Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M4 (10 cores) vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Apple M4 (10 cores)

► remove from comparison Apple M4 (10 cores)

The 10-core Apple M4 is an impressively fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) sporting 4 performance and 6 efficient CPU cores along with a 16-core neural engine and a 10-core GPU with hardware RT support and other modern features. On-package 7500 MT/s LPDDR5x RAM, USB 4 support and Thunderbolt 4 support are onboard as well, as are Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.

The M4 debuted in May 2024 as part of an iPad launch event; its 4 performance cores run at up to 4.4 GHz, representing a healthy improvement over the M3 (10-core GPU) and its 4.06 GHz top clock speed. Besides, this new chip also has 6 efficient cores at its disposal that run at up to 2.9 GHz. The M3 had to make do with 4 performance cores and 4 efficient cores, for reference.

Architecture and Features

The new CPU cores run at faster clock speeds than what the M3 was capable of while also featuring some minor architectural improvements. A heavily customized version of ARM's v9.4-A microarchitecture is reportedly employed here. The M4 comes with on-package LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (120 GB/s) whereas the M3 was limited to 6400 MT/s. The updated NPU delivers up to 38 TOPS of performance for AI workloads.

Performance

In 2024 iPad Pros, the 3 nm chip is 10% to 20% faster than the M3 (10 GPU cores) in both multi-thread and single-thread short-term workloads. It also delivers about 10% higher multi-thread performance than the 9-core M4. This puts the 10-core part on an equal footing with the Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i7-13705H and other higher-end x86 processors released in 2023 and 2024.

iPad Pros come with no active cooling solution however Mac minis and MacBook Pros do have one and the latest iMacs probably do as well. As our Fall 2024 Mac mini review shows, the M4's short-term performance doesn't benefit much from the presence of a fan, however its sustained performance benefits tremendously.

Graphics

The M4 GPU (10 cores) has hardware support for ray tracing as well as mesh shading and other modern technologies. It supports external displays with resolutions as high as 8K.

The graphics adapter runs at higher clock speeds than what the (otherwise identical) 10-core GPU built into the 9-core M4 can muster. As our Mac mini 2024 review confirmed, its performance is good enough to run many 2023 and 2024 games at 1080p on low or medium quality settings.

Much like it is with CPU performance, M4-powered iPad Pros will be much slower in long-term GPU-intensive workloads than iMacs, Mac minis and MacBook Pros due to the lack of proper cooling.

Power consumption

This specific M4 chip is found in 2024 iPad Pros, 2024 iMacs, 2024 Mac minis and 2024 MacBook Pros. Within the thin metal cases of the iPads - no active cooling - the chip's sustained power consumption hovers in the 4 W - 5 W area, with short-term peaks of up to 14 W possible. However, Mac minis and MacBook Pros do have an active cooling solution (and the new iMacs probably do, too) meaning the power consumption figures are several times higher. In our Fall 2024 Mac mini review, the SoC consumed 30 W to 40 W when under high loads.

