Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H vs Intel Core i7-1270P vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800H in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-12500H and the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Ryzen 9 5900HX is found close nearby as well.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 90 W, the Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H is among the fastest systems built around the 6800H that we know of. It can be about 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. An active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The R7 6800H is built with TSMC's 6 nm manufacturing process for above average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1270P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1270P

The Intel Core i7-1270P is a higher-end Alder Lake-P family CPU, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2022 and it has 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line 1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.2 GHz to 4.8 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz for the efficient cluster. Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management). Its shortcomings as compared with the mighty i7-1280P include the smaller L3 cache, lower core count, lower clock speeds; the performance is slated to be significantly lower as a result.

A brief look at the specifications instantly reveals this i7 series chip to be very similar to the Core i5-12600H, a more power-hungry processor targeted at gaming laptops.

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Intel Core i7-1270P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200. Intel suggests using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1270P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The 12 CPU cores are not just able to outshine any outgoing quad-core Tiger Lake part, the i7-1195G7 included. The average 1270P in our database directly competes with the Ryzen 7 5825U, the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U, meaning this little Core i7 is fast enough to make most consumers happy as of mid 2023.

The fairly high processing power comes at a cost. A single Golden Cove core can consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. Your mileage may thus vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.40 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like an i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU. We expect the gaming performance to be reasonably close to that of NVIDIA's MX350.

In other words, the Xe is good enough for most games at 1080p resolution / Medium settings, provided the Power Limits are high enough and the cooling solution is competent enough. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as well (the Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory).

Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). As for the "Minimum Assured" power consumption, Intel's guidelines mention 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for such a chip.

The CPU is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. It's still a rather power-hungry CPU; a single P-core will happily consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. A couple of the higher-end 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are not nearly as power-hungry while delivering similar or higher performance levels.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 6950H

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is a processor for big (workstation) laptops based on the Rembrandt generation. The R9 6900HX integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.9 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The 6950H is the professional version of the consumer R9 6900HX without overclocking features but with additional management features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor.

