Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.3 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The CPU is clocked 100 MHz (base and boost) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900HS should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming. Compared to the similar named 45W-version, the Ryzen 9 4900H, the 4900HS is differs in 100 MHz boost and 300 MHz base clock.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with most likely 7 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. The Ryzen 7 4900HS is the 35 Watt version of the R9 4900H with a 10 Watt lower TDP.

Intel Core i9-9880H

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i9-9880H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.3 - 4.8 GHz (4.1 GHz with 8 cores) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 4.8 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 4.8 GHz (+200 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores.

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-8950HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked predecessor and even up to 100% compared to older Kaby-Lake quad-cores. Single thread performance however only improved slightly and the multi-core performance is heavily depending on the cooling.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 4900HSIntel Core i9-9880HIntel Xeon E-2276M
CodenameRenoir (Zen 2)Coffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Clock3000 - 4300 MHz2300 - 4800 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 166 / 12
TDP35 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FCBGA1440
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H « 2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900HS
31.5 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9880H
30.9 pt (51%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
31.3 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8504     avg: 8670     median: 8747 (8%)     max: 8758 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1140     avg: 1174     median: 1174 (49%)     max: 1208 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
495 Points (54%)
min: 441     avg: 459     median: 465 (51%)     max: 474 Points
484 Points (53%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4288 Points (10%)
min: 2953     avg: 3271     median: 3235 (8%)     max: 3712 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1863 Points (12%)
min: 1317     avg: 1506     median: 1508 (10%)     max: 1721 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
193 Points (53%)
min: 181     avg: 190.1     median: 190 (53%)     max: 198 Points
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (54%)     max: 201 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.2 Points (24%)
18.9 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
2.1 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5866 Points (35%)
6967 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37938 Points (27%)
42456 Points (31%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
88.2 s (1%)
118.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
5.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4548 Points (7%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48577 MIPS (28%)
min: 39455     avg: 42728     median: 42138 (24%)     max: 46591 MIPS
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4634 MIPS (55%)
min: 4837     avg: 4943     median: 4924 (58%)     max: 5068 MIPS
5214 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
106 fps (3%)
102.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223 fps (6%)
217 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.2 fps (21%)
min: 10.6     avg: 11.2     median: 11.1 (20%)     max: 11.86 fps
9.7 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
0.7 GB/s (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
1 GB/s (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
7.5 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
297 Seconds (2%)
min: 293     avg: 336.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 384 Seconds
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.621     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.6904 sec
113%
1 E-2276M +
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12448 Points (26%)
min: 11788     avg: 12226     median: 12225.5 (26%)     max: 12663 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.8 s (1%)
18.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
547 s (2%)
476.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57045 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15184 Points (37%)
min: 12593     avg: 15310     median: 15556 (38%)     max: 17046 Points
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (31%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63010 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
62786 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67850 Points (54%)
40635 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15900 Points (40%)
min: 10705     avg: 12582     median: 12214 (31%)     max: 15206 Points
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21873 Points (39%)
min: 14940     avg: 18040     median: 18580 (33%)     max: 20125 Points
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8966 Points (38%)
min: 6412     avg: 7482     median: 7221 (30%)     max: 9138 Points
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1218 Points (48%)
min: 1115     avg: 1176     median: 1176 (46%)     max: 1237 Points
1303 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7675 Points (14%)
min: 7109     avg: 7231     median: 7231 (13%)     max: 7353 Points
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1139     avg: 1188     median: 1186 (5%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6841     avg: 7034     median: 7100 (22%)     max: 7161 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5372 Points (54%)
min: 5166     avg: 5409     median: 5457 (54%)     max: 5605 Points
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30230 Points (30%)
min: 28192     avg: 29022     median: 29077 (29%)     max: 29798 Points
24150 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
894 ms (1%)
min: 715     avg: 919     median: 934 (1%)     max: 1044 ms
784 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38616 Points (28%)
min: 38079     avg: 43238     median: 40443 (30%)     max: 50837 Points
56114 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
184 Points (33%)
120%
1 E-2276M +
220 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
940 Points (35%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.2 Watt (18%)
85.2 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.5 Watt (19%)
min: 99.9     avg: 131.6     median: 131.6 (24%)     max: 163.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.4 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 10.5     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (9%)     max: 14.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9880H → 92% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 88% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 11. 15:19:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11882 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11348 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757596772s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11882 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 11882 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11348 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 11348 +0.012s ... 0.03s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 11549 +0s ... 0.032s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.073s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)