Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core desktop processor that can handle twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 40% more efficient than the 95 W TDP Ryzen 5 2600 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 3.9 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 2600 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 5 2600's six cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has good performance in games. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock than the Ryzen 7 2700. Seeing as many games currently lack multi-core support, this means that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs better than its technically superior sibling.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 5 2600.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2017. It combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. The TDP can be configured by the laptop manufacturer between 12 to 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal) and therefore the APU is also suited for thin and light laptops. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance of the Zen CPU cores should be better than a high end Kaby-Lake-Refresh Quad-Core CPU (e.g. the Core i7-8650U) according to AMD. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 2700U is suited for all applications.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+)Zen
Clock3400 - 3900 MHz2200 - 3800 MHz
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
Die Size213 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U « 2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
L1 Cache384 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600
29.7 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 2700U
26.5 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3603 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
886 Points (38%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
380 Points (42%)
min: 347     avg: 361.3     median: 356 (40%)     max: 381 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2793 Points (7%)
min: 1392     avg: 1439     median: 1422 (3%)     max: 1504 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1245     avg: 1254     median: 1248 (8%)     max: 1270 Points
min: 546     avg: 640     median: 644 (4%)     max: 719 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 155.9     avg: 157.4     median: 157.3 (47%)     max: 159 Points
min: 134     avg: 141.9     median: 143.5 (43%)     max: 150 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.7 Points (18%)
min: 5.88     avg: 7     median: 7.5 (10%)     max: 7.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
min: 1.58     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (41%)     max: 1.71 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4726 Points (29%)
min: 4379     avg: 4474     median: 4515 (27%)     max: 4527 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28173 Points (20%)
min: 9812     avg: 13528     median: 13729 (10%)     max: 17043 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
45033 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8024 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
140.9 s (2%)
min: 268.1     avg: 269.1     median: 269.1 (3%)     max: 270.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.5 s (1%)
min: 8.3     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.8 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R5 2600 +
4517 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
30898 MIPS (18%)
17317 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4020 MIPS (48%)
3592 MIPS (43%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
75 fps (26%)
36.4 fps (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
205.3 fps (47%)
128 fps (30%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.79     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 7.82 fps
4 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R5 2600 +
0.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R5 2600 +
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R5 2600 +
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 374.2     avg: 375     median: 375 (3%)     max: 375.7 Seconds
713 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
0.8 sec (18%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9290 Points (20%)
min: 5366     avg: 5838     median: 6072 (13%)     max: 6076 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.2 s (2%)
11.8 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.3 s (1%)
27.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
615 s (3%)
698 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
43794 Points (38%)
min: 19828     avg: 20243     median: 20242.5 (18%)     max: 20657 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12405 Points (34%)
min: 3205     avg: 5438     median: 5445 (15%)     max: 6952 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
69692 Points (57%)
min: 33097     avg: 33808     median: 33808 (27%)     max: 34519 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
69478 Points (56%)
33326 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
70522 Points (59%)
min: 27944     avg: 29171     median: 28356.5 (24%)     max: 32027 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11219 Points (28%)
min: 4058     avg: 5240     median: 5232 (13%)     max: 7076 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
17063 Points (30%)
min: 6059     avg: 8060     median: 7851 (14%)     max: 9911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6265 Points (26%)
min: 2750     avg: 2868     median: 2868 (12%)     max: 2986 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1014     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (47%)     max: 1223 Points
813 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5767     avg: 6070     median: 6069.5 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
2969 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
1020 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
5885 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4631     avg: 5109     median: 5109 (51%)     max: 5587 Points
min: 3357     avg: 3487     median: 3495 (35%)     max: 3610 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20633     avg: 23018     median: 23018 (26%)     max: 25403 Points
min: 5034     avg: 7595     median: 8582 (10%)     max: 9169 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3331 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8210 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10423     avg: 11434     median: 11433.5 (20%)     max: 12444 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3136     avg: 3249     median: 3248.5 (63%)     max: 3361 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
951 ms (1%)
min: 1193     avg: 1408     median: 1361 (2%)     max: 1686 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
217.4 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20231     avg: 25163     median: 26482 (24%)     max: 27727 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
179 Points (37%)
142 Points (30%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
157.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
149.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8.5 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700U → 69% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 15:15:53

#0 checking url part for id 10032 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9314 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10032 +0.018s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 10032 +0.011s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9314 +0.02s ... 0.073s

#9 got single benchmarks 9314 +0.037s ... 0.11s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.306s ... 0.416s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.438s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)