Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Celeron N4020 vs Intel Celeron J4125

Intel Pentium N4200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium N4200 is an Apollo Lake family, quad-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its four cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.5 GHz, with only 2.4 GHz available when all the cores are fully loaded; there is no Hyper-Threading here and thus no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 505, and eats very little (~6 W).

Curiously enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Pentium as of early 2023.

Architecture

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Pentium is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products such as the Raspberry Pi series.

The Pentium N4200 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture that came to replace Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations, making for a double-digit IPC improvement.

The Pentium is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Pentium is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N4200 in our database competes with the Core i5-3339Y, a power efficient chip launched in 2013, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the (much less ancient) Celeron 6305 lurking a little behind the two. In other words, the Pentium is a slow processor suitable for the most basic tasks only. As of 2021, it is light years behind the latest processors making use of high-performance architectures, such as the Zen 2-powered AMD Ryzen 3 5300U.

The Acer Aspire ES 17 ES1-732 is among the fastest laptops built around the N4200 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster than the slowest system featuring the same CPU in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 505 (18 EUs) is a rather good iGPU, considering this is a lower-end SoC released in 2016 we are talking about. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD 505 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors simultaneously at up to 2160p60. It will also happily decode VP9 and AVC, the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on as of 2021.

The UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz. Its actual clock speed will be much lower than that, since the small power budget has to be shared between the iGPU and the CPU cores. Expect most games to run terrible, even ones that were released in 2012 or 2010.

Power consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N4200 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the Power Limit 1), making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by just one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, improves the chip's performance by a huge margin, speaking subjectively.

This Pentium is built with a 14 nm Intel process making for poor energy efficiency (considering 14 nm processes are really old as of mid 2022).

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron J4125

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4125

The Intel Celeron J4125 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2-2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (2019 refresh). Compared to the predecessor, the refresh offers slightly higher clock speeds. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, partial Wi-Fi 5 support, all in a smaller package. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4125 in our database outguns the AMD 3050e just slightly, the latter being a dual-core, Zen-based, entry-level processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that's good for basic day-to-day activities only.

