The shortcomings of this processor as compared with the slightly faster Core i5-1250P include the slightly lower iGPU clock speed and the limited vPro feature set ("Essentials" tier only, not allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i5 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of Core i5-1240P's CPU cores enjoy access to 12 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200; Intel recommends using no more than 64 GB of RAM, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, this Core i5 comes with the Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (FCBGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 5 5500U, Ryzen 5 5600U and, surprisingly enough, the Core i5-1250P, making the i5-1240P a great processor for most consumers. Content creators and gamers will be better served by an H-class CPU such as the mighty Core i7-12700H, though.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 40 W, the NUC 12 Pro Kit NUC12WSBi5 is among the fastest systems built around the 1240P that we know of. It can be more than 2 times as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 80 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.3 GHz has seen little change from what was built into certain Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like an i5-1135G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. You can use up to 4 monitors simultaneously with this GPU, provided the laptop has the outputs required. The Xe isn't a stranger to a bit of casual gaming; that said, your mileage may vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how capable the cooling solution of a laptop is. Expect something close to NVIDIA's MX250 or in other words, acceptable framerates in most games when playing at 1080p / Low settings. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as the Iris Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory.

Power consumption

The i5's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP value or Power Limit 1) is 28 W; its maximum Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2) is not supposed to exceed 64 W. The "Minimum Assured" power consumption is fairly high at 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

This 12th generation Intel chip is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. Keep in mind that many 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are just as fast, or even faster than the i5 while sipping less juice.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-42-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 3.4 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-42-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, the average X1P-42-100 competes with older chips such as the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code. With apps compiled specifically with Windows on ARM in mind, a Core i7-1360P-like performance level is to be expected which is not bad at all for what is supposed to be a budget CPU.

