Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 2700U is suited for all applications.

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3450U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is a mobile SoC that was announced in Q2 2020 as a refresh. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.5 GHz (-200 MHz versus 3500U) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3450U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1115G4 and also the Ryzen 3 4300U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a better-than-expected result for an aging lower mid-range chip that is the 3450U, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. These values are fairly high, making active cooling solutions something of a necessity.

The CPU is built with a somewhat old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700UAMD Ryzen 5 3450UAMD Ryzen 5 3580U
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZenPicasso-U (Zen+)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2200 - 3800 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm12 nm12 nm
SocketAM4FP5FP5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 2700U
26.5 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3450U
25.1 pt (35%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
26.2 pt (36%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3603 Points (3%)
min: 2658     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (3%)     max: 3195 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
886 Points (38%)
min: 858     avg: 875     median: 875 (37%)     max: 892 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 347     avg: 361.3     median: 356 (40%)     max: 381 Points
min: 292     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (36%)     max: 351 Points
352 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1392     avg: 1439     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1504 Points
min: 1089     avg: 1168     median: 1168 (3%)     max: 1247 Points
1549 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 546     avg: 640     median: 644 (4%)     max: 719 Points
min: 530     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (4%)     max: 603 Points
693 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 141.9     median: 143.5 (43%)     max: 150 Points
min: 137     avg: 137.5     median: 137.5 (41%)     max: 138 Points
139 Points (42%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.88     avg: 7     median: 7.5 (10%)     max: 7.66 Points
7.8 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.58     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (41%)     max: 1.71 Points
1.7 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4379     avg: 4474     median: 4515 (27%)     max: 4527 Points
4525 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9812     avg: 13528     median: 13729 (10%)     max: 17043 Points
18307 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.1     avg: 269.1     median: 269.1 (3%)     max: 270.1 s
274.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.3     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.8 s
7.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2924 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
17317 MIPS (10%)
min: 15163     avg: 15782     median: 15878 (9%)     max: 16305 MIPS
15209 MIPS (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3592 MIPS (43%)
min: 3355     avg: 3375     median: 3359 (40%)     max: 3411 MIPS
3572 MIPS (43%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
36.4 fps (13%)
40.1 fps (14%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
128 fps (30%)
135.3 fps (31%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4 fps (7%)
min: 2.77     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.43 fps
4.1 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.5 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
713 Seconds (5%)
min: 834     avg: 919     median: 946 (7%)     max: 976 Seconds
710 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (18%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.806 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5366     avg: 5838     median: 6072 (13%)     max: 6076 Points
5545 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.8 s (3%)
12 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.3 s (1%)
27.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
698 s (3%)
694 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 19828     avg: 20243     median: 20242.5 (18%)     max: 20657 Points
21501 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3205     avg: 5438     median: 5445 (15%)     max: 6952 Points
min: 4968     avg: 5979     median: 6400 (17%)     max: 6568 Points
6856 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 33097     avg: 33808     median: 33808 (27%)     max: 34519 Points
47473 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
33326 Points (27%)
48287 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27944     avg: 29171     median: 28356.5 (24%)     max: 32027 Points
27926 Points (24%)
52082 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4058     avg: 5240     median: 5232 (13%)     max: 7076 Points
min: 5106     avg: 5779     median: 5984 (15%)     max: 6248 Points
6687 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6059     avg: 8060     median: 7851 (14%)     max: 9911 Points
min: 8985     avg: 9259     median: 9204 (16%)     max: 9587 Points
9805 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2750     avg: 2868     median: 2868 (12%)     max: 2986 Points
min: 1887     avg: 2208     median: 2170 (9%)     max: 2567 Points
2898 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (34%)
min: 698     avg: 819     median: 839 (35%)     max: 866 Points
900 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2969 Points (5%)
min: 2565     avg: 2918     median: 2972 (5%)     max: 3123 Points
2990 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
853 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2630 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3357     avg: 3487     median: 3495 (35%)     max: 3610 Points
3486 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5034     avg: 7595     median: 8582 (9%)     max: 9169 Points
10200 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3331 Points (45%)
3908 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8210 Points (20%)
11829 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10423     avg: 11434     median: 11433.5 (20%)     max: 12444 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3136     avg: 3249     median: 3248.5 (63%)     max: 3361 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1193     avg: 1408     median: 1361 (2%)     max: 1686 ms
min: 1170     avg: 1185     median: 1185 (1%)     max: 1200 ms
1243 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
217.4 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20231     avg: 25163     median: 26482 (24%)     max: 27727 Points
28517 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
142 Points (30%)
min: 145     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (30%)     max: 146 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 707     avg: 722     median: 722 (28%)     max: 737 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37.3 Watt (6%)
41.1 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
36.2 Watt (7%)
40 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.6 Points per Watt (11%)
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700U → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3450U → 96% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 111% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 03:54:36

#0 checking url part for id 9314 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13235 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9314 +0.021s ... 0.066s

#8 got single benchmarks 9314 +0.04s ... 0.106s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13235 +0.016s ... 0.122s

#10 got single benchmarks 13235 +0.016s ... 0.138s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.012s ... 0.15s

#12 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.011s ... 0.161s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.161s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.395s ... 0.556s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.556s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)