Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon E-2276M vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.4 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional low power cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 45 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card that offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.35 GHz.

Performance - High End

The top model offers all the cores that are built into the chip and clocks relatively high at up to 5.4 GHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet Design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 225H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 14 cores consisting of 4 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 4.9 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.3 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watts (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 130T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.2 GHz.

Performance - High End

Compared to the more powerful variants (such as the top model Core Ultra 9 285H) due to the lack of two P-cores. However, thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should be able to hold its own against its Raptor Lake predecessors. As a result, the CPU is also very suitable for demanding tasks such as gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also comes from TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

ModelIntel Xeon E-2276MIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Core Ultra 5 225H
CodenameCoffee Lake-HArrow Lake-HArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H « 4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4700 MHz4500 - 5400 MHz4300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1216 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
14 / 14
4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP45 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm5 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C110 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 130T ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt115 Watt
$651 U.S.$385 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
31.3 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285H
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 225H
40.6 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 127     avg: 128     median: 127.5 (72%)     max: 130 Points
119.8 Points (67%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 948     median: 928 (17%)     max: 1194 Points
859 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16632     avg: 19352     median: 19347.5 (18%)     max: 22080 Points
16466 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2126     avg: 2145     median: 2145 (90%)     max: 2163 Points
1992 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
484 Points (53%)
min: 810     avg: 821     median: 822 (90%)     max: 830 Points
763 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
min: 6517     avg: 7525     median: 7665 (19%)     max: 8251 Points
6399 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
min: 2797     avg: 3072     median: 3079 (19%)     max: 3333 Points
2626 Points (17%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (54%)     max: 201 Points
min: 311     avg: 314     median: 313.5 (87%)     max: 318 Points
296 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 35.99     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (49%)     max: 40.33 Points
31.5 Points (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.72     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (90%)     max: 3.82 Points
3.6 Points (85%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11459     avg: 11518     median: 11517.5 (70%)     max: 11576 Points
10817 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 72114     avg: 78422     median: 78421.5 (57%)     max: 84729 Points
60850 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111175 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17515 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 104.802     avg: 171.6     median: 171.6 (2%)     max: 238.3 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.3     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
506 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.1 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7690     avg: 12211     median: 12211 (19%)     max: 16732 Points
13090 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
33994 MIPS (20%)
min: 53335     avg: 60499     median: 59492.5 (34%)     max: 69676 MIPS
51720 MIPS (30%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5214 MIPS (61%)
min: 5999     avg: 6173     median: 6137 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
5695 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
363 fps (84%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.7 fps (17%)
min: 18.8     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 25.9 fps
18.5 fps (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (34%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 259     avg: 344     median: 350 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
358 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
384 Seconds (3%)
min: 159     avg: 200     median: 203 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
216 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.4111     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4343 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15781     avg: 16200     median: 16199.5 (34%)     max: 16618 Points
14676 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.084     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
7.9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.516     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.7 s
17.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
704 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81047     avg: 84682     median: 84682 (65%)     max: 88317 Points
81609 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (31%)     max: 13130 Points
min: 19102     avg: 22213     median: 22707.5 (56%)     max: 24334 Points
19195 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96324     avg: 105536     median: 105536 (86%)     max: 114747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97320     avg: 104879     median: 104879 (85%)     max: 112438 Points
104953 Points (85%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
103278 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10449 Points (26%)
min: 20952     avg: 22153     median: 21867 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
19866 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16082 Points (29%)
min: 27803     avg: 33277     median: 35044 (62%)     max: 35532 Points
30932 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6343 Points (27%)
min: 6727     avg: 11151     median: 11650 (49%)     max: 13154 Points
8886 Points (37%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2911     median: 2917.5 (73%)     max: 3110 Points
min: 2678     avg: 2724     median: 2724 (68%)     max: 2770 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15330     avg: 16490     median: 16440 (64%)     max: 17992 Points
min: 12099     avg: 12767     median: 12766.5 (50%)     max: 13434 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1303 Points (51%)
min: 1982     avg: 2111     median: 2102 (82%)     max: 2256 Points
1987 Points (78%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6595 Points (12%)
min: 14243     avg: 15421     median: 15408 (28%)     max: 16626 Points
11570 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2196 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14890 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
5218 Points (52%)
9220 Points (92%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
24150 Points (24%)
54076 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
min: 422     avg: 445.3     median: 450 (1%)     max: 464 ms
458 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
56114 Points (42%)
min: 109360     avg: 115546     median: 115823 (88%)     max: 121454 Points
116620 Points (88%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 254     avg: 296.2     median: 311 (85%)     max: 323.6 Points
294 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
220 Points (39%)
min: 280     avg: 323.3     median: 327.5 (59%)     max: 358 Points
309 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1812     avg: 2069     median: 2118.5 (79%)     max: 2227 Points
1754 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 77.1     median: 61.8 (11%)     max: 131.6 Watt
60.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 95.7     median: 93.4 (17%)     max: 130.5 Watt
69.5 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.27     avg: 11.6     median: 6 (4%)     max: 29.2 Watt
4.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 7.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 10.3 Watt
5.8 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.5     avg: 33.6     median: 33.1 (25%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt
37.8 Points per Watt (28%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285H → 190% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 225H → 169% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 16. 02:32:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18542 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18910 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752625933s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.009s ... 0.03s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18910 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#13 got single benchmarks 18910 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.1s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.1s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)