ARM Mali-G77 MP9 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP20
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G77MP9 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 (and 1000+). It integrates 9 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation (G76).
The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.
Qualcomm Adreno 642 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC . The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.
The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
ARM Mali-G71 MP20 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G71 MP20 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was e.g. used in smartphone chip Samsung Exynos 9 8895 . It features 20 clusters and is manufactured in 10nm FinFET (in the Exynos 8895). The performance is in the high-end class and therefore all current Android games should run fluently on the chip.
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 Qualcomm Adreno 642 ARM Mali-G71 MP20 Mali-G Series Codename Valhall Mimir Architecture Valhall Bifrost Pipelines 9 - unified 8 - unified Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 7 nm 5 nm 16 nm Date of Announcement 19.03.2020 07.05.2021 29.03.2017 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com www.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Core Speed 900 (Boost) MHz
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
60765 Points (7%)
min: 33077 avg: 35410 median: 36347 (4%) max: 36807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7612 avg: 8312 median: 8226 (36%) max: 9182 Points
5587 Points (24%)
min: 3222 avg: 3555 median: 3426 (15%) max: 4016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9823 avg: 11258 median: 11692.5 (26%) max: 11824 Points
8380 Points (18%)
min: 3896 avg: 4314 median: 4137 (9%) max: 4908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6890 avg: 7321 median: 7393.5 (37%) max: 7606 Points
4478 Points (22%)
min: 2648 avg: 3058 median: 3261 (16%) max: 3265 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7501 avg: 8264 median: 8477 (25%) max: 8601 Points
6148 Points (18%)
min: 2723 avg: 3293 median: 3571 (11%) max: 3584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4194 avg: 4405 median: 4405 (2%) max: 4578 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1205 avg: 1258 median: 1256 (1%) max: 1300 Points
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.4 (4%) max: 9.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7 avg: 19.6 median: 21 (4%) max: 22 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 46 avg: 51.3 median: 51.5 (4%) max: 56 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 39 avg: 44.5 median: 44.5 (5%) max: 50 fps
40 fps (5%)
25 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 45 avg: 69.8 median: 78 (2%) max: 79 fps
65 fps (1%)
min: 24 avg: 36 median: 42 (1%) max: 42 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 49 avg: 101.5 median: 115 (7%) max: 129 fps
90 fps (5%)
min: 50 avg: 54.3 median: 51 (3%) max: 62 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 176 avg: 185.4 median: 182.5 (1%) max: 202 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP20
min: 104 avg: 110 median: 105 (1%) max: 121 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 194863 avg: 220826 median: 221937 (28%) max: 248060 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 41022 avg: 41847 median: 42183 (96%) max: 42335 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 41901 avg: 43072 median: 43464 (97%) max: 43852 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 44.45 avg: 56.6 median: 53.8 (0%) max: 71.3 fps
48 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
24.8 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
4700 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
4718 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 24859 avg: 29891 median: 29132.5 (29%) max: 36439 Points
7552 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 24901 avg: 32263 median: 32888 (58%) max: 38376 Points
2573 Points (5%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 3D Graphics Mark
28414 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0 avg: 5.1 median: 6.1 (2%) max: 6.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 100% n=8 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 76% n=8 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 47% n=8
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
56.5 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 [X] Xiaomi 11T 1.61.6
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
59.3 [X] OnePlus Nord 2T MediaTek Dimensity 1300 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
57 fps, P1:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
60 119 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G71 MP20:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50 59 [X] Xiaomi 11T 3.1.2a
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 2GHz
Mali-G77 MP9
min:
42 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 56 fps
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
119 144 ~ 132 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 115% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 128%
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 56.5 Armajet 60 PUBG Mobile 59 40 37 Asphalt 9: Legends 50 56 Real Racing 3 60 Subway Surfers 132 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 642 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 60 59 60 40 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 1 1 2 1
ARM Mali-G71 MP20 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 30 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 30 Temple Run 2 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 16. 18:35:34
#0 checking url part for id 10491 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7732 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.133s ... 0.134s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.134s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.134s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10491 +0.04s ... 0.174s
#9 got single benchmarks 10491 +0.044s ... 0.218s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.22s
#11 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.006s ... 0.226s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7732 +0.002s ... 0.228s
#13 got single benchmarks 7732 +0.009s ... 0.238s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.238s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.126s ... 0.364s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.364s
#17 Got 42 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.379s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.379s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.384s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.02s ... 0.404s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.404s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.406s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)