Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 vs Intel Core i5-1235U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-64-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 is a moderately fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that debuted in April 2024. The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon CPU cores (10 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The chip's smarter X Elite series brothers including first and foremost the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 are thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with more CPU cores enabled, higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance is very close to that of the Intel Core i7-13700H and the 9-core Apple M4, meaning this is a pretty fast CPU that's good for most tasks one could possibly throw at it in 2024.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming; while slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1P-64-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-42-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 3.4 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-42-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, the average X1P-42-100 competes with older chips such as the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code. With apps compiled specifically with Windows on ARM in mind, a Core i7-1360P-like performance level is to be expected which is not bad at all for what is supposed to be a budget CPU.

The 3.4 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When under multi-threaded load, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.2 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100Intel Core i5-1235UQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
CodenameOryonAlder Lake-UOryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Alder Lake-MQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 « - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Intel Core i7-1265U1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85050.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85000.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73050.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73000.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock <=3400 MHz900 - 4400 MHz <=3400 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB928 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB9.5 MB12 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 10
10 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
10 / 128 / 8
8 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
NPU / AI45 TOPS INT845 TOPS INT8
ArchitectureARMx86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP15 Watt30 Watt
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
33.4 pt (56%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-42-100
30.2 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
109 Points (61%)
93 Points (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
795 Points (15%)
406 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8644 Points (8%)
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
min: 6062     avg: 7312     median: 7422 (7%)     max: 8284 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1129 Points (47%)
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (67%)     max: 1698 Points
min: 1065     avg: 1110     median: 1109 (47%)     max: 1134 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
420 Points (46%)
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (67%)     max: 651 Points
min: 406     avg: 419.3     median: 421 (46%)     max: 425 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3252 Points (8%)
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
min: 2361     avg: 2787     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1989 Points (13%)
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
min: 1191     avg: 1427     median: 1419 (9%)     max: 1556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
209 Points (58%)
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (60%)     max: 242.3 Points
min: 206     avg: 210.1     median: 211 (58%)     max: 215 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.3 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2661 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17854 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
242.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
11885 Points (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
37289 MIPS (21%)
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
min: 29238     avg: 31053     median: 30828 (18%)     max: 32811 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4652 MIPS (55%)
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
min: 4087     avg: 4504     median: 4561 (54%)     max: 4675 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
min: 3.16     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (9%)     max: 6.02 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
751 Seconds (10%)
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
min: 711     avg: 898     median: 856 (11%)     max: 1226 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
402 Seconds (3%)
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
min: 399     avg: 496.3     median: 466 (3%)     max: 683 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (16%)
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.728     avg: 0.8     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.777 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
873 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13595 Points (33%)
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (25%)     max: 15604 Points
min: 11743     avg: 12416     median: 12523 (31%)     max: 12625 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
67708 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
min: 8737     avg: 8919     median: 8996 (23%)     max: 9024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16496 Points (29%)
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
min: 13147     avg: 13554     median: 13563 (24%)     max: 13780 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4652 Points (20%)
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
min: 3282     avg: 4225     median: 3306 (14%)     max: 5699 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2445 Points (59%)
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (51%)     max: 2208 Points
min: 2287     avg: 2384     median: 2393.5 (58%)     max: 2442 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13278 Points (52%)
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
min: 10833     avg: 11258     median: 11384 (44%)     max: 11508 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1688     avg: 1897     median: 1897 (60%)     max: 2106 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 5677     avg: 6161     median: 6160.5 (25%)     max: 6644 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (60%)     max: 1643 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (58%)     max: 1576 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
min: 4457     avg: 5351     median: 5350.5 (10%)     max: 6244 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
460.8 ms (1%)
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
min: 407.5     avg: 640     median: 472.1 (1%)     max: 1145 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
80936 Points (59%)
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (58%)     max: 83104 Points
min: 78058     avg: 81387     median: 79536 (58%)     max: 88419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
256 Points (70%)
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (62%)     max: 236 Points
min: 130.3     avg: 251.9     median: 270 (74%)     max: 284 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
399 Points (72%)
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (45%)     max: 305 Points
min: 129.9     avg: 356.4     median: 401 (72%)     max: 426 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (4%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (42%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1216 Points (45%)
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (53%)     max: 1644 Points
min: 1061     avg: 1186     median: 1161 (43%)     max: 1463 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
min: 32.2     avg: 43.1     median: 44.3 (8%)     max: 58.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.6 Watt (7%)
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
min: 37.5     avg: 50.7     median: 51.8 (9%)     max: 60.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.3 Watt (4%)
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
min: 2.95     avg: 4.9     median: 4.2 (3%)     max: 9.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4 Watt (5%)
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 7.17 Watt
min: 2.56     avg: 4.5     median: 4.9 (6%)     max: 6.14 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
49 Points per Watt (37%)
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt
min: 25.9     avg: 28     median: 27.3 (20%)     max: 31.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 94% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 → 91% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 09. 11:24:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17589 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760001891s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17589 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 17589 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.026s ... 0.05s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.004s ... 0.053s

#13 got single benchmarks 17591 +0.01s ... 0.063s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.114s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)