Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.4 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional low power cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 45 watts.

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card that offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.35 GHz.

Performance - High End

The top model offers all the cores that are built into the chip and clocks relatively high at up to 5.4 GHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet Design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285HIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
CodenameArrow Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz14 / 14 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock4500 - 5400 MHz3600 - 4500 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt
Technology5 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$651 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 285H
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 125H
35.7 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 127     avg: 128     median: 127.5 (72%)     max: 130 Points
min: 97     avg: 100.2     median: 100 (56%)     max: 102.2 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 740     avg: 948     median: 928 (17%)     max: 1194 Points
min: 331     avg: 638     median: 668 (12%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16632     avg: 19352     median: 19347.5 (18%)     max: 22080 Points
min: 9194     avg: 12514     median: 12989 (12%)     max: 14564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2126     avg: 2145     median: 2145 (90%)     max: 2163 Points
min: 1549     avg: 1661     median: 1655 (70%)     max: 1735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 810     avg: 821     median: 822 (90%)     max: 830 Points
min: 622     avg: 640     median: 633 (69%)     max: 664 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6517     avg: 7525     median: 7665 (19%)     max: 8251 Points
min: 3673     avg: 4830     median: 4948 (12%)     max: 5618 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2797     avg: 3072     median: 3079 (19%)     max: 3333 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1996     median: 2077 (13%)     max: 2245 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 311     avg: 314     median: 313.5 (87%)     max: 318 Points
min: 235     avg: 242.6     median: 246 (68%)     max: 251 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 35.99     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (49%)     max: 40.33 Points
min: 21.9     avg: 25.6     median: 26.7 (34%)     max: 27.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.72     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (90%)     max: 3.82 Points
min: 2.86     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (70%)     max: 3.03 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11459     avg: 11518     median: 11517.5 (70%)     max: 11576 Points
min: 8948     avg: 9295     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9561 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 72114     avg: 78422     median: 78421.5 (57%)     max: 84729 Points
min: 45559     avg: 50476     median: 51477.5 (37%)     max: 53390 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
111175 Points (71%)
min: 78788     avg: 78803     median: 78802.5 (50%)     max: 78817 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17515 Points (21%)
min: 12858     avg: 13070     median: 13069.5 (16%)     max: 13281 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 104.802     avg: 171.6     median: 171.6 (2%)     max: 238.3 s
min: 148.994     avg: 231     median: 247 (3%)     max: 296.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.3     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (1%)     max: 7.1 s
min: 4.107     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7690     avg: 12211     median: 12211 (19%)     max: 16732 Points
min: 5594     avg: 7773     median: 6209 (10%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 53335     avg: 60499     median: 59492.5 (34%)     max: 69676 MIPS
0 MIPS (0%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5999     avg: 6173     median: 6137 (72%)     max: 6419 MIPS
min: 4663     avg: 4950     median: 5004 (59%)     max: 5136 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (59%)
min: 129.6     avg: 132     median: 132.3 (44%)     max: 134 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
363 fps (84%)
min: 304.5     avg: 306.1     median: 305.3 (70%)     max: 308.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.8     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 25.9 fps
min: 9.7     avg: 13.5     median: 13.8 (24%)     max: 16.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (34%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
min: 0.817     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (25%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (24%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (25%)     max: 10 GB/s
min: 8.8     avg: 8.9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 259     avg: 344     median: 350 (4%)     max: 417 Seconds
min: 391     avg: 500     median: 435 (6%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 159     avg: 200     median: 203 (1%)     max: 235 Seconds
min: 228     avg: 278.7     median: 248 (2%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4111     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4343 sec
min: 0.4898     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.565 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15781     avg: 16200     median: 16199.5 (34%)     max: 16618 Points
min: 12498     avg: 13652     median: 13866 (30%)     max: 13971 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.084     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.744 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.516     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.7 s
min: 16.446     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 16.967 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
389.3 s (2%)
min: 394.697     avg: 406.3     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 423.565 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81047     avg: 84682     median: 84682 (65%)     max: 88317 Points
min: 43778     avg: 65927     median: 71115.5 (55%)     max: 71915 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19102     avg: 22213     median: 22707.5 (56%)     max: 24334 Points
min: 12766     avg: 16294     median: 16940 (42%)     max: 17992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 96324     avg: 105536     median: 105536 (86%)     max: 114747 Points
min: 69572     avg: 72139     median: 72618 (59%)     max: 73481 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 97320     avg: 104879     median: 104879 (85%)     max: 112438 Points
min: 69751     avg: 71822     median: 72061.5 (58%)     max: 73412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
103278 Points (86%)
min: 79411     avg: 83102     median: 84374 (70%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20952     avg: 22153     median: 21867 (55%)     max: 23640 Points
min: 14164     avg: 14874     median: 14955 (38%)     max: 15261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27803     avg: 33277     median: 35044 (62%)     max: 35532 Points
min: 16291     avg: 21020     median: 21944 (39%)     max: 22978 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6727     avg: 11151     median: 11650 (49%)     max: 13154 Points
min: 6216     avg: 8197     median: 8719 (37%)     max: 9182 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2665     avg: 2911     median: 2917.5 (73%)     max: 3110 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2277     median: 2288 (57%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 15330     avg: 16490     median: 16440 (64%)     max: 17992 Points
min: 11087     avg: 11404     median: 11411.5 (44%)     max: 11749 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1982     avg: 2111     median: 2102 (82%)     max: 2256 Points
min: 1593     avg: 1657     median: 1668 (65%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14243     avg: 15421     median: 15408 (28%)     max: 16626 Points
min: 9069     avg: 10217     median: 10309 (18%)     max: 10856 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2196 Points (10%)
min: 1596     avg: 1628     median: 1627.5 (7%)     max: 1659 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14890 Points (47%)
min: 10676     avg: 10712     median: 10711.5 (34%)     max: 10747 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9220 Points (92%)
min: 6734     avg: 6816     median: 6750 (67%)     max: 6964 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54076 Points (54%)
min: 38648     avg: 38726     median: 38736 (39%)     max: 38793 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 418     avg: 438.5     median: 436 (1%)     max: 464 ms
min: 560     avg: 580     median: 575 (1%)     max: 607 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 109360     avg: 115546     median: 115823 (88%)     max: 121454 Points
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (65%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 254     avg: 301.4     median: 314 (86%)     max: 323.6 Points
min: 222     avg: 231.3     median: 231 (63%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 280     avg: 323.3     median: 327.5 (59%)     max: 358 Points
min: 245     avg: 253.7     median: 254 (46%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1812     avg: 2069     median: 2118.5 (79%)     max: 2227 Points
min: 1480     avg: 1558     median: 1540.5 (58%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 53.2     avg: 77.1     median: 61.8 (11%)     max: 131.6 Watt
min: 41.3     avg: 64.4     median: 62.2 (11%)     max: 90.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 65.4     avg: 95.7     median: 93.4 (17%)     max: 130.5 Watt
min: 56.7     avg: 70.7     median: 64.3 (12%)     max: 89.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.27     avg: 11.6     median: 6 (4%)     max: 29.2 Watt
min: 4.31     avg: 8     median: 6.4 (4%)     max: 14.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.65     avg: 7.4     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 10.3 Watt
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.5     avg: 33.6     median: 33.1 (25%)     max: 42.8 Points per Watt
min: 24     avg: 28     median: 28 (21%)     max: 31.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 285H → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 76% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 22. 13:40:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18542 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753184453s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 22 Jul 2025 05:17:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18542 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 18542 +0.009s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.013s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.017s ... 0.052s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.092s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)