Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U vs Intel Core i7-1280P

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 6650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The Ryzen has six out of a possible eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is the professional version of the consumer R5 6600U with additional management features and the Microsoft Pluton Security processor. Compared to the similar R5 6650H, the 6850U offers a lower base clock speed and a lower TDP.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

Performance

The average 6650U in our database is very close to the Core i7-1260P and the Core i7-10870H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a really good result, as of late 2022.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 32 W, the ThinkPad T16 G1 is among the fastest laptops built around the 6650U that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6650U only offers the small Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock rate.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 - 28 Watts (default). The power efficiency should be very good, thanks to the improved 6nm process and additional power saving features in the 6000 series.

Intel Core i7-1280P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1280P

The Intel Core i7-1280P is the flagship Alder Lake-P CPU, which is to say, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2022 and it has 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for whopping 20 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 1.8 GHz to 4.8 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.3 GHz to 3.6 GHz for the efficiency cluster. This is the only hexa-core 28 W Alder Lake CPU as of February 2022, trumping what the more affordable i7-1270P and i7-1260P have in store. Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of a Core i7-1280P's CPU cores enjoy access to 24 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 64 GB of LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200 RAM. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1280P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The average 1280P in our database delivers multi-thread benchmarks scores that are most similar to those of the Ryzen 9 5900HS, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and also the Core i9-11980HK.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1280P that we know of. It can be roughly 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.45 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. An Iris Xe Graphics G7 will let you use up to 4 monitors simultaneously, provided the laptop has the ports required.

The graphics adapter will let you play most games at 1080p / Medium settings to be very close to NVIDIA's MX350.

That being said, the Xe's gaming performance is bound to be tied to how high the Power Limits and how competent the cooling solution of a laptop are. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as well (the Iris Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory).

Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP value or the PL1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). The "Minimum Assured" power consumption is fairly high at 20 watts. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i7-1280P is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. This is still a rather power-hungry CPU; a single P-core will happily eat more than 20 W and even ask for more when under heavy load. A couple of higher-end 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are noticeably more modest than the i7 while delivering the same or higher performance levels.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650UIntel Core i7-1280P
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Alder Lake-P
CodenameRembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)Alder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-P
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U compare2.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U « 2.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1280P « 1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4500 MHz1300 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache3 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1214 / 20
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2BGA1744
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Rem. Platf. Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 6650U
37 pt (51%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1280P
39.9 pt (55%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7805     avg: 8762     median: 8854 (8%)     max: 9534 Points
min: 8632     avg: 11685     median: 11666 (11%)     max: 14803 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1439     avg: 1460     median: 1463 (62%)     max: 1476 Points
min: 1609     avg: 1670     median: 1651 (70%)     max: 1787 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 548     avg: 567     median: 570 (63%)     max: 578 Points
min: 615     avg: 642     median: 629 (70%)     max: 701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3057     avg: 3399     median: 3427.5 (8%)     max: 3684 Points
min: 3283     avg: 4627     median: 4677.5 (11%)     max: 5415 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1299     avg: 1443     median: 1459.5 (9%)     max: 1555 Points
min: 1905     avg: 2120     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2332 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 230     avg: 232.3     median: 232.5 (70%)     max: 234 Points
min: 203     avg: 237.3     median: 238 (72%)     max: 258 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.2 Points (21%)
25.2 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (69%)
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6062 Points (37%)
8881 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32262 Points (23%)
46007 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
70566 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14362 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
243.3 s (3%)
1168 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.7 s (2%)
34 s (7%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
1165 s (5%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
28 s (15%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5343 Points (8%)
7082 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 32613     avg: 37464     median: 37856.5 (22%)     max: 41530 MIPS
min: 45292     avg: 49730     median: 49572 (28%)     max: 53710 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5175     avg: 5265     median: 5228.5 (63%)     max: 5427 MIPS
min: 4995     avg: 5488     median: 5540 (66%)     max: 5874 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
86.3 fps (30%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
224.3 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.71     avg: 10.1     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 11.8 fps
min: 9.62     avg: 12.5     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 14.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.5 GB/s (14%)
11.8 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 565     avg: 740     median: 712.5 (9%)     max: 968 Seconds
min: 490     avg: 566     median: 537 (7%)     max: 741 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 328     avg: 415.6     median: 397 (3%)     max: 548 Seconds
min: 259     avg: 281.7     median: 285 (2%)     max: 309 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.521     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.59 sec
min: 0.4505     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.512 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11322 Points (24%)
6579 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.9 s (2%)
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.4 s (1%)
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
712 s (3%)
366 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
37700 Points (33%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11332     avg: 12182     median: 12335 (33%)     max: 12727 Points
min: 11415     avg: 15372     median: 15372.5 (42%)     max: 18478 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 65436     avg: 69641     median: 69640.5 (57%)     max: 73845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9476     avg: 11014     median: 11062 (28%)     max: 12455 Points
min: 7264     avg: 12588     median: 12154 (31%)     max: 17047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14814     avg: 17055     median: 16969 (30%)     max: 19469 Points
min: 15398     avg: 19695     median: 19017.5 (34%)     max: 25756 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5400     avg: 5555     median: 5457.5 (23%)     max: 5904 Points
min: 6205     avg: 8459     median: 7672.5 (32%)     max: 12031 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1433     avg: 1456     median: 1452.5 (61%)     max: 1487 Points
min: 1571     avg: 1701     median: 1746 (74%)     max: 1802 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6171     avg: 6594     median: 6488.5 (12%)     max: 7227 Points
min: 9623     avg: 10839     median: 11191 (20%)     max: 11811 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1417 Points (6%)
min: 1685     avg: 1706     median: 1694 (7%)     max: 1738 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7218 Points (23%)
min: 9886     avg: 10561     median: 10537 (33%)     max: 11260 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5910 Points (59%)
7522 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28857 Points (32%)
40196 Points (44%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 615     avg: 646     median: 631.5 (1%)     max: 707 ms
min: 526     avg: 563     median: 538 (1%)     max: 683 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
95.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
72306 Points (65%)
min: 83104     avg: 84579     median: 84578.5 (76%)     max: 86053 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 176.4     avg: 188.3     median: 185.4 (53%)     max: 206 Points
min: 232     avg: 247.2     median: 248.5 (71%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 225     avg: 233.5     median: 233.5 (49%)     max: 242 Points
min: 203     avg: 271.3     median: 286 (60%)     max: 290 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1338     avg: 1396     median: 1419 (54%)     max: 1432 Points
min: 1652     avg: 1704     median: 1690 (65%)     max: 1773 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.5     avg: 41.3     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 49.6 Watt
min: 40.8     avg: 56.1     median: 54.3 (9%)     max: 73.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 43.6     avg: 49.6     median: 50.5 (9%)     max: 54.7 Watt
min: 45.3     avg: 65.3     median: 65.1 (12%)     max: 90.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (3%)     max: 6.59 Watt
min: 3.08     avg: 8.5     median: 8.7 (6%)     max: 13.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.41     avg: 4.5     median: 4.7 (5%)     max: 5.55 Watt
min: 4.07     avg: 10.5     median: 10.2 (11%)     max: 17.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 28.1     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (22%)     max: 31.7 Points per Watt
min: 25.7     avg: 32.6     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 46.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1280P → 126% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 11:26:22

#0 checking url part for id 14384 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14059 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14384 +0.019s ... 0.066s

#7 got single benchmarks 14384 +0.021s ... 0.088s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14059 +0.023s ... 0.11s

#9 got single benchmarks 14059 +0.047s ... 0.157s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.157s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.415s ... 0.572s

#12 return log +0.029s ... 0.601s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)