Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is a powerful mobile processor from the Krackan Point family that was announced at CES in early 2025. The APU integrates 8 CPU cores (4x Zen 5 with up to 5 GHz and 4x Zen 5c with less cache and a maximum of 3.5 GHz) and a big 16 MB L3-Cache.

Architecture and features

The Krackan Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores located in separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the size of the cache; the Zen 5 cores have larger caches available.

However, the mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) is closer to desktop Zen 4 than desktop Zen 5 due to the different cache sizes, large differences in AVX-512 throughput, and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is much more complex than the first generation XDNA, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As usual with laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI chip cannot be replaced by the user as it is soldered.

Performance

Thanks to the Zen 5 architecture and the high clock rates, the CPU performance should be very good.

Graphics

The Radeon 860M is the direct successor to the Radeon 760M and offers 8 cores (CUs = 512 shaders) and clocks at up to 3 GHz. It uses the new RDNA 3.5 architecture.

Power consumption

The AI 350 is said to have a base TDP of 28 W, although laptop manufacturers are free to set the TDP between 15 and 54 W.

The 4 nm TSMC process with which these CPUs are manufactured ensures above-average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 260AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Krackan Point (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
4 x 3.5 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 860M ( - 3000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.4 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 350
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 105.3     median: 105.3 (59%)     max: 106.5 Points
min: 113.5     avg: 115.6     median: 115.2 (65%)     max: 118 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 786     avg: 893     median: 893 (17%)     max: 1000 Points
min: 720     avg: 882     median: 905 (17%)     max: 977 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15864     avg: 16788     median: 16788 (16%)     max: 17712 Points
min: 12873     avg: 16135     median: 16474 (15%)     max: 17899 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1760     avg: 1781     median: 1780.5 (75%)     max: 1801 Points
min: 1943     avg: 1969     median: 1966 (83%)     max: 2006 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 690     avg: 694     median: 693.5 (76%)     max: 697 Points
min: 761     avg: 772     median: 770.5 (84%)     max: 784 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6161     avg: 6565     median: 6565 (16%)     max: 6969 Points
min: 5005     avg: 6326     median: 6542 (16%)     max: 6990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2564     avg: 2698     median: 2697.5 (17%)     max: 2831 Points
min: 1932     avg: 2469     median: 2514 (16%)     max: 2660 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 278     avg: 280.5     median: 280.5 (78%)     max: 283 Points
min: 204     avg: 279.1     median: 297.5 (82%)     max: 305 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30.1 Points (39%)
min: 28.96     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (39%)     max: 30.75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
min: 3.59     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (85%)     max: 3.6 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7384 Points (45%)
min: 8478     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (51%)     max: 8486 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
45689 Points (33%)
min: 48792     avg: 49866     median: 49865.5 (36%)     max: 50939 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89153 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15483 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 68.229     avg: 171     median: 171 (2%)     max: 273.713 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.069     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 5.935 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7121 Points (11%)
min: 6.46     avg: 3177     median: 3176.7 (5%)     max: 6347 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 63076     avg: 67982     median: 67982 (39%)     max: 72888 MIPS
min: 48124     avg: 57251     median: 59333 (34%)     max: 63807 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6439     avg: 6468     median: 6468 (76%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 5544     avg: 6011     median: 6065 (71%)     max: 6162 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
144.6 fps (48%)
155.1 fps (52%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
269.1 fps (62%)
319 fps (74%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17.6     avg: 20     median: 20 (35%)     max: 22.4 fps
min: 16.5     avg: 20.6     median: 21.1 (37%)     max: 22.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (31%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (32%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
min: 9.1     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (26%)     max: 10.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 290     avg: 306     median: 306 (4%)     max: 322 Seconds
min: 283     avg: 326.3     median: 317.5 (4%)     max: 399 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 183     avg: 193.5     median: 193.5 (1%)     max: 204 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 204.5     median: 196.5 (1%)     max: 249 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4454     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4465 sec
min: 0.403     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4275 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14995 Points (32%)
min: 14510     avg: 15492     median: 15605 (33%)     max: 16362 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
min: 8.541     avg: 8.7     median: 8.7 (2%)     max: 8.947 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
min: 18.179     avg: 31.9     median: 31.9 (1%)     max: 45.607 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
529 s (2%)
8.7 s (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 72985     avg: 76362     median: 77404 (59%)     max: 78696 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17725     avg: 21327     median: 21326.5 (53%)     max: 24928 Points
min: 13154     avg: 19142     median: 20054 (49%)     max: 21246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84022 Points (68%)
min: 74698     avg: 76861     median: 77651 (63%)     max: 78233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 77917     avg: 78292     median: 78291.5 (64%)     max: 78666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 72599     avg: 75260     median: 75259.5 (60%)     max: 77920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19375 Points (49%)
min: 16181     avg: 18215     median: 18475.5 (47%)     max: 19728 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25641     avg: 27521     median: 27520.5 (49%)     max: 29400 Points
min: 21629     avg: 27801     median: 28257 (50%)     max: 29557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9216     avg: 9965     median: 9965 (42%)     max: 10714 Points
min: 8566     avg: 10130     median: 10375 (44%)     max: 11005 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2622     avg: 2653     median: 2652.5 (66%)     max: 2683 Points
min: 1874     avg: 2752     median: 2863 (72%)     max: 2882 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10180     avg: 11765     median: 11764.5 (46%)     max: 13349 Points
min: 10774     avg: 13007     median: 13470 (52%)     max: 14028 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1948     avg: 1967     median: 1967 (77%)     max: 1986 Points
min: 1313     avg: 1996     median: 2105 (82%)     max: 2135 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9848     avg: 11223     median: 11222.5 (20%)     max: 12597 Points
min: 9997     avg: 11533     median: 11791 (21%)     max: 12458 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1247     avg: 1736     median: 1970 (9%)     max: 1992 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10194     avg: 11057     median: 11207 (35%)     max: 11769 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5708     avg: 7251     median: 7765 (78%)     max: 8281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41544     avg: 42707     median: 41591 (41%)     max: 44985 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
7721 Points (85%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
41046 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
494 ms (1%)
min: 431     avg: 478.1     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 693 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
105241 Points (77%)
min: 105563     avg: 114061     median: 115427 (84%)     max: 119825 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
261 Points (72%)
min: 242     avg: 264.5     median: 271 (74%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 276     avg: 292     median: 292 (52%)     max: 308 Points
min: 260     avg: 309.6     median: 322.5 (58%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1792 Points (67%)
min: 1666     avg: 1810     median: 1805 (68%)     max: 2005 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 68.3     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (17%)     max: 128.6 Watt
min: 39.8     avg: 76.7     median: 70.3 (12%)     max: 106.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
139 Watt (25%)
min: 39.2     avg: 80.3     median: 81.8 (15%)     max: 115.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 4.06     avg: 11.1     median: 11.1 (7%)     max: 18.2 Watt
min: 3.7     avg: 6     median: 5.3 (3%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 4.35     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 9.03 Watt
min: 5.05     avg: 6.6     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 8.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 R7 260 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 21     avg: 33.3     median: 32.2 (24%)     max: 49.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 → 241% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 22:29:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19172 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756499399s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Aug 2025 05:18:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 19156 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19172 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 19172 +0.015s ... 0.034s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.083s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)