Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8650U vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U

Intel Core i7-8650U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8650U

The Intel Core i7-8650U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation and was announced in August 2017. Contrary to its direct predecessor the Core i7-7600U, which were still dual-cores, the i7-8650U is equipped with four cores but at a lower base frequency of 1.9 GHz. The Turbo Boost can go up to 4,2 GHz and therefore also offer good short term single core speeds. The GPU is now named Intel UHD Graphics 620 but otherwise identical to the Intel HD Graphics 620. The integrated memory controller supports DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors. Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behaviour will be interesting and depending on the laptop design. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads. The performance however is highly depending on the TDP settings and cooling solution of the laptop. Especially, longer loads will show varying results in different laptops.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 5650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R5 5650U integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the third fastest U-series processor at launch. The cores are clocked at 2.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC.

The PRO CPUs offer additional management and security features. The 5650U is otherwise identical to the Ryzen 5 5600U.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

With the increased clock speed and IPC improvements thanks to Zen 3, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U should be clearly faster than the 200 MHz lower clocked Ryzen 5 4500U.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with 7 CUs and up to 1800 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor (most chips are configured higher than 15 Watt). That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

ModelIntel Core i7-8650UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
CodenameKaby Lake RefreshCezanne-U PRO (Zen 3)
SeriesIntel Kaby Lake RefreshAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Series: Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) Cezanne-U PRO (Zen 3)
Intel Core i7-8650U « 1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U « 2.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5450U compare2.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1900 - 4200 MHz2300 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB3 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
SocketBGA1356FP6
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 5650U
32.2 pt (54%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6210     avg: 6593     median: 6429 (6%)     max: 7140 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1356     avg: 1362     median: 1363 (57%)     max: 1367 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 524     avg: 529     median: 531 (58%)     max: 533 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2415     avg: 2558     median: 2488 (6%)     max: 2771 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 451     avg: 589     median: 605 (4%)     max: 675 Points
min: 1048     avg: 1196     median: 1207 (8%)     max: 1333 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 128     avg: 165     median: 169 (47%)     max: 178 Points
min: 217     avg: 218.7     median: 218 (60%)     max: 221 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.04     avg: 6.4     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.24 Points
14.2 Points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.67     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 2.04 Points
2.6 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5307     avg: 6337     median: 6629 (40%)     max: 6782 Points
2.2 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16227     avg: 18738     median: 18635 (14%)     max: 21455 Points
12.5 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21677 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6864 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 268.3     avg: 301.9     median: 302.8 (4%)     max: 334.6 s
270.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.636     avg: 9.6     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 10.28 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
413.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
10.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4140     avg: 4423     median: 4319 (7%)     max: 4915 Points
5905 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32687     avg: 34529     median: 35235 (20%)     max: 35665 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5021     avg: 5044     median: 5031 (59%)     max: 5081 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 35     avg: 39.1     median: 39.8 (13%)     max: 41.98 fps
70.6 fps (24%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 149     avg: 165.4     median: 169.6 (39%)     max: 173.2 fps
216.1 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.36     avg: 8.7     median: 8.4 (15%)     max: 9.27 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.444 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.662     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.733 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.3 (11%)     max: 4.4 GB/s
7.9 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 422     avg: 439.9     median: 443.1 (3%)     max: 454.6 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.555     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.569 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4487     avg: 6716     median: 6936 (15%)     max: 7939 Points
11124 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 19     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (1%)     max: 20.1 s
18.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 501     avg: 513     median: 508 (2%)     max: 542 s
475.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
19125 Points (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5168     avg: 7106     median: 6863 (17%)     max: 8887 Points
min: 10261     avg: 10684     median: 10315 (25%)     max: 11475 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 39040     avg: 42198     median: 41275 (34%)     max: 47797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41011     avg: 43029     median: 41405.5 (34%)     max: 48293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 44090     avg: 52920     median: 56455 (47%)     max: 58675 Points
66451 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4442     avg: 5935     median: 6089 (15%)     max: 7416 Points
9668 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6823     avg: 8895     median: 9167 (16%)     max: 10541 Points
min: 14514     avg: 15397     median: 14782 (26%)     max: 16896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2685     avg: 3010     median: 2876 (12%)     max: 3569 Points
min: 4553     avg: 4778     median: 4601 (19%)     max: 5180 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1352     avg: 1363     median: 1353 (53%)     max: 1384 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5634     avg: 5719     median: 5736 (10%)     max: 5788 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1341 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5874 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5726 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
24383 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 809     avg: 1126     median: 1076.5 (1%)     max: 1912 ms
min: 653     avg: 740     median: 670 (1%)     max: 1053 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 63.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.4 (1%)     max: 83.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11491     avg: 31341     median: 33906 (25%)     max: 42822 Points
65444 Points (48%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
227 Points (41%)
min: 202     avg: 239.8     median: 246 (44%)     max: 250 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.6     avg: 29     median: 28.1 (5%)     max: 33.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25     avg: 27.9     median: 27.2 (5%)     max: 32.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.22     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 7.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 37.5     avg: 43.1     median: 38.5 (29%)     max: 53.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8650U → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U → 136% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 12:40:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9212 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13154 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754563241s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9212 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 9212 +0.015s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13154 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 13154 +0.006s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)