Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8086K vs Intel Core i7-9700K vs Intel Core i9-9900KS

Intel Core i7-8086K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8086K

The Intel Core i7-8086K is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in mid 2018. It is a limited edition for the 40 year X86 anniversary and at the time of announcement the fastest Coffee-Lake CPU. The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i7-8086K is comparatively easy to overclock thanks to the unlocked multiplier. Compared to the cheaper i7-8700K (-66 Dollars) only the single core Turbo clock speed is faster (5 GHz versus 4.7 GHz).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the Core i7-7700K when all cores are in use. Compared to the cheaper Core i7-8700K, the 8086K offers only a higher single core Turbo Boost and therefore in daily usage and gaming not faster. As a high-end model, the i7-8086K is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 95 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i7-9700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700K

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 4.9 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is even better than the old Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

Intel Core i9-9900KS

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900KS

The Intel Core i9-9900KS is a high end desktop processor that includes 8 cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It is the fastest Coffee Lake CPU in 2019 and compared to the similar named i9-9900K, the KS offers an all core Turbo of 5 GHz. All cores can clock between 4 GHz and 5 GHz and thanks to Hyperthreading / SMT 16 threads can be executed in parallel. The CPU is still manufactured in the mature 14 nm process (14nm++). Thanks to the open multiplicator, the CPU is rather easy to overclock (if a Z390 based mainboard is used).

With good cooling, the i9-9900KS can be around 10% faster than the older Intel Core i9-9900K (thanks to the 5 GHz all core Turbo). Compare to the old Core i7-8700K, the 9900KS is even 45% faster. Especially for gaming, the 9900KS is currently the fastest option available. The fast Ryzen and Threadripper CPUs from AMD however offer a better multithreaded performance.

The integrated GPU is called Intel UHD Graphics 630 and clocks with up to 1.2 GHz. It is not suited for demanding 3D games and located in the low end.

The TDP is raised to 127 Watt for the additional performance, therefore a good CPU cooler is needed. When overclocking the CPU, more than 200 Watt can be reached unter load.

