Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13500HX vs Intel Core i7-13650HX

Intel Core i5-13500HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13500HX

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.5 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Ther performance should be slightly below the old Intel Core i5-12650HX (Alder Lake, 14 cores, up to 4.8 GHz).

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

Intel Core i7-13650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13650HX

The Intel Core i5-13650HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.9 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

The performance should be slightly higher than the old Core i5-12650HX (14 cores, Alder Lake architecture, up to 4.8 GHz).

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i5-13500HXIntel Core i7-13650HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX « 1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX « 1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4700 MHz1900 - 4900 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2014 / 20
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics (Xe architecture, 16 EUs), DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Raptor Lake-HX i5-13500HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX i7-13650HX
SocketBGA1964

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500HX
60.9 pt (68%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13650HX
64 pt (72%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18235 Points (30%)
21006 Points (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1903 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
695 Points (80%)
728 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6978 Points (30%)
7999 Points (34%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2856 Points (29%)
3136 Points (32%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
263 Points (80%)
275 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.7 Points (48%)
37.4 Points (53%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (10%)
3.3 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8980 Points (54%)
10616 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58608 Points (42%)
68755 Points (50%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
400.2 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8422 Points (49%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
73701 MIPS (46%)
80057 MIPS (50%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5850 MIPS (70%)
6125 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
175.1 fps (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
345.8 fps (81%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20.9 fps (45%)
23.6 fps (51%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (50%)
1.6 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (52%)
2.9 GB/s (54%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.6 GB/s (45%)
16.7 GB/s (51%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
310 Seconds (4%)
273 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
178 Seconds (1%)
158 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15927 Points (34%)
16051 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
14.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
408 s (2%)
370.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
78386 Points (73%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
24719 Points (67%)
24629 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
21558 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
30600 Points (56%)
31895 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14159 Points (70%)
14029 Points (69%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1779 Points (77%)
1838 Points (80%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13767 Points (48%)
14367 Points (50%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7895 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52742 Points (59%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
547 ms (1%)
502 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
257 Points (77%)
277 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (68%)
312 Points (72%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
146.8 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
158 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
16.7 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
15 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.8 Points per Watt (23%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500HX → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13650HX → 106% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 09. 10:32:57

#0 checking url part for id 14667 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14669 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:55:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14667 +0.012s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 14667 +0.011s ... 0.039s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14669 +0.007s ... 0.046s

#9 got single benchmarks 14669 +0.008s ... 0.054s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.167s ... 0.221s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.245s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)