Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13450HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 260

Intel Core i5-13450HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13450HX

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 4 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.4 GHz (base) up to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.4 GHz. All cores can access the combined 20 MB L3 cache (compared to the 36 MB of the i9 models).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13450HX as of August 2023, we have tested several systems featuring the Core i5-12600K, a CPU with very similar specs (six P-cores mated to four E-cores, both running at insignificantly faster clock speeds than what the 13450HX has). Based on that, we expect the 13450HX to be 10% to 15% behind the Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the system's cooling solution is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its "base" power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The i5-13450HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-13450HXAMD Ryzen 7 260
CodenameRaptor Lake-HXHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock1800 - 4600 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 16
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
Die Size257 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964FP8
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1450 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT8
Chip AI38 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13450HX
37.7 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.3 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
101.5 Points (51%)
min: 104     avg: 105     median: 104.6 (52%)     max: 106.5 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
812 Points (15%)
min: 786     avg: 925     median: 990 (18%)     max: 1000 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16575     avg: 16869     median: 16797 (16%)     max: 17234 Points
min: 15864     avg: 16951     median: 17277 (16%)     max: 17712 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1710     avg: 1741     median: 1746 (71%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 1760     avg: 1774     median: 1760 (72%)     max: 1801 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 652     avg: 666     median: 667 (73%)     max: 680 Points
min: 679     avg: 689     median: 690 (75%)     max: 697 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6489     avg: 6539     median: 6532 (16%)     max: 6595 Points
min: 6161     avg: 6633     median: 6770 (17%)     max: 6969 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2427     avg: 2478     median: 2503 (16%)     max: 2505 Points
min: 2564     avg: 2721     median: 2769 (17%)     max: 2831 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 239     avg: 246     median: 248 (69%)     max: 251 Points
min: 275     avg: 278.7     median: 278 (77%)     max: 283 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.2 Points (38%)
30.1 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (72%)
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9840 Points (59%)
7384 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58749 Points (43%)
45689 Points (33%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6830 Points (11%)
7121 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 59026     avg: 61014     median: 61811 (35%)     max: 62204 MIPS
min: 63076     avg: 69455     median: 72400 (42%)     max: 72888 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5370     avg: 5506     median: 5571 (66%)     max: 5576 MIPS
min: 6101     avg: 6346     median: 6439 (76%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
141.7 fps (4%)
144.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
324.6 fps (8%)
269.1 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.9     avg: 18.3     median: 17.5 (31%)     max: 20.5 fps
min: 17.6     avg: 20.5     median: 21.4 (38%)     max: 22.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.5 GB/s (35%)
11.4 GB/s (30%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 338     avg: 374     median: 387 (5%)     max: 397 Seconds
min: 290     avg: 301.3     median: 292 (4%)     max: 322 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 196     avg: 208.3     median: 200 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
min: 182     avg: 189.7     median: 183 (1%)     max: 204 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4582     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4838 sec
min: 0.4454     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4479 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14017 Points (30%)
14995 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.9 s (1%)
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
402 s (2%)
529 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21532     avg: 21934     median: 21982 (54%)     max: 22288 Points
min: 17725     avg: 22093     median: 23626 (58%)     max: 24928 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82893 Points (67%)
84022 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19916 Points (50%)
19375 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27233     avg: 27745     median: 27595 (49%)     max: 28408 Points
min: 25641     avg: 28256     median: 29400 (52%)     max: 29727 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12644     avg: 12938     median: 13047 (55%)     max: 13123 Points
min: 9216     avg: 10180     median: 10609 (45%)     max: 10714 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2381     avg: 2415     median: 2417 (56%)     max: 2448 Points
min: 2622     avg: 2659     median: 2673 (62%)     max: 2683 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 12619     avg: 12701     median: 12684 (49%)     max: 12799 Points
min: 10180     avg: 12276     median: 13299 (52%)     max: 13349 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2301 Points (73%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12295 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1696     avg: 1739     median: 1757 (59%)     max: 1763 Points
min: 1948     avg: 1963     median: 1954 (66%)     max: 1986 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11973     avg: 12000     median: 12005 (22%)     max: 12022 Points
min: 9848     avg: 11561     median: 12239 (22%)     max: 12597 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7348 Points (81%)
7721 Points (85%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
41034 Points (54%)
41046 Points (54%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 531     avg: 537     median: 531 (1%)     max: 550 ms
min: 494     avg: 528     median: 528 (1%)     max: 562 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
87588 Points (58%)
min: 105241     avg: 106578     median: 106578 (70%)     max: 107914 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
243 Points (63%)
min: 239     avg: 253.7     median: 261 (68%)     max: 261 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 262     avg: 274.7     median: 281 (50%)     max: 281 Points
min: 276     avg: 293.7     median: 297 (53%)     max: 308 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1804 Points (67%)
min: 1712     avg: 1752     median: 1752 (66%)     max: 1792 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.7     avg: 134.8     median: 134.8 (23%)     max: 160.8 Watt
105%
1 R7 260 +
min: 68.3     avg: 109.1     median: 128.6 (22%)     max: 130.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 125.5     avg: 132.3     median: 132.3 (24%)     max: 139 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 19.2     avg: 25.4     median: 25.4 (17%)     max: 31.6 Watt
140%
1 R7 260 +
min: 4.06     avg: 16.5     median: 18.2 (12%)     max: 27.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.5     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (18%)     max: 18.1 Watt
214%
1 R7 260 +
min: 4.35     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (8%)     max: 9.03 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 R7 260 +
min: 20.4     avg: 21.3     median: 21.3 (16%)     max: 22.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13450HX → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 104% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 27. 03:09:09

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14673 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761530949s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Oct 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14673 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14673 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 19156 +0.007s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)