The Beelink GK Mini is one of the fastest systems built around the J4125 that we know of. It can be roughly 70% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 10 W. This is low enough, allowing laptop makers to ditch fans while building a passively cooled laptop, tablet or mini-PC around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4125 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium N4200Intel Celeron N4020Intel Celeron J4125
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameApollo LakeGemini Lake refreshGemini Lake Refresh
Clock1100 - 2500 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 2700 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 24 / 4
TDP6 Watt6 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1296BGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesDDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AESDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 505 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$161 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J41252 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50301.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 « 2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N40201.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
16.1 pt (22%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4125
17.8 pt (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
616 Points (1%)
min: 860     avg: 1203     median: 1186 (1%)     max: 1563 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
308 Points (13%)
min: 392     avg: 425.3     median: 438 (19%)     max: 446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
min: 155     avg: 166.2     median: 170 (19%)     max: 174 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
min: 304     avg: 449.2     median: 430 (1%)     max: 610 Points
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
min: 148     avg: 223.4     median: 243 (2%)     max: 271 Points
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (22%)     max: 78.9 Points
min: 63.1     avg: 72.5     median: 75.3 (23%)     max: 79.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.02     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (3%)     max: 2.27 Points
min: 2.13     avg: 2.8     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.09 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.64     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.66 Points
0.9 Points (23%)
min: 0.84     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.92 Points
2184 Points (13%)
min: 2070     avg: 2159     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2295 Points
min: 4102     avg: 6188     median: 7128 (5%)     max: 7335 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7699     avg: 7766     median: 7766 (5%)     max: 7833 Points
min: 9697     avg: 10201     median: 10201 (7%)     max: 10705 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2375     avg: 2392     median: 2392 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
min: 3669     avg: 3690     median: 3690 (4%)     max: 3711 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 704     avg: 714     median: 714 (8%)     max: 724 s
min: 566     avg: 608     median: 603 (7%)     max: 654.159 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 20.13     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (5%)     max: 25.03 s
min: 17.3     avg: 18     median: 17.4 (3%)     max: 19.42 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
944 Points (1%)
min: 1019     avg: 1069     median: 1048 (2%)     max: 1140 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
4498 MIPS (3%)
min: 5694     avg: 7248     median: 7494 (4%)     max: 8399 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2456 MIPS (29%)
min: 2237     avg: 2358     median: 2369 (28%)     max: 2444 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
min: 11.31     avg: 13.7     median: 13.1 (5%)     max: 16.75 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60 fps (14%)
min: 52.6     avg: 64.3     median: 61.4 (14%)     max: 78.9 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
min: 0.95     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (3%)     max: 1.61 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.163     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.182 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
min: 0.196     avg: 0.2     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.266 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (4%)
min: 1.8     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (5%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7856 Seconds (100%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4064 Seconds (29%)
min: 2198     avg: 2772     median: 2391 (17%)     max: 3860 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
min: 1.525     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (34%)     max: 1.579 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2636 Points (6%)
min: 2373     avg: 3327     median: 3740 (8%)     max: 3869 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
31.4 s (7%)
min: 24.57     avg: 31.6     median: 24.6 (5%)     max: 45.52 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
68.4 s (3%)
min: 55.9     avg: 68.9     median: 57.4 (2%)     max: 93.4 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1453 s (6%)
min: 1332.53     avg: 3652     median: 1845 (8%)     max: 7778 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4306 Points (4%)
min: 3522     avg: 5431     median: 5430.5 (5%)     max: 7339 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 2348     avg: 2705     median: 2706 (7%)     max: 2986 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 15955     avg: 18834     median: 18514.5 (15%)     max: 22351 Points
min: 10102     avg: 19782     median: 19782 (16%)     max: 29462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9441     avg: 16242     median: 17153 (14%)     max: 21222 Points
min: 11105     avg: 23313     median: 29231 (24%)     max: 29602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17050     avg: 22089     median: 22096 (19%)     max: 26889 Points
min: 17507     avg: 26606     median: 26606 (22%)     max: 35705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1574     avg: 1754     median: 1727 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
1286 Points (3%)
min: 1196     avg: 2273     median: 2485 (6%)     max: 2804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2608     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 3054 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
min: 1602     avg: 3372     median: 3689 (7%)     max: 4271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 642     avg: 694     median: 668 (3%)     max: 771 Points
476 Points (2%)
min: 876     avg: 994     median: 984 (4%)     max: 1122 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
345 Points (15%)
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (19%)     max: 475 Points
min: 435     avg: 454.2     median: 455 (19%)     max: 466 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
935 Points (2%)
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
min: 1198     avg: 1367     median: 1394 (2%)     max: 1512 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 451     avg: 455.7     median: 453 (2%)     max: 463 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1163     avg: 1388     median: 1482 (5%)     max: 1519 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1544     avg: 1576     median: 1571.5 (16%)     max: 1616 Points
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
min: 1922     avg: 1948     median: 1924 (19%)     max: 1997 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4468     avg: 4604     median: 4608.5 (5%)     max: 4729 Points
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (4%)     max: 3462 Points
min: 4246     avg: 5158     median: 5468 (6%)     max: 5761 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1526     avg: 1563     median: 1560.5 (21%)     max: 1609 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4162     avg: 4385     median: 4376.5 (11%)     max: 4558 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4425     avg: 4593     median: 4595 (8%)     max: 4736 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1362     avg: 1394     median: 1395.5 (27%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1498 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3199 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2447 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4201 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4784 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3954 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2966     avg: 3044     median: 3027 (4%)     max: 3142 ms
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
min: 2216     avg: 2258     median: 2276 (3%)     max: 2291 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
232 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8632     avg: 11881     median: 12856 (12%)     max: 13290 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (16%)     max: 61.1 Points
68.2 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (17%)     max: 84.2 Points
min: 86.2     avg: 89.2     median: 88.7 (18%)     max: 93.2 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5998 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
340 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.5 Watt (2%)
min: 7.87     avg: 12.5     median: 12.4 (2%)     max: 17.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.1 Watt (2%)
min: 9.24     avg: 11     median: 11.4 (2%)     max: 12.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 13     avg: 18.4     median: 19.8 (15%)     max: 22.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium N4200 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 93% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4125 → 124% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 16. 00:29:31

#0 checking url part for id 8180 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12749 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8180 +0.002s ... 0.048s

#8 got single benchmarks 8180 +0.053s ... 0.101s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.014s ... 0.115s

#10 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.045s ... 0.159s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12749 +0.012s ... 0.172s

#12 got single benchmarks 12749 +0.014s ... 0.186s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.186s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.373s ... 0.559s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.559s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)