ModelIntel Core i7-8086KIntel Core i7-9700KIntel Core i9-9900KS
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-RCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i7-8086K « 3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-87003.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-85003 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-84002.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K « 3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS « 4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3700 - 5000 MHz3600 - 4900 MHz4000 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 88 / 16
TDP95 Watt95 Watt127 Watt
Technology14 nm14++ nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$425 U.S.$385 U.S.$513 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comwww.intel.de
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8086K
35.2 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900KS
38.4 pt (53%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8686 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1260 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 488     avg: 495     median: 495 (55%)     max: 502 Points
475 Points (53%)
min: 509     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (57%)     max: 514 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2998     avg: 3111     median: 3111 (8%)     max: 3224 Points
3250 Points (8%)
min: 4463     avg: 4820     median: 4819.5 (12%)     max: 5176 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1340     avg: 1366     median: 1349 (9%)     max: 1408 Points
min: 1433     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (9%)     max: 1465 Points
min: 1962     avg: 2058     median: 2058 (13%)     max: 2154 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 205     median: 206 (62%)     max: 207 Points
min: 203     avg: 205.5     median: 205.5 (62%)     max: 208 Points
min: 215     avg: 216     median: 216 (65%)     max: 217 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 14.67     avg: 15     median: 15 (20%)     max: 15.41 Points
15.8 Points (21%)
min: 22.31     avg: 23.2     median: 23.1 (30%)     max: 23.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.2     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.35 Points
2.4 Points (59%)
min: 2.43     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (61%)     max: 2.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6541     avg: 7216     median: 7216 (44%)     max: 7891 Points
min: 7624     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (46%)     max: 7682 Points
min: 8143     avg: 8183     median: 8183 (49%)     max: 8223 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 33064     avg: 35896     median: 35896 (26%)     max: 38728 Points
min: 42677     avg: 42778     median: 42777.5 (31%)     max: 42878 Points
min: 50462     avg: 51779     median: 51778.5 (38%)     max: 53095 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
53600 Points (37%)
69169 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9774 Points (12%)
10759 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 119.7     avg: 119.8     median: 119.8 (1%)     max: 119.9 s
120.5 s (1%)
min: 82     avg: 87.9     median: 87.9 (1%)     max: 93.8 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.041     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (1%)     max: 4.21 s
4.5 s (1%)
min: 3.232     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 3.969 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6637     avg: 6752     median: 6751.5 (11%)     max: 6866 Points
7396 Points (12%)
min: 8156     avg: 8353     median: 8353 (13%)     max: 8550 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 35473     avg: 36060     median: 36059.5 (21%)     max: 36646 MIPS
min: 55064     avg: 55735     median: 55735 (32%)     max: 56406 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5325     avg: 5417     median: 5416.5 (65%)     max: 5508 MIPS
min: 5674     avg: 5734     median: 5734 (69%)     max: 5794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 85.1     avg: 85.5     median: 85.5 (30%)     max: 85.8 fps
94.8 fps (33%)
min: 116     avg: 122.5     median: 122.5 (43%)     max: 129 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 227.5     avg: 230.6     median: 230.6 (53%)     max: 233.6 fps
270 fps (62%)
min: 276.2     avg: 278.9     median: 278.9 (64%)     max: 281.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.2     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 11.4 fps
13 fps (23%)
min: 15.31     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (29%)     max: 17.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.792     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.795 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.8     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (20%)     max: 7.9 GB/s
8.1 GB/s (21%)
min: 12.1     avg: 12.2     median: 12.2 (32%)     max: 12.2 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 315     avg: 383.7     median: 316 (2%)     max: 520 Seconds
307 Seconds (2%)
min: 205.1     avg: 224.6     median: 224.6 (2%)     max: 244 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.567     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.5974 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10397     avg: 11218     median: 11218 (24%)     max: 12039 Points
min: 12844     avg: 13016     median: 12928 (28%)     max: 13447 Points
min: 14825     avg: 14884     median: 14883.5 (32%)     max: 14942 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.74     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 9.261 s
7.7 s (2%)
min: 7.405     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (2%)     max: 7.436 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.06     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (1%)     max: 20.59 s
17.4 s (1%)
min: 16.45     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.59 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 429.9     avg: 467     median: 467 (2%)     max: 504 s
421.1 s (2%)
min: 412.2     avg: 414.2     median: 414.2 (2%)     max: 416.1 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 53605     avg: 54313     median: 54484 (48%)     max: 54680 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11434     avg: 12861     median: 11554 (31%)     max: 15596 Points
min: 14489     avg: 15025     median: 14657 (40%)     max: 16091 Points
min: 18531     avg: 18914     median: 18694 (51%)     max: 19517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81711     avg: 82658     median: 82294 (67%)     max: 83908 Points
min: 75473     avg: 75482     median: 75482 (61%)     max: 75491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83615     avg: 83781     median: 83781 (68%)     max: 83947 Points
min: 75946     avg: 76061     median: 76060.5 (62%)     max: 76175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81896     avg: 84164     median: 84164 (71%)     max: 86432 Points
min: 74085     avg: 75802     median: 75508 (64%)     max: 77813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12856     avg: 13012     median: 13018 (33%)     max: 13171 Points
min: 19068     avg: 19770     median: 20049 (51%)     max: 20193 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18241     avg: 18437     median: 18332 (33%)     max: 18780 Points
min: 24327     avg: 25511     median: 26016 (46%)     max: 26191 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6745 Points (28%)
min: 7736     avg: 7954     median: 7875 (33%)     max: 8349 Points
min: 11017     avg: 11358     median: 11375 (48%)     max: 11683 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1240 Points (52%)
1300 Points (55%)
1372 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5485 Points (10%)
7440 Points (13%)
9100 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1234     avg: 1276     median: 1276 (6%)     max: 1318 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5618     avg: 5644     median: 5644 (18%)     max: 5670 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5768     avg: 5821     median: 5792 (58%)     max: 5904 Points
min: 5925     avg: 5984     median: 5984 (60%)     max: 6043 Points
6308 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22817     avg: 24618     median: 24527 (27%)     max: 26509 Points
min: 28792     avg: 29226     median: 29225.5 (33%)     max: 29659 Points
35586 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5744 Points (78%)
6313 Points (86%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
26471 Points (64%)
35932 Points (88%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
27774 Points (49%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4825 Points (94%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 861     avg: 862     median: 862 (1%)     max: 863 ms
948 ms (1%)
883 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
41962 Points (38%)
44538 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 216     avg: 217     median: 217 (45%)     max: 218 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
222.4 Watt (38%)
259.6 Watt (45%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
202.6 Watt (37%)
min: 219.3     avg: 269.1     median: 292.7 (53%)     max: 295.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
7.1 Points per Watt (5%)
min: 7.29     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (6%)     max: 8.95 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8086K → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700K → 107% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900KS → 128% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 06. 15:34:14

#0 checking url part for id 10106 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11116 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11553 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10106 +0.017s ... 0.05s

#8 got single benchmarks 10106 +0.022s ... 0.072s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11116 +0.002s ... 0.074s

#10 got single benchmarks 11116 +0.015s ... 0.09s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11553 +0.017s ... 0.106s

#12 got single benchmarks 11553 +0.01s ... 0.116s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.401s ... 0.518s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.518s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)