Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i9-10900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10900K

The Intel Core i9-10900K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5.3 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910Intel Core i9-10900K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K « 3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz3700 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB640 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 2010 / 20
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA 1200
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
51.4 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10900K
55.2 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15821 Points (26%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1374 Points (60%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (58%)
min: 493     avg: 516     median: 524 (60%)     max: 532 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (22%)
min: 5825     avg: 6129     median: 6181 (26%)     max: 6381 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (24%)
min: 2513     avg: 2555     median: 2533 (26%)     max: 2620 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (66%)
min: 206     avg: 215.7     median: 217 (66%)     max: 224 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (36%)
29 Points (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (8%)
2.6 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (66%)
8127 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (65%)
59368 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
80495 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10625 Points (58%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
66.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (50%)
9739 Points (56%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (38%)
min: 67252     avg: 69402     median: 69987 (43%)     max: 70968 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (68%)
min: 5349     avg: 5705     median: 5811 (69%)     max: 5954 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
149 fps (54%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
289.5 fps (68%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (36%)
min: 18.2     avg: 19.7     median: 19.8 (42%)     max: 21 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.6 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
min: 167.3     avg: 178.8     median: 179 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
min: 0.528     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
403.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (51%)
min: 20541     avg: 21539     median: 21935 (60%)     max: 22140 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74951 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75063 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
76898 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19766     avg: 20118     median: 20117.5 (51%)     max: 20469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (47%)
min: 29145     avg: 29466     median: 29447 (54%)     max: 29805 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (58%)
min: 13028     avg: 13470     median: 13056 (64%)     max: 14326 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (60%)
min: 1336     avg: 1404     median: 1428 (62%)     max: 1449 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (36%)
min: 10725     avg: 11177     median: 11393 (40%)     max: 11414 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1330     avg: 1385     median: 1385 (6%)     max: 1440 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10714     avg: 11061     median: 11060.5 (35%)     max: 11407 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5904     avg: 6126     median: 6126 (63%)     max: 6348 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 40236     avg: 41647     median: 41647 (46%)     max: 43058 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 721 (1%)     max: 729 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (58%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (60%)
min: 243     avg: 251     median: 255 (65%)     max: 255 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
275.7 Watt (48%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
268.5 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.8 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10900K → 107% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 30. 09:27:19

#0 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12211 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 30 Jan 2023 08:57:14 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.01s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.007s ... 0.038s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12211 +0.01s ... 0.048s

#9 got single benchmarks 12211 +0.013s ... 0.061s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.176s ... 0.236s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.261s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)