ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs ARM Mali-G72 MP18
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in October 2017 in the Huawei Mate 10 and uses 12 clusters (hence the MP12 name). In our benchmarks it performs between a Adreno 530 and 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The G72 is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture and offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
ARM Mali-G72 MP18 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-G72 MP18 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in early 2018 in the Exynos 9810 (e.g. Galaxy S9). It integrates 18 of the 32 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.
In our benchmarks it slightly below a Adreno 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.
The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.
ARM Mali-G72 MP12 Qualcomm Adreno 612 ARM Mali-G72 MP18 Mali-G Series Architecture Bifrost Adreno 600 Bifrost Pipelines 12 - unified 18 - unified Core Speed 850 MHz 850 MHz Shared Memory no yes no API OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 16 nm 14 nm 16 nm Date of Announcement 18.10.2017 15.12.2015 01.01.2018 Link to Manufacturer Page developer.arm.com developer.arm.com Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429 avg: 32596 median: 33740 (4%) max: 36231 Points
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
min: 36190 avg: 43744 median: 46610 (5%) max: 48433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021 avg: 3208 median: 3360.5 (15%) max: 3710 Points
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
min: 3744 avg: 3994 median: 4054.5 (18%) max: 4124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062 avg: 3386 median: 3545 (8%) max: 4040 Points
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
min: 3958 avg: 4626 median: 4820 (11%) max: 4904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2487 avg: 2882 median: 2961.5 (15%) max: 3070 Points
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
min: 3376 avg: 3634 median: 3435 (17%) max: 4291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2597 avg: 2945 median: 3012.5 (9%) max: 3109 Points
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
min: 3697 avg: 4023 median: 3794.5 (11%) max: 4806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (2%) max: 8.7 fps
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
11 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10 avg: 20.6 median: 23 (2%) max: 24 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
31 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11 avg: 20.4 median: 21 (2%) max: 23 fps
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
min: 28 avg: 28.3 median: 28 (3%) max: 29 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 33.9 median: 38.5 (1%) max: 39 fps
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 24 avg: 40.5 median: 45.5 (1%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 23 avg: 54.6 median: 59 (3%) max: 66 fps
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
min: 73 avg: 74 median: 73.5 (4%) max: 76 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 45 avg: 108 median: 118 (1%) max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP18
min: 80 avg: 129.3 median: 145 (1%) max: 147 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
25922 Points (59%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
39033 Points (87%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
8180 Points (8%)
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
min: 8620 avg: 8803 median: 8802.5 (9%) max: 8985 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3761 Points (7%)
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
min: 4747 avg: 4762 median: 4762 (8%) max: 4777 Points
Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 70% n=13 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 126% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
18 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
125%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 [X] Honor 10 0.5.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
20 fps, max:
42 fps
32 [X] Honor Play 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
22 fps, max:
33 fps
33 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
14 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 0.7.0 mit GPU Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
16 fps, max:
42 fps
~ 34 fps
118%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
43 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 43 fps
140%
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 [X] Honor Play 1.24.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
58 [X] Honor 10 1.21.1.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
58 [X] Huawei P20 Pro 1.23.1.2
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 50 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 [X] Huawei P20 1.3.3
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 37 fps
81%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 [X] Huawei P20 3.6.0k
HiSilicon Kirin 970 2.4GHz
Mali-G72 MP12
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 □ 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
83%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 fps
77%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
51 fps
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 107% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 144%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 109% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 120%
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 05. 20:12:10
#0 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 8770 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.136s ... 0.137s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.137s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.137s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.042s ... 0.18s
#9 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.025s ... 0.205s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.002s ... 0.207s
#11 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.021s ... 0.228s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8770 +0.002s ... 0.231s
#13 got single benchmarks 8770 +0.01s ... 0.241s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.241s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.124s ... 0.365s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.365s
#17 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.379s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.379s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.384s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.028s ... 0.411s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.411s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.413s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)