The 3.4 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When under multi-threaded load, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.2 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Intel Core i5-1240PQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
CodenameOryonAlder Lake-POryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Alder Lake-PQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 « 3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Intel Core i7-1280P1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P « 1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock3800 - 4200 MHz1200 - 4400 MHz <=3400 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB1.1 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB10 MB12 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 12
12 x 4.2 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 168 / 8
8 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1300 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ArchitectureARMx86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP28 Watt30 Watt
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-84-100
34.6 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1240P
33.6 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-42-100
30.2 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 124     avg: 128.3     median: 128 (72%)     max: 133 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 866     avg: 1007     median: 970 (18%)     max: 1220 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9471 Points (9%)
min: 277     avg: 8274     median: 9392 (9%)     max: 11556 Points
min: 6062     avg: 7312     median: 7422 (7%)     max: 8284 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1350 Points (57%)
min: 640     avg: 1475     median: 1600 (67%)     max: 1689 Points
min: 1065     avg: 1110     median: 1109 (47%)     max: 1134 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
511 Points (56%)
min: 251     avg: 568     median: 608 (66%)     max: 653 Points
min: 406     avg: 419.3     median: 421 (46%)     max: 425 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3561 Points (9%)
min: 1152     avg: 3231     median: 3175 (8%)     max: 4456 Points
min: 2361     avg: 2787     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1946 Points (12%)
min: 884     avg: 1547     median: 1566.5 (10%)     max: 2007 Points
min: 1191     avg: 1427     median: 1419 (9%)     max: 1556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (70%)
min: 91.8     avg: 211.4     median: 226 (63%)     max: 243 Points
min: 206     avg: 210.1     median: 211 (58%)     max: 215 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.6 Points (25%)
22.1 Points (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (62%)
2.9 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3234 Points (20%)
8205 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17722 Points (13%)
42275 Points (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
227.3 s (3%)
329.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.4 s (1%)
10.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13707 Points (22%)
17276 Points (27%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
41410 MIPS (24%)
min: 23132     avg: 35505     median: 34118 (20%)     max: 47002 MIPS
min: 29238     avg: 31053     median: 30828 (18%)     max: 32811 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5521 MIPS (65%)
min: 2197     avg: 4674     median: 4791 (56%)     max: 5320 MIPS
min: 4087     avg: 4504     median: 4561 (54%)     max: 4675 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.8 fps (12%)
min: 6.71     avg: 9.7     median: 9.4 (17%)     max: 12.9 fps
min: 3.16     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (9%)     max: 6.02 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
6.6 GB/s (17%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
619 Seconds (8%)
min: 552     avg: 781     median: 812 (10%)     max: 1103 Seconds
min: 711     avg: 898     median: 856 (11%)     max: 1226 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
353 Seconds (2%)
min: 285     avg: 408     median: 399 (3%)     max: 571 Seconds
min: 399     avg: 496.3     median: 466 (3%)     max: 683 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.4987     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 1.236 sec
min: 0.728     avg: 0.8     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.777 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.5 s (3%)
8.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
736 s (3%)
438.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
27727 Points (21%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13195 Points (32%)
min: 5907     avg: 12961     median: 13300 (33%)     max: 19096 Points
min: 11743     avg: 12416     median: 12523 (31%)     max: 12625 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58952     avg: 67520     median: 69591 (57%)     max: 74295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73031 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 72972     avg: 75110     median: 75109.5 (62%)     max: 77247 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5311     avg: 11105     median: 9957 (25%)     max: 16134 Points
min: 8737     avg: 8919     median: 8996 (23%)     max: 9024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
15454 Points (28%)
min: 9971     avg: 16234     median: 15095 (27%)     max: 22964 Points
min: 13147     avg: 13554     median: 13563 (24%)     max: 13780 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4847 Points (20%)
min: 3192     avg: 6145     median: 5666.5 (24%)     max: 9118 Points
min: 3282     avg: 4225     median: 3306 (14%)     max: 5699 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2777     avg: 2882     median: 2892 (72%)     max: 2966 Points
2209 Points (55%)
min: 2287     avg: 2384     median: 2393.5 (60%)     max: 2442 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 14056     avg: 15136     median: 15412 (60%)     max: 15665 Points
10364 Points (40%)
min: 10833     avg: 11258     median: 11384 (44%)     max: 11508 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 672     avg: 1527     median: 1589 (62%)     max: 1658 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (60%)     max: 1576 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4286     avg: 8011     median: 8297.5 (15%)     max: 10112 Points
min: 4457     avg: 5351     median: 5350.5 (10%)     max: 6244 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1499     avg: 1543     median: 1543 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7152     avg: 8276     median: 8275.5 (26%)     max: 9399 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6876     avg: 7041     median: 7106 (71%)     max: 7140 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 33578     avg: 34481     median: 34828 (35%)     max: 35037 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
381.2 ms (0%)
min: 575     avg: 662     median: 587 (1%)     max: 1422 ms
min: 407.5     avg: 640     median: 472.1 (1%)     max: 1145 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 105.6     avg: 106     median: 106 (1%)     max: 106.4 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94348 Points (71%)
min: 70915     avg: 77389     median: 78328 (59%)     max: 80743 Points
min: 78058     avg: 81387     median: 79536 (60%)     max: 88419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
334 Points (92%)
min: 217     avg: 226.1     median: 228 (63%)     max: 231 Points
min: 130.3     avg: 251.9     median: 270 (74%)     max: 284 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
476 Points (85%)
min: 119.2     avg: 240.3     median: 261.5 (47%)     max: 268 Points
min: 129.9     avg: 356.4     median: 401 (72%)     max: 426 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1416 Points (53%)
min: 1392     avg: 1484     median: 1502 (56%)     max: 1553 Points
min: 1061     avg: 1186     median: 1161 (43%)     max: 1463 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.7     avg: 44.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 64.2 Watt
min: 32.2     avg: 43.1     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 58.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
50.2 Watt (9%)
min: 28.6     avg: 54.6     median: 55.3 (10%)     max: 99.6 Watt
min: 37.5     avg: 50.7     median: 51.8 (9%)     max: 60.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.9 Watt (3%)
min: 4.13     avg: 6.1     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 10.1 Watt
min: 2.95     avg: 4.9     median: 4.2 (3%)     max: 9.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.7 Watt (5%)
min: 5.34     avg: 6.6     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 9.2 Watt
min: 2.56     avg: 4.5     median: 4.9 (5%)     max: 6.14 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
38.8 Points per Watt (29%)
min: 18.7     avg: 28.4     median: 27.8 (21%)     max: 44.3 Points per Watt
min: 25.9     avg: 28     median: 27.3 (20%)     max: 31.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1240P → 92% n=22

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 → 80% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 16. 19:51:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15108 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14068 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752688298s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.013s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15108 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 15108 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14068 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#11 got single benchmarks 14068 +0.005s ... 0.03s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 17591 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.085s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)