Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i9-12900 vs Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i7-10700K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-10700K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Comet Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.8 - 5.1 GHz. The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1) but the PL2 is set to 229 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

Intel Core i9-12900

► remove from comparison  i9-12900

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.1 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.8 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 202 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-10700KIntel Core i9-12900Intel Core i5-10400F
SeriesIntel Comet Lake Alder Lake-SIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet LakeAlder LakeComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 « 2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz2400 - 5100 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB1.4 MB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB14 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB20 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1616 / 246 / 12
TDP125 Watt65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200LGA 1700LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$400 U.S.$489 U.S.$155 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size215 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10700K
37.8 pt (52%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900
43.8 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18628 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1825 Points (78%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
496 Points (55%)
703 Points (78%)
438 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4882 Points (12%)
7179 Points (18%)
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2027 Points (13%)
3299 Points (21%)
1332 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
208 Points (63%)
262 Points (79%)
180 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
22.2 Points (29%)
39 Points (51%)
14.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (59%)
3.2 Points (79%)
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7910 Points (48%)
8949 Points (54%)
6719 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
50670 Points (37%)
68729 Points (50%)
36564 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
64901 Points (45%)
107565 Points (75%)
47901 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10201 Points (12%)
14610 Points (18%)
8849 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
85.7 s (1%)
211.8 s (3%)
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
2.7 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8469 Points (13%)
10739 Points (17%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
54050 MIPS (31%)
50152 MIPS (29%)
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5647 MIPS (68%)
5979 MIPS (71%)
5064 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
121 fps (42%)
147.5 fps (51%)
81.2 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
269 fps (62%)
310 fps (72%)
228.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
14.4 fps (25%)
11.2 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
1.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
3.4 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
17.2 GB/s (45%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
217.4 Seconds (2%)
262.7 Seconds (2%)
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (12%)
0.5 sec (12%)
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17464 Points (37%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
391.3 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
78877 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18064 Points (49%)
24314 Points (66%)
14539 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72174 Points (59%)
74061 Points (60%)
62086 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72375 Points (59%)
73871 Points (60%)
61795 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74085 Points (62%)
62883 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
18637 Points (47%)
19775 Points (50%)
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24791 Points (44%)
35153 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10963 Points (46%)
15095 Points (64%)
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1371     avg: 1374     median: 1373.5 (58%)     max: 1376 Points
1656 Points (70%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8911     avg: 8925     median: 8925 (16%)     max: 8939 Points
8924 Points (16%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1368 Points (6%)
1638 Points (7%)
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8903 Points (28%)
8845 Points (28%)
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6247 Points (62%)
6991 Points (70%)
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
34735 Points (38%)
36310 Points (40%)
25403 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
747 ms (1%)
602 ms (1%)
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
245 Points (51%)
269 Points (56%)
215 Points (45%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1785 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205 Watt (35%)
151 Watt (26%)
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207.7 Watt (38%)
206 Watt (38%)
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.7 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)
16 Points per Watt (12%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10700K → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900 → 119% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 81% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 17. 19:47:44

#0 checking url part for id 12778 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14150 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12778 +0.017s ... 0.042s

#8 got single benchmarks 12778 +0.007s ... 0.049s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14150 +0.016s ... 0.065s

#10 got single benchmarks 14150 +0.009s ... 0.074s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.017s ... 0.092s

#12 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.006s ... 0.098s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.38s ... 0.478s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.478s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)