Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10900K vs Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Core i9-10900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10900K

The Intel Core i9-10900K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5.3 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i3-1115G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1115G4

The Intel Core i3-1115G4 is a dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation (UP3) that was launched in September 2020. It integrates two Willow Cove processor cores (4 threads thanks to HyperThreading). Each core can clock from 3 GHz (base speed) to 4.1 GHz (single- and dual-core boost). The faster Core i5 and i7 models offer more cores and are therefore significantly faster.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. In the i3-1115G4 Intel is naming the GPU UHD Graphics and offers only 48 of the 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1250 MHz. GPU and CPU can together use the 6 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and WiFi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the second-gen 10 nm Intel SuperFin process that should be comparable to the 7 nm TSMC process (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Performance

Multi-thread peformance is most comparable to what the Intel Core i5-8250U and the AMD Ryzen 5 3450U deliver. This makes the i3 a more than decent option for day-to-day tasks; that said, any workload of the more taxing kind (such as exporting a high-bitrate, hour long UHD video) will be enough to bring the i3 to its knees.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the ThinkPad L15 G2-20X4S0KU00 is one of the fastest laptops powered by the 1115G4 we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs.

The Core i3-1115G4 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-10900KIntel Core i3-1115G4
CodenameComet LakeTiger Lake-UP3
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i9-10900K « 3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 « 3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3700 - 5300 MHz3000 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 202 / 4
TDP125 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10900K
35.3 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1115G4
29.1 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15821 Points (15%)
min: 2725     avg: 3038     median: 3125 (3%)     max: 3244 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1374 Points (58%)
min: 1242     avg: 1299     median: 1312 (55%)     max: 1319 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 493     avg: 516     median: 524 (57%)     max: 532 Points
min: 504     avg: 507     median: 504.5 (55%)     max: 515 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5825     avg: 6129     median: 6181 (15%)     max: 6381 Points
min: 961     avg: 1120     median: 1114 (3%)     max: 1251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2513     avg: 2555     median: 2533 (16%)     max: 2620 Points
min: 384.7     avg: 461.6     median: 480.5 (3%)     max: 507 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 206     avg: 215.7     median: 217 (60%)     max: 224 Points
min: 137     avg: 179.9     median: 190 (53%)     max: 197 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8127 Points (49%)
8018 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59368 Points (43%)
16265 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
80495 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10625 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
66.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9739 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 67252     avg: 69402     median: 69987 (40%)     max: 70968 MIPS
min: 11122     avg: 12669     median: 12919.5 (7%)     max: 13422 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5349     avg: 5705     median: 5811 (68%)     max: 5954 MIPS
min: 4497     avg: 4586     median: 4599.5 (54%)     max: 4674 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
149 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
289.5 fps (7%)
141.6 fps (4%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.2     avg: 19.7     median: 19.8 (35%)     max: 21 fps
min: 3.25     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (7%)     max: 4.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.6 GB/s (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.6 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2408 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 167.3     avg: 178.8     median: 179 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
min: 940     avg: 1037     median: 1021.5 (7%)     max: 1188 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.528     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
min: 0.636     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.671 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6331 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
403.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
16869 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20541     avg: 21539     median: 21935 (54%)     max: 22140 Points
min: 5128     avg: 5771     median: 5579.5 (14%)     max: 6640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74951 Points (61%)
min: 57115     avg: 59888     median: 60028 (49%)     max: 62520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75063 Points (61%)
min: 48647     avg: 55626     median: 56348 (46%)     max: 61883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
76898 Points (62%)
min: 65022     avg: 65592     median: 65591.5 (53%)     max: 66161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 19766     avg: 20118     median: 20117.5 (51%)     max: 20469 Points
min: 3986     avg: 4871     median: 5038 (13%)     max: 5250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29145     avg: 29466     median: 29447 (53%)     max: 29805 Points
min: 6125     avg: 7184     median: 7331.5 (13%)     max: 7786 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13028     avg: 13470     median: 13056 (55%)     max: 14326 Points
min: 2227     avg: 2623     median: 2635 (11%)     max: 2937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5487 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1869 Points (45%)
1786 Points (43%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
7882 Points (31%)
3428 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1336     avg: 1404     median: 1428 (54%)     max: 1449 Points
min: 1190     avg: 1296     median: 1311.5 (50%)     max: 1352 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10725     avg: 11177     median: 11393 (20%)     max: 11414 Points
min: 2341     avg: 2628     median: 2605 (5%)     max: 2983 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1330     avg: 1385     median: 1385 (6%)     max: 1440 Points
1328 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10714     avg: 11061     median: 11060.5 (35%)     max: 11407 Points
2399 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5904     avg: 6126     median: 6126 (61%)     max: 6348 Points
5601 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 40236     avg: 41647     median: 41647 (41%)     max: 43058 Points
9945 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 721 (1%)     max: 729 ms
min: 657.9     avg: 749     median: 755 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
145.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 49170     avg: 55606     median: 58151 (43%)     max: 59497 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
152.3 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 243     avg: 251     median: 255 (46%)     max: 255 Points
min: 200     avg: 213.7     median: 204.5 (37%)     max: 257 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
20509 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11801 Points (43%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 950     avg: 1029     median: 1033 (39%)     max: 1094 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
147 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
275.7 Watt (48%)
min: 24.7     avg: 36.1     median: 35.2 (6%)     max: 44.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
268.5 Watt (49%)
min: 25.6     avg: 36.3     median: 39.1 (7%)     max: 41.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
22.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.66     avg: 6.2     median: 5.8 (7%)     max: 7.67 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)
min: 12.1     avg: 13.5     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 16.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10900K → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1115G4 → 53% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 19. 03:23:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12211 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12242 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760837014s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 Oct 2025 05:21:56 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12211 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 12211 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12242 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 12242 +0.015s ... 0.036s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.093s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)