The new Zen 3+ architecture is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.4 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU of all at the time of announcement.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 6950H as of August 2023, we have tested one system featuring the 6950HS, its slightly more power-efficient brother. Based on that, expect the 6950H to be slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 5800H, Ryzen 9 4900H, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and also the Core i7-11800H. In other words, this is a higher-end chip that will handle almost any task with ease, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Ryzen has a default TDP of 45 W (also known as the PL1). A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this one here.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is built with TSMC's 6 nm process leading to great, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 6800HIntel Core i7-1270PAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-PRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-PAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Series: Rembrandt (Zen 3+) Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H « 3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1280P1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P « 1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4700 MHz1600 - 4800 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB10 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB18 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 168 / 16
TDP45 Watt28 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm6 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2BGA1744FP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Rem. Platf. Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon 680M ( - 2400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800H
36.4 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1270P
34.7 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 6950H
37.6 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
88 Points (49%)
93.7 Points (53%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
709 Points (13%)
743 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11481     avg: 12957     median: 13094 (12%)     max: 14660 Points
min: 8426     avg: 9718     median: 9718 (9%)     max: 11010 Points
13501 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1500     avg: 1527     median: 1542 (65%)     max: 1552 Points
min: 1552     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (68%)     max: 1688 Points
1615 Points (68%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 580     avg: 596     median: 598 (65%)     max: 605 Points
min: 595     avg: 611     median: 611 (67%)     max: 627 Points
629 Points (69%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4460     avg: 5101     median: 5083 (12%)     max: 5661 Points
min: 3167     avg: 3536     median: 3536 (9%)     max: 3905 Points
5256 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1585     avg: 2090     median: 2136 (13%)     max: 2366 Points
min: 1695     avg: 1739     median: 1739 (11%)     max: 1783 Points
2153 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 182.7     avg: 234     median: 242.5 (68%)     max: 250 Points
min: 226     avg: 229.5     median: 229.5 (64%)     max: 233 Points
260 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 23.02     avg: 24.4     median: 24.6 (32%)     max: 25.67 Points
19.9 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.83     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (68%)     max: 2.9 Points
2.7 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6382     avg: 6410     median: 6421 (39%)     max: 6428 Points
7886 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 36895     avg: 39397     median: 39319 (28%)     max: 41978 Points
36271 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 67316     avg: 69054     median: 69054 (44%)     max: 70792 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12014     avg: 12078     median: 12078 (15%)     max: 12142 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 97.298     avg: 309     median: 260.2 (3%)     max: 569.631 s
344.6 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.55     avg: 8.8     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 14.531 s
9.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 5890     avg: 11558     median: 6065 (10%)     max: 22719 Points
16497 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 55067     avg: 59319     median: 58341 (33%)     max: 64817 MIPS
min: 38099     avg: 38274     median: 38274 (22%)     max: 38449 MIPS
61152 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5521     avg: 5726     median: 5758 (68%)     max: 5803 MIPS
min: 4874     avg: 5279     median: 5279 (62%)     max: 5684 MIPS
5970 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 122.2     avg: 125.9     median: 125.9 (42%)     max: 129.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 251.5     avg: 258.9     median: 258.9 (60%)     max: 266.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.9     avg: 16.3     median: 15.9 (28%)     max: 18.5 fps
min: 9.56     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 11.3 fps
16.5 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.972     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.7     avg: 10.9     median: 11.5 (30%)     max: 13.5 GB/s
5.8 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 355     avg: 397.8     median: 392 (5%)     max: 453 Seconds
714 Seconds (9%)
392 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 213     avg: 242.1     median: 244 (2%)     max: 268 Seconds
min: 372     avg: 373.5     median: 373.5 (3%)     max: 375 Seconds
232 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4783     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.515 sec
min: 0.4926     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.575 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13527     avg: 13696     median: 13602 (29%)     max: 13958 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.839     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 9.131 s
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19.101     avg: 20.4     median: 20.4 (1%)     max: 21.76 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 694.152     avg: 712     median: 711.6 (3%)     max: 729.001 s
436.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 63580     avg: 65107     median: 65106.5 (50%)     max: 66633 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16034     avg: 17954     median: 17606.5 (43%)     max: 20194 Points
min: 10981     avg: 12323     median: 12323 (30%)     max: 13665 Points
17198 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 72800     avg: 78445     median: 80390 (65%)     max: 82145 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 72252     avg: 78330     median: 80583 (65%)     max: 82155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 79042     avg: 82896     median: 84041 (70%)     max: 85606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16924     avg: 17994     median: 17412.5 (44%)     max: 19934 Points
min: 9451     avg: 9958     median: 9958 (25%)     max: 10465 Points
16925 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23542     avg: 24922     median: 24655 (44%)     max: 27288 Points
min: 18221     avg: 18284     median: 18283.5 (33%)     max: 18346 Points
24245 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8128     avg: 9440     median: 9263 (39%)     max: 10908 Points
min: 5316     avg: 6022     median: 6021.5 (25%)     max: 6727 Points
9096 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2049     avg: 2056     median: 2056 (51%)     max: 2063 Points
2217 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9527     avg: 9585     median: 9584.5 (37%)     max: 9642 Points
10439 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1973     avg: 1982     median: 1981.5 (63%)     max: 1990 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 9194     avg: 9206     median: 9205.5 (38%)     max: 9217 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1518     avg: 1550     median: 1550.5 (61%)     max: 1568 Points
min: 1564     avg: 1644     median: 1644 (64%)     max: 1724 Points
1641 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8898     avg: 9458     median: 9331 (17%)     max: 10355 Points
min: 8610     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (16%)     max: 8710 Points
9596 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1484     avg: 1505     median: 1509 (7%)     max: 1523 Points
1683 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8868     avg: 9294     median: 9228 (29%)     max: 10189 Points
8537 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6341     avg: 6427     median: 6428 (64%)     max: 6500 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 35810     avg: 36493     median: 36446 (36%)     max: 37393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 584     avg: 590     median: 590.5 (1%)     max: 596 ms
min: 537     avg: 541     median: 540.5 (1%)     max: 544 ms
570 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
105.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 73164     avg: 74897     median: 75542 (57%)     max: 75984 Points
78273 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 197.4     avg: 222.2     median: 225 (62%)     max: 229 Points
251 Points (69%)
237 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 252     avg: 280     median: 278 (50%)     max: 304 Points
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (51%)     max: 291 Points
304 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1522     avg: 1603     median: 1590 (59%)     max: 1704 Points
min: 1585     avg: 1649     median: 1648.5 (62%)     max: 1712 Points
1448 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62.1     avg: 97     median: 85 (15%)     max: 157.2 Watt
min: 47.3     avg: 53.2     median: 53.2 (9%)     max: 59.1 Watt
87.1 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61     avg: 98.5     median: 90.7 (17%)     max: 148.9 Watt
min: 61.3     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (12%)     max: 64.9 Watt
80.7 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.28     avg: 10     median: 8.8 (6%)     max: 20.8 Watt
4 Watt (3%)
16.3 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.77     avg: 10.1     median: 10.4 (12%)     max: 14.7 Watt
4.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 15.9     avg: 23.5     median: 23.1 (17%)     max: 31.7 Points per Watt
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (21%)     max: 27.7 Points per Watt
26.7 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800H → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1270P → 84% n=22

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H → 103% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 03. 14:27:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14082 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14062 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14370 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751545643s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:20:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14082 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14082 +0.018s ... 0.034s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14062 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#11 got single benchmarks 14062 +0.005s ... 0.043s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14370 +0.004s ... 0.047s

#13 got single benchmarks 14370 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.118s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.118s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)