Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i3-10110U

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-10110U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10110U

The Intel Core i3-10110U is a dual-core SoC of the Comet Lake family. The i3 is designed for use in ultraportable laptops of the more affordable flavor as well as mini-PCs. It was announced in August 2019. Just like the other Comet Lake processors, this Core i3 features several advantages over the outgoing Whiskey Lake family including support for faster memory (up to LPDDR4-2933).

Core i3-10110U runs at 2.1 GHz to 4.1 GHz (only 3.7 GHz are reachable when under multi-thread load). Hyper-Threading support is enabled for 4 processing threads in total.

Performance

The average 10110U in our database shapes up to be a decent entry-level CPU, as of late 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U and also the Core i3-8145U. While not a whole lot faster than Intel's more affordable Pentium Gold and Pentium Silver chips, the i3 will still let you run most apps with virtually no annoying slowdowns.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 runs at up to 1,000 MHz. What makes this specific iGPU peculiar is that it only has 23 Execution Units at its disposal, not the 24 EUs typical for a UHD Graphics 620. Otherwise, it's the usual affair with 4K monitor support (up to three displays at the same time) and a hardware video decoder that's friends with VP9, AVC, HEVC but not the newer AV1 video codec.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the SoC.

The i3-10110U is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processees for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Core i3-10110U
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameJasper LakeComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U compare1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U compare1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U compare1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U « 2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz2100 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10110U
27.1 pt (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
min: 1910     avg: 2142     median: 2142 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
min: 1031     avg: 1033     median: 1032.5 (44%)     max: 1034 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (21%)
min: 400     avg: 402     median: 401 (45%)     max: 405 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
min: 743     avg: 808     median: 753 (2%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
min: 314     avg: 351.8     median: 321 (2%)     max: 405 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (25%)
min: 129     avg: 159     median: 162 (49%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
1.9 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6311     avg: 6349     median: 6349 (38%)     max: 6387 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11023     avg: 11205     median: 11204.5 (8%)     max: 11386 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
14261 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
8184 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
min: 523     avg: 533     median: 533 (6%)     max: 543 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
min: 13.92     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (3%)     max: 17.62 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
min: 1695     avg: 2156     median: 2156 (3%)     max: 2617 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 9858     avg: 10292     median: 10291.5 (6%)     max: 10725 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 4038     avg: 4154     median: 4153.5 (50%)     max: 4269 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
min: 20.55     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (7%)     max: 20.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 106.5     avg: 110.1     median: 110.1 (25%)     max: 113.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 2.72     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (5%)     max: 3.12 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.21     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.346     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (6%)     max: 0.394 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 1174     avg: 1280     median: 1279.5 (9%)     max: 1385 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.76 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
min: 9.404     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (2%)     max: 9.446 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
min: 21.75     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (1%)     max: 22.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
min: 529     avg: 539     median: 538.5 (2%)     max: 548 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
min: 3863     avg: 4262     median: 4157 (11%)     max: 4765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 35890     avg: 39828     median: 40101 (33%)     max: 43494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 34543     avg: 38846     median: 39392 (32%)     max: 42604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 42440     avg: 47299     median: 47408 (40%)     max: 52050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
min: 3489     avg: 3565     median: 3579 (9%)     max: 3627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
min: 5122     avg: 5365     median: 5285 (9%)     max: 5687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
min: 1745     avg: 3394     median: 3394 (14%)     max: 5043 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 957     avg: 987     median: 987 (42%)     max: 1017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 2017     avg: 2026     median: 2025.5 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1002 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2034 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4455 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8289 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4397 Points (60%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7865 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
7335 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7635 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3765 Points (56%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6421 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6567 Points (60%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8305 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8126 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7706 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 1220     avg: 1244     median: 1244 (1%)     max: 1268 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
95.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (22%)
29833 Points (27%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 145     avg: 164     median: 164 (34%)     max: 183 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
46.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
24.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
12.9 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10110U → 197% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 01:10:16

#0 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11463 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.021s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.025s ... 0.073s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11463 +0.024s ... 0.097s

#9 got single benchmarks 11463 +0.043s ... 0.14s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.481s ... 0.621s

#12 return log +0.076s ... 0.697s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)