Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1235U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-64-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 is a moderately fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that debuted in April 2024. The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon CPU cores (10 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The chip's smarter X Elite series brothers including first and foremost the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 are thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with more CPU cores enabled, higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance is very close to that of the Intel Core i7-13700H and the 9-core Apple M4, meaning this is a pretty fast CPU that's good for most tasks one could possibly throw at it in 2024.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming; while slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1P-64-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-80-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-80-100 is the second-fastest member of the Snapdragon X series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at up to 4.0 GHz, the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The faster Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU and the same number of CPU cores but with higher GPU and CPU clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is thought to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they can run at up to 3.4 GHz. The much more desirable 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

Given the very similar clock speeds, its multi-thread benchmark scores should be about the same as that of the X1E-78-100 for Ryzen 7 7840U and Apple M3-like performance in most real-world tasks. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the X1E-80-100.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is somewhat underwhelming. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-80-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful brother (the latter can be set to consume up to 80 Watts). Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1235UQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
CodenameAlder Lake-UOryonOryon
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-MQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core i7-1265U1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85050.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85000.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73050.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73000.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 « - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 « - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock900 - 4400 MHz <=3400 MHz <=4000 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB2.3 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB12 MB12 MB
L3 Cache12 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1210 / 10
10 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 12
12 x 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP15 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
33.4 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-80-100
33.7 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
93 Points (52%)
109 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
406 Points (8%)
795 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
8644 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (67%)     max: 1698 Points
1129 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (67%)     max: 651 Points
420 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
3252 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
1989 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (60%)     max: 242.3 Points
209 Points (58%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.3 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2661 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17854 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
242.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
11885 Points (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
37289 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
4652 MIPS (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
751 Seconds (10%)
min: 593     avg: 677     median: 632.5 (8%)     max: 899 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
402 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
0.7 sec (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
873 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (25%)     max: 15604 Points
13595 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
67708 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
min: 10549     avg: 10757     median: 10756.5 (27%)     max: 10964 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
16496 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
4652 Points (20%)
min: 3589     avg: 4841     median: 5077 (21%)     max: 5323 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (52%)     max: 2208 Points
2445 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
13278 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1897     median: 1897 (60%)     max: 2106 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5677     avg: 6161     median: 6160.5 (25%)     max: 6644 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (62%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
460.8 ms (1%)
min: 390.9     avg: 403.9     median: 400.3 (0%)     max: 422.3 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (58%)     max: 83104 Points
80936 Points (59%)
min: 88198     avg: 92454     median: 92123 (67%)     max: 98705 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (62%)     max: 236 Points
256 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (45%)     max: 305 Points
399 Points (72%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (4%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (42%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (53%)     max: 1644 Points
1216 Points (45%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
min: 54.2     avg: 56.1     median: 56.9 (10%)     max: 57.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
40.6 Watt (7%)
min: 41.1     avg: 57.8     median: 61.5 (11%)     max: 67.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
5.3 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 7.17 Watt
4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt
49 Points per Watt (37%)
min: 28.8     avg: 32     median: 31.6 (24%)     max: 35.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 → 116% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 → 131% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 12. 12:00:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17589 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17575 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757671201s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.024s ... 0.04s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17589 +0.004s ... 0.043s

#11 got single benchmarks 17589 +0.005s ... 0.048s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17575 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#13 got single benchmarks 17575 +0.009s ... 0.061s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.112s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.112s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)