The M4 is built with a "second generation" 3 nm TSMC process which is still cutting-edge as of late 2024.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M4 (10 cores)AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
SeriesApple M4AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: M4
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) compare2.59 - 4.51 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M4 (10 cores) « 2.89 - 4.46 GHz10 / 10 cores
Apple M4 (9 cores) compare2.9 - 4.4 GHz9 / 9 cores
Apple M4 (8 cores) compare2.9 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock2890 - 4464 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 10
4 x 4.5 GHz Apple M4 P-Core
6 x 2.9 GHz Apple M4 E-Core
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP40 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL240 Watt54 Watt
Transistors28 Million
Technology3 nm4 nm
FeaturesUnified Memory LPDDR5X-7500 (120 GB/s), 16-Core Neural Engine, Media Engine (Encoding / Decoding: H.264, HEVC, ProRes, ProRes RAW, AV1 Decoding only)DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUApple M4 10-core GPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)
L3 Cache24 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFP8
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 173     avg: 174.2     median: 174 (98%)     max: 177 Points
min: 113.6     avg: 116.6     median: 116 (65%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 815     avg: 921     median: 958 (18%)     max: 986 Points
min: 621     avg: 1060     median: 1135 (21%)     max: 1284 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12335     avg: 13338     median: 13833 (13%)     max: 13845 Points
min: 10435     avg: 20440     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2165     avg: 2202     median: 2173 (91%)     max: 2269 Points
min: 1921     avg: 2010     median: 2018 (85%)     max: 2049 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
565 Points (62%)
min: 753     avg: 789     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3642 Points (9%)
min: 6449     avg: 8372     median: 8830 (22%)     max: 9280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1901     avg: 1907     median: 1907 (12%)     max: 1913 Points
min: 2498.13     avg: 3220     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 300     avg: 302     median: 302 (84%)     max: 304 Points
min: 192.1     avg: 299.8     median: 307 (85%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 38.84     avg: 40.2     median: 40.7 (53%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8639     avg: 8701     median: 8668 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53766     avg: 55510     median: 56074 (41%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 96857     avg: 100361     median: 100569 (64%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 15698     avg: 15853     median: 15927 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.536     avg: 69.8     median: 79.4 (1%)     max: 79.442 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.701     avg: 3.1     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 3.743 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4008     avg: 4286     median: 4090 (6%)     max: 4759 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66154     avg: 78114     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 83714 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5859     avg: 6144     median: 6135 (72%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 169.8     avg: 175.5     median: 171.5 (57%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 304.5     avg: 313.5     median: 306 (71%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.3     avg: 25.1     median: 26.1 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.6     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (47%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.5     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (45%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 15.3     avg: 15.7     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 389     avg: 397     median: 397 (5%)     max: 405 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 239.2     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 139     avg: 156.5     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13761     avg: 16184     median: 16571.5 (35%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.224     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.43 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.504     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (1%)     max: 17.767 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66119     avg: 73944     median: 75793 (58%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17129     avg: 20239     median: 20686 (51%)     max: 23282 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 50952     avg: 59510     median: 61220 (50%)     max: 67655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50955     avg: 60322     median: 61072 (50%)     max: 67802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48351     avg: 58447     median: 59313.5 (48%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16960     avg: 19395     median: 19571 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24918     avg: 29844     median: 30184.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8866     avg: 10400     median: 10519 (44%)     max: 12293 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3655     avg: 3747     median: 3748.5 (94%)     max: 3838 Points
min: 2780     avg: 2881     median: 2876 (72%)     max: 2965 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 14690     avg: 14978     median: 14987.5 (58%)     max: 15173 Points
min: 11973     avg: 14488     median: 14896 (58%)     max: 15994 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2645     avg: 2952     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12664     avg: 18473     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1957     avg: 2083     median: 2098 (82%)     max: 2160 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11394     avg: 14057     median: 14301 (26%)     max: 15759 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1827     avg: 1941     median: 1947 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12962     avg: 14070     median: 14244 (45%)     max: 14828 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8033.5 (80%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42842     avg: 52269     median: 54586.5 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 262     avg: 277.7     median: 265.4 (0%)     max: 318.8 ms
min: 419     avg: 441.1     median: 438 (1%)     max: 503 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 105178     avg: 111471     median: 110817 (81%)     max: 118492 Points
min: 64079     avg: 107304     median: 107598 (79%)     max: 124105 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 315     avg: 335     median: 334 (92%)     max: 348 Points
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 262 (72%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 430     avg: 467.6     median: 478 (86%)     max: 482 Points
min: 252     avg: 307     median: 319 (57%)     max: 347 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
2716980 Points (90%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
743583 Points (22%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1944     avg: 2015     median: 2038 (76%)     max: 2066 Points
min: 1402     avg: 1766     median: 1778 (66%)     max: 1981 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.6     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.3     avg: 94.2     median: 104 (19%)     max: 130.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.68     avg: 3.1     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 4.09 Watt
min: 4.89     avg: 9.1     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.68     avg: 3.9     median: 4.1 (5%)     max: 4.76 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 26.9     avg: 36.1     median: 31.4 (23%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 (10 cores) → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 115% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 14. 20:19:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17538 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755195590s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:18:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17538 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 17538 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.006s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.027s ... 0.047s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.097s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